Cancer risk from professional exposure in staff working in cardiac catheterization laboratory: Insights from the National Research Council\u27s Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII Report

Background Occupational doses from fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures are the highest ones registered among medical staff using x-rays. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the order of magnitude of cancer risk caused by professional radiation exposure in modern invasive cardiology practice. Methods From the dosimetric Tuscany Health Physics data bank of 2006, we selected dosimetric data of the 26 (7 women, 19 men; age 46 ? 9 years) workers of the cardiovascular catheterization laboratory with effective dose N2 mSv. Effective dose (E) was expressed in milliSievert, calculated from personal dose equivalent registered by the thermoluminescent dosimeter, at waist or chest, under the apron, according to the recommendations of National Council of Radiation Protection. Lifetime attributable risk of cancer was estimated using the approach of Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation 2006 report VII. Results Cardiac catheterization laboratory staff represented 67% of the 6 workers with yearly exposure N6 mSv. Of the 26 workers with 2006 exposure N2 mSv, 15 of them had complete records of at least 10 (up to 25) consecutive years. For these 15 subjects having a more complete lifetime dosimetric history, the median individual effective dose was 46 mSv (interquartile range = 24-64). The median risk of (fatal and nonfatal) cancer (Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation 2006) was 1 in 192 (interquartile range = 1 in 137-1 in 370). Conclusions Cumulative professional radiological exposure is associated with a non-negligible Lifetime attributable risk of cancer for the most exposed contemporary cardiac catheterization laboratory staff

Prothrombotic mutations, family history and the risk of thrombosis in postmenopausal women: implications for hormone replacement therapy

Objective Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is acknowledged as the gold standard for the alleviation of climacteric vasomotor symptoms. Prothrombotic genetic variants have been suggested to increase thrombotic risk among HRT users. The aim of the study was to determine whether a positive family history may identify a genetic predisposition for thrombosis in women before prescribing HRT. Methods From January 2005 to May 2009, we consecutively enrolled 145 asymptomatic women (mean age 51.2+5.4 years) without previous episodes of venous and/or arterial thrombosis referred to our Genetics Research Unit before starting HRT. A detailed family history was reconstructed and we identified 48 women (33.1%) with a positive family history, defined as venous thromboembolism and/or stroke or heart attack, in first-degree relatives before 60 years for men and 65 years for women. A group of 121 women (mean age 54.0+9.1 years) with an episode of venous and/or arterial thrombosis was also included. Genetic screening for factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphisms was performed. Results The frequency of factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutations was significantly higher both in asymptomatic women with a positive family history (16.7% vs. 2.1%, p?0.001) and in patients with thrombosis (12.4% vs. 2.1%; p?0.005) compared with asymptomatic women without a family history. Multivariate regression analysis showed a synergic effect between the presence of one prothrombotic mutation and family history on the risk of thrombosis (odds ratio 3.7, 95% confidence interval 1.9-7.2). Conclusions A positive family history of thrombosis is a sensitive indicator for selected genetic testing in high-risk women before starting HRT

Sequencing of NOTCH1, GATA5, TGFBR1 and TGFBR2genes in familial cases of bicuspid aortic valve

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to investigate the potential contribution of germline mutations in NOTCH1, GATA5 and TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 genes in a cohort of Italian patients with familial Bicuspid Aortic Valve (BAV). METHODS: All the coding exons including adjacent intronic as well as 5(′) and 3(′) untranslated (UTR) sequences of NOTCH1, GATA5, TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 genes were screened by direct gene sequencing in 11 index patients (8 males; age = 42 ± 19 years) with familial BAV defined as two or more affected members. RESULTS: Two novel mutations, a missense and a nonsense mutation (Exon 5, p.P284L; Exon 26, p.Y1619X), were found in the NOTCH1 gene in two unrelated families. The mutations segregated with the disease in these families, and they were not found on 200 unrelated chromosomes from ethnically matched controls. No pathogenetic mutation was identified in GATA5, TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 genes. CONCLUSIONS: Two novel NOTCH1 mutations were identified in two Italian families with BAV, highlighting the role of a NOTCH1 signaling pathway in BAV and its aortic complications. These findings are of relevance for genetic counseling and clinical care of families presenting with BAV. Future studies are needed in order to unravel the still largely unknown genetics of BAV

