A mediação e conciliação como formas eficazes de resolução dos conflitos familiares / Mediation and conciliation as effective ways to resolve family conflicts

A mediação e a conciliação são métodos capazes de resgatar o diálogo entre as pessoas, que através desses institutos podem discutir, e juntas chegarem à solução de suas contendas. Nesse sentido, torna-se importante conceituar a mediação e a conciliação aos olhos do direito brasileiro, a fim de diferenciá-las e mostrar sua importância frente aos conflitos e as partes envolvidas, pois, é a partir da análise minuciosa de cada conflito é que se deve traçar um caminho para soluciona-lo, garantindo, assim, a continuação da convivência pacífica entre as partes e uma prestação jurídica eficaz. O presente artigo pretende mostrar a importância da mediação e da conciliação na resolução de litigio familiares. Para tal, faremos uma abordagem sobre a autocomposição na legislação brasileira, mostrando o conceito de cada instituto e suas particularidades. Em seguida, abordaremos sobre a sociedade familiar e o direito, elencando os tipos de famílias e a origem dos conflitos familiares. A partir daí, fez-se uma abordagem acerca da utilização da mediação e da conciliação na pacificação dos litígios de família, mostrando os aspectos positivos e negativos de cada um desses métodos na resolução dos conflitos e, a importância do acordo para a continuação da convivência familiar.

Efeitos da etcc sobre o aprendizado motor em pessoas com doença de Parkinson / Effects of cts on motor learning in people with parkinson's disease

ASCHERIO, Alberto; SCHWARZSCHILD, Michael A. The epidemiology of Parkinson's disease: risk factors and prevention. The Lancet Neurology, v. 15, n. 12, p. 1257-1272, 2016. BENNINGER, David H.; HALLETT, Mark. Non-invasive brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: current concepts and outlook 2015. NeuroRehabilitation, v. 37, n. 1, p. 11-24,2015. BRUNONI, Andre Russowsky et al. A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, v. 14, n. 8, p. 1133-1145, 2011. CACABELOS, Ramón. Parkinson’s disease: from pathogenesis to pharmacogenomics.International journal of molecular sciences, v. 18, n. 3, p. 551, 2017. CHEN, Kai‐Hsiang Stanley; CHEN, Robert. Invasive and non‐invasive brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: Clinical effects and future perspectives. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2019. CHRISTOVA, Monica; RAFOLT, Dietmar; GALLASCH, Eugen. Cumulative effects of anodal and priming cathodal tDCS on pegboard test performance and motor cortical excitability. Behavioural brain research, v. 287, p. 27-33, 2015. FOX, Susan H. et al. International Parkinson and movement disorder society evidence‐based medicine review: Update on treatments for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease.Movement Disorders, v. 33, n. 8, p. 1248-1266, 2018. FREGNI, Felipe et al. Noninvasive cortical stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Movement disorders, v. 21, n. 10, p. 1693-1702, 2006. GRÜNER, Ulrike et al. 1 Hz rTMS preconditioned by tDCS over the primary motor cortex in Parkinson’s disease: effects on bradykinesia of arm and hand. Journal of neural transmission, v. 117, n. 2, p. 207-216, 2010. HAYES, Michael W. et al. Updates and advances in the treatment of Parkinson disease. The Medical journal of Australia, 2019. HUANG, Sheau-Ling et al. Minimal detectable change of the timed “up & go” test and the dynamic gait index in people with Parkinson disease. Physical Therapy, v. 91, n. 1, p. 114- 121, 2011. JONES, Sarah E. et al. The five-repetition sit-to-stand test as a functional outcome measure in COPD. Thorax, p. 203- 576, 2013. LANG, Nicolas et al. Preconditioning with transcranial direct current stimulation sensitizes the motor cortex to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation and controls the direction of after- effects. Biological psychiatry, v. 56, n. 9, p. 634-639, 2004.LEE, Hyo Keun et al. Does transcranial direct current stimulation improve functional locomotion in people with Parkinson’s disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Neuroengineering and rehabilitation, v.16, n.1, p.84-96, 2019. LEFAUCHEUR, Jean-Pascal et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clinical Neurophysiology, v. 128, n. 1, p. 56- 92, 2017. PAPEN, Mitra Von et al. The effects of 1 Hz rTMS preconditioned by tDCS on gait kinematics in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neural Transmission, v. 121, n. 7, p. 743-754, 2014. SCHNEIDER, Ruth B.; IOURINETS, Julia; RICHARD, Irene H. Parkinson's disease psychosis: presentation, diagnosis and management. Neurodegenerative disease management, v. 7, n. 6, p. 365-376, 2017. OPARA, Józef et al. Motor assessment in Parkinsons disease. Ann Agric Environ Med, v. 24, n. 3, p. 411-415, 2017. PETERS, Denise M.; FRITZ, Stacy L.; KROTISH, Debra E. Assessing the reliability and validity of a shorter walk test compared with the 10-Meter Walk Test for measurements of gait speed in healthy, older adults. Journal of geriatric physical therapy, v. 36, n. 1, p. 24-30, 2013. REICH, S.G., SAVITT, J.M. Parkinson's Disease. MedIcal Clinics of North America. v. 103 n. 2, p. 337-350, 2018. RIBEIRO, Adriana Costa et al. Dopamine-independent effects of combining transcranial direct current stimulation with cued gait training on cortical excitability and functional mobility in Parkinson's disease. Journal of rehabilitation medicine, v. 48, n. 9, p. 819-823, 2016. RIBEIRO, Adriana Costa et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation associated with gait training in Parkinson’s disease: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Developmental neurorehabilitation, v. 20, n. 3, p. 121-128, 2017. TYSNES, Ole-Bjørn; STORSTEIN, Anette. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neural Transmission, v. 124, n. 8, p. 901-905, 2017. VALENTINO, Francesca et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment of freezing of gait: A cross‐over study. Movement Disorders, v. 29, n. 8, p. 1064-1069, 2014

Núcleos de Ensino da Unesp: artigos 2008

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq

Brazilian Flora 2020: Leveraging the power of a collaborative scientific network

International audienceThe shortage of reliable primary taxonomic data limits the description of biological taxa and the understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes, complicating biogeographical, ecological, and evolutionary studies. This deficit creates a significant taxonomic impediment to biodiversity research and conservation planning. The taxonomic impediment and the biodiversity crisis are widely recognized, highlighting the urgent need for reliable taxonomic data. Over the past decade, numerous countries worldwide have devoted considerable effort to Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC), which called for the preparation of a working list of all known plant species by 2010 and an online world Flora by 2020. Brazil is a megadiverse country, home to more of the world's known plant species than any other country. Despite that, Flora Brasiliensis, concluded in 1906, was the last comprehensive treatment of the Brazilian flora. The lