Non melanoma skin cancer pathogenesis overview

(1)Background: Non-melanoma skin cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in humans. The process of skin carcinogenesis is still not fully understood. However, several studies have been conducted to better explain the mechanisms that lead to malignancy; (2) Methods: We reviewed the more recent literature about the pathogenesis of non-melanoma skin cancer focusing on basal cell carcinomas, squamous cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis; (3) Results: Several papers reported genetic and molecular alterations leading to non-melanoma skin cancer. Plenty of risk factors are involved in non-melanoma skin cancer pathogenesis, including genetic and molecular alterations, immunosuppression, and ultraviolet radiation; (4) Conclusion: Although skin carcinogenesis is still not fully understood, several papers demonstrated that genetic and molecular alterations are involved in this process. In addition, plenty of non-melanoma skin cancer risk factors are now known, allowing for an effective prevention of non-melanoma skin cancer development. Compared to other papers on the same topic, our review focused on molecular and genetic factors and analyzed in detail several factors involved in non-melanoma skin cancer

The role of G-CSF in the treatment of advanced tumors

Commentary to:Peritumoral administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor induces an apoptotic response on a murine mammary adenocarcinomaJulieta Marino, Veronica A. Furmento, Elsa Zotta, Leonor P. Rogui

Neurodystrophic hand dermatitis: Sannino Barduagni syndrome

No abstract available</p

Clinicopathological predictive factors of melanoma lung metastases

Background: The lung is the second most common site for metastatic malignant melanoma, with a poor prognosis. In this regard, identify clinicopathological predictors for Melanoma Lung Metastases (MLM) plays a pivotal role in clinical practice. Methods: We computer-searched the clinical records of all our patients registered in our melanoma database to identify patients that presented MLM. Kaplan-Meier product was used to estimate time to MELANOMA LUNG METASTASES (TMLM) and Overall Survival (OS); while the log-rank test was used to evaluate differences between the survival curves. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed in the analysis between clinicopathological features of the primary tumor and MLM. Results: A total of 63 patients with MLM were included in our analysis. Median TMLM was 27.4 months, while median OS was 55.5 months, with a Median Lung Metastases Survival (MLMS) of 10 months. Melanoma patients with a primary axial tumor (p&lt;0.001) and with an age ≤ 60 years (p=0.01) showed a better TMLM. While OS was statistically significant higher only in axial melanomas (p&lt;0.001), multivariate analysis showed that peripheral site of the primary tumor remained the main predictor to develop MLM, with a significant influence in TMLM and also in the long-term (p&lt;0.01 and p=0.04). Conclusions: Currently no standardized therapies exist for MLM. In this regard, the prevention of secondary recurrences plays a pivotal role in the management of melanoma patients. According to our results, peripheral melanoma is the main predictor for development of MLM

An unusual case of neonatal mastocytoma

Mastocytosis is a group of disorders characterized by the accumulation of mast cells in various tissues. In this article we report an interesting case of cutaneous mastocytoma in a 3-month-old infant. We describe two episodes characterized by an exacerbation of the skin lesion with the typical Darier’s sign. Both of them occurred after breastfeeding. In both episodes, the mother had eaten shrimps before the breastfeeding. This peculiar case, difficult to understand regarding its pathogenesis, was successful resolved just with dietary prescription given to the breast feeding mother

Does 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT add value to positive parathyroid scintigraphy in the presurgical assessment of primary hyperparathyroidism?