A novel LMNA mutation (R189W) in familial dilated cardiomyopathy: evidence for a 'hot spot' region at exon 3: a case report

We describe a case of a patient with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and cardiac conduction abnormalities who presented a strong family history of sudden cardiac death. Genetic screening of lamin A/C gene revealed in proband the presence of a novel missense mutation (R189W), near the most prevalent lamin A/C mutation (R190W), suggesting a "hot spot" region at exon 3

Colorectal Cancer Stage at Diagnosis Before vs During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy

IMPORTANCE Delays in screening programs and the reluctance of patients to seek medical attention because of the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 could be associated with the risk of more advanced colorectal cancers at diagnosis. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was associated with more advanced oncologic stage and change in clinical presentation for patients with colorectal cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included all 17 938 adult patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer from March 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021 (pandemic period), and from January 1, 2018, to February 29, 2020 (prepandemic period), in 81 participating centers in Italy, including tertiary centers and community hospitals. Follow-up was 30 days from surgery. EXPOSURES Any type of surgical procedure for colorectal cancer, including explorative surgery, palliative procedures, and atypical or segmental resections. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was advanced stage of colorectal cancer at diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were distant metastasis, T4 stage, aggressive biology (defined as cancer with at least 1 of the following characteristics: signet ring cells, mucinous tumor, budding, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and lymphangitis), stenotic lesion, emergency surgery, and palliative surgery. The independent association between the pandemic period and the outcomes was assessed using multivariate random-effects logistic regression, with hospital as the cluster variable. RESULTS A total of 17 938 patients (10 007 men [55.8%]; mean [SD] age, 70.6 [12.2] years) underwent surgery for colorectal cancer: 7796 (43.5%) during the pandemic period and 10 142 (56.5%) during the prepandemic period. Logistic regression indicated that the pandemic period was significantly associated with an increased rate of advanced-stage colorectal cancer (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95%CI, 1.01-1.13; P = .03), aggressive biology (OR, 1.32; 95%CI, 1.15-1.53; P < .001), and stenotic lesions (OR, 1.15; 95%CI, 1.01-1.31; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study suggests a significant association between the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the risk of a more advanced oncologic stage at diagnosis among patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer and might indicate a potential reduction of survival for these patients

Radiological exposure in contemporary interventional cardiologists

Background: Occupational doses in interventional procedures guided by fluoroscopy are the highest doses registered among medical staff using x-rays. The recent Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR VII) report provides a framework for estimating the lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer incidence from professional radiation exposure using the most current data on the health effects of radiation. Aim: to evaluate the order of magnitude of cancer risk due to professional radiation exposure in contemporary invasive cardiology practice. Methods: We interrogated the dosimetric data bank of Pisa health Physics Department, collecting data of over 2,000 exposed health professionals. We selected dosimetric data of the last 10 years (1996-2005). Effective dose (E) was expressed in milliSievert calculated from personal dose equivalent from thermoluminescent dosimetry, under apron. Whole-body LARs was estimated using the approach of BEIR VII. Results: Among the health professionals with the highest exposure, the absolute majority worked in the cath lab (see figure). For top-10 exposed staff, the median cumulative 10-year effective dose was 30-60 mSv per person, equivalent to 1,500-3,000 chest x-rays and about 15-30 years of natural background exposure. This dose gave an estimated median LAR of (fatal and non-fatal) cancer in the range of 1 cancer in 200-1 in 600 for 10 years of work in the cath lab. Conclusions: For the most experienced (and most exposed) "top-gun" interventional cardiologists, contemporary professional radiological exposure is associated with a non-negligible LAR of cancer. A substantial proportion of this risk can be abated with reduction of inappropriate examinations, careful optimization of procedures and implementation of simple radioprotection measures