Analysis of the 5′ Noncoding Region versus the NS5b Region in Genotyping Hepatitis C Virus Isolates from Blood Donors in France

The 5′ noncoding region (5′ NCR) of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has become the standard for genotyping even though several reports show that its use can result in classification errors. The purpose of this study was to perform genotyping based on sequence analysis of the NS5b region in a set of 357 HCV strains isolated from blood donors in France in 2002 and 2003. Results were compared with those previously obtained using 5′ NCR analysis, and HCV subtype distribution was reevaluated. Twenty-six of 120 strains (∼22%) initially identified as genotype 1b by 5′ NCR region sequence analysis were reclassified as genotype 1a by NS5b region sequence analysis. Similarly, 14 of 23 strains (∼61%) initially identified as 2a/2c were reclassified as non-2a and non-2c subtypes, and 12 of 22 strains (∼45%) initially identified as 4c/4d subtypes were reclassified as non-4c and non-4d subtypes. Sequence analysis of the NS5b region also revealed 5 putative new subtype 2 variants and 2 putative new subtype 4 variants. Although these findings demonstrated full agreement between 5′ NCR and NS5b sequence analysis with regard to type classification, genotyping based on phylogenetic analysis of the NS5b region is more accurate for subtype determination than genotyping based on analysis of the 5′ NCR. Sequence analysis of the NS5b region is mandatory for epidemiologic studies

Molecular characterization of genotype 2 and 4 hepatitis C virus isolates in French blood donors

The subtype distribution of 142 genotype 2 and 97 genotype 4 hepatitis C virus (HCV) isolates from the sera of 1,319 volunteer blood donors in France was determined by gene sequencing and by phylogenetic analysis of the NS5B region and E1 envelope. Findings underlined a wide range of subtypes in both genotypes, that is, 20 in HCV-2 and 11 in HCV-4. Eighteen of these 31 subtypes had not been defined previously. Some subtypes, that is, 2a, 2b, 2c, 2i, 2k, 4a, and 4d, showed numerous strains while subtypes in donors from West Africa or Central Africa showed an endemic profile with only a few strains. A Bayesian coalescence approach was used to estimate the demographic history of each HCV subtype. The estimated mean dates of the most recent common ancestors (MRCA) were 1,889 (confidence interval (CI), 1,842-1,930) for HCV-2a, 1,886 (CI, 1,843-1,921) for HCV-2b, 1,791 (CI, 1,699-1,848) for HCV-2c, 1,846 (CI, 1,803-1,878) for HCV-2i, 1,911 (CI, 1,879-1,937) for HCV-4a, and 1,957 (CI, 1,943-1,967) for HCV-4d. The period of spread for subtype 2b, 2c, and 2i was between 1900 and 1960 whereas rapid exponential spread for subtype 2a, 4a, and 4d occurred in the 1960s. The inferred histories of population growth indicated that transmission rates differed according to HCV subtype. These results may help to predict the future burden of HCV in France

Improvement of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype Determination with the New Version of the INNO-LiPA HCV Assay

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) isolates have been classified into six main genotypes. Genotyping methods, and especially the widely used line probe assay (LiPA), are frequently based on the 5′-untranslated region (5′UTR). However, this region is not appropriate for discriminating HCV strains at the subtype level and for distinguishing many genotype 6 samples from genotype 1. We investigated the capacity of a novel LiPA (Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay) based on the simultaneous detection of 5′UTR and Core regions for genotypes 1 and 6 to provide correct HCV genotypes (characterized with a phylogenetic analysis) in a set of HCV strains mainly encountered in Western countries. The improvement was assessed by comparing the results to those obtained with the previous version of the assay. Of the 135 tested samples, 64.7% were concordant for genotype group and subtype with sequencing reference results using the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay versus 37.5% with the previous version. The yield was mainly related to a better characterization of genotype 1, since the accuracy, tested in 62 genotype 1 samples, increased from 45.2% with the first version to 96.8% with the new one. However, this new version necessitates a specific PCR and could no longer be used after 5′UTR PCR used for current HCV infection diagnosis. Moreover, the information provided by 5′UTR hybridization is not reliable for correctly identifying the diversity within genotypes 2 and 4. Thus, the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay remains a useful tool for clinical practice when only the discrimination between major HCV genotypes is necessary

Simultaneous Detection of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Core Antigen and Anti-HCV Antibodies Improves the Early Detection of HCV Infection

To evaluate whether a new enzyme immunoassay developed for the simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (Ag) and anti-HCV antibodies (anti-HCV Ab) (Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA; Bio-Rad) could improve the early detection of HCV infection, we compared its sensitivity to that of anti-HCV, HCV core Ag, and HCV RNA assays. The populations studied included 12 blood donor samples positive for HCV RNA and HCV core Ag but negative for anti-HCV antibodies and 23 hemodialysis patients who developed anti-HCV Ab (seroconversion) during the follow-up. From these 23 individuals, 83 samples sequentially collected prior to seroconversion and 108 samples collected after seroconversion were tested. Six of 12 blood donations were positive by the HCV Ag/Ab assay. In the hemodialysis cohort, the 24 HCV RNA-negative samples were negative by the HCV Ag/Ab assay and 23 of the 59 HCV RNA-positive samples (39%) were positive. The HCV Ag/Ab assay detected HCV infection on average 21.6 days before the most sensitive antibody assay. The HCV Ag/Ab assay did not detect HCV infection as early as the HCV RNA assay (mean delay, 30.3 days) or HCV Ag assay (mean delays, 27.9, and 16.3 days by the HCV core Ag quantification assay and the HCV Ag blood screening assay, respectively). This new assay provides a notable improvement for the early detection of HCV infection during the so-called window period compared with anti-HCV Ab assays and could be a useful alternative to HCV RNA detection or HCV core Ag assays for diagnosis or blood screening when nucleic acid technologies or HCV core Ag detection are not implemented

Expertise of Laboratories in Viral Load Quantification, Genotyping, and Precore Mutant Determination for Hepatitis B Virus in a Multicenter Study

A national evaluation study was performed in 14 specialized laboratories with the objective of assessing their capacities to provide (i) hepatitis B virus (HBV) viral loads (VL), (ii) HBV genotypes, and(iii) identification of precore/core mutants. The panel consisted of 12 HBV DNA-positive samples with VLs from 2.8 to 9.1 log(10) copies/ml, different HBV genotypes (A to F), and 3 mutant and 9 wild-type samples at nucleotide 1896. The coefficients of variation of the mean VLs ranged from 2.4% to 10.4% with the Cobas HBV Monitor assay, from 1.8% to 5.5% with the Cobas TaqMan 48, from 1.5 to 26.2% with RealArt HBV PCR, and from 0 to 7% with branched DNA (bDNA). The Cobas Monitor assay underestimated the VLs of genotype F samples, with differences ranging from 1.4 to 2.4 log(10) copies/ml. The accuracies of genotype determinations ranged from 33% to 100%, and those of precore mutant determinations ranged from 25 to 100%. This study showed some drawbacks of two widely used assays: (i) Cobas Monitor has a narrow dynamic range and underestimates genotype F sample VLs and (ii) bDNA shows poor sensitivity and may fail to identify patients with low VLs. With higher performance in terms of analytical sensitivity combined with a larger dynamic range and an ability to quantify the main genotypes equally, real-time PCR methods appear more appropriate for accurate monitoring of HBV DNA quantification. Furthermore, the clinical implications of HBV genotyping and the determination of precore/core mutants need to be clearly stated to justify the standardization of these methods

Unique NS5b hepatitis C virus gene sequence consensus database is essential for standardization of genotype determinations in multicenter epidemiological studies

International audienceA multicenter study of NS5b hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype determination involving 12 laboratories demonstrates that any laboratory with expertise in sequencing techniques would be able to provide a reliable HCV genotype for clinical and epidemiological purposes as long as they are provided a consensus reference sequence database

Multicenter Trials Need To Use the Same Assay for Hepatitis C Virus Viral Load Determination▿

This study, involving 20 laboratories and using currently available assays for hepatitis C virus RNA quantification, demonstrated that differences in viral load values are due not to interlaboratory variations but rather to the nature of the assay itself. This underlines the importance of using the same assay in multicenter studies or when monitoring antiviral therapy