IntroductionTo investigate the value of presurgical 18F-FCH PET/CT in detecting additional hyperfunctioning parathyroids despite a positive 99mTc-sestamibi parathyroid scintigraphy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT).MethodsThis is a retrospective study involving patients with pHPT, positive parathyroid scintigraphy performed before 18F-FCH PET/CT, and parathyroid surgery achieved after PET/CT. Imaging procedures were performed according to the EANM practice guidelines. Images were qualitatively interpreted as positive or negative. The number of pathological findings, their topography, and ectopic location were recorded. Histopathology, Miami criterion, and biological follow-up were considered to ensure effective parathyroidectomy confirming the complete excision of all hyperfunctioning glands. The impact of 18F-FCH PET/CT on therapeutic strategy was recorded.Results64/632 scanned pHPT patients (10%) were included in the analysis. According to a per lesion-based analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy were 82, 95, 87, and 93%, respectively. The same values for 18F-FCH PET/CT were 93, 99, 99, and 97%, respectively. 18F-FCH PET/CT showed a significantly higher global accuracy than 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy: 98% (CI: 95–99) vs. 91% (CI: 87–94%). Youden Index was 0.79 and 0.92 for 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy and 18F-FCH PET/CT, respectively. Scintigraphy and PET/CT were discordant in 13/64 (20%) patients (49 glands). 18F-FCH PET/CT identified nine pathologic parathyroids not detected by 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy in 8 patients (12.5%). Moreover, 18F-FCH PET/CT allowed the reconsideration of false-positive scintigraphic diagnosis (scinti+/PET-) for 8 parathyroids in 7 patients (11%). The 18F-FCH PET/CT influenced the surgical strategy in 7 cases (11% of the study population).ConclusionIn a preoperative setting, 18F-FCH PET/CT seems more accurate and useful than 99mTc-sestamibi scan in pHPT patients with positive scintigraphic results. Positive parathyroid scintigraphy could be not satisfactory before neck surgery particularly in patients with multiglandular disease, suggesting a need to evolve the practice and define new preoperative imaging algorithms including 18F-FCH PET/CT at the fore-front in pHPT patients

Daylight-Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis in Different Seasons

BACKGROUND: non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most common malignancy, whose public health significance is often unrecognized. Its incidence continues to grow at an alarming rate, becoming an occupational disease. Available treatments alternative to surgery include: photodynamic therapy, electrochemiotherapy, cryotherapy, ablative lasers, 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, and diclofenac. Each of these options has its advantages and disadvantages. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), using topically applied photosensitizer precursors such as methylaminolaevulinate (MAL), is a useful nonsurgical treatment, well accepted by patients, but the main limitation is pain. Recently, in order to overcome this limit, visible light irradiation photherapy was considered. AIM: we report our experience comparing conventional PDT (406 patients) with daylight-mediated PDT (D-PDT) 240 patients with multiple actinic keratoses (AK), afferent to our photodynamic outpatients clinic from September 2013 to June 2014. MATERIALS AND METHODS: to establish predictors for the clinical response to conventional PDT and daylight PDT (DPDT), a retrospective study on 646 patients was performed. The following parameters have been evaluated: sex, age, anatomic site of the primary tumor and local skin reactions. We used the Spearmen's coefficient between the clinical response and the predictors analyzed; while Odds Ratio (OR) was performed to evaluate general clinical response and local skin reaction between PDT and D-PDT patients. Subsequently, we performed a sub-analysis, focusing to the anatomical sites, and we subdivided anatomical sites in face and scalp, nose, trunk, and extremities. RESULTS: a total of 406 patients treated with PDT and 240 patients treated with D-PDT, were enrolled in the current report. The median age was 71 years in PDT and 73 years in D-PDT. The mean clinical response in PDT was of 74.4% and 95% in D-PDT. Performing OR between PDT and D-PDT, according to the clinical response, we found a better behavior in patients treated with D-PDT (P &lt; 0.03); the same significance was maintained according to the presence or absence of local skin reaction (P &lt; 0.0002). Using no parametric Spearman's Coefficient test among predictive factors and the therapeutical response we found that D-PDT showed a better clinical response in patients with AK size ≥0.6 mm (P &lt; 0.03), while this evidence was not present in PDT. The nose remained in both PDT and DPDT the main anatomical site with a better clinical response to the treatment. CONCLUSION: Since efficacy of D-PDT is comparable or superior to conventional type, but is simpler and better appreciated by patients, in our opinion it may be used routinely to treat sun exposed multiple AKs especially in sun damaged skin also for aesthetic purposes. J Drugs Dermatol. 2015;14(11):1349-1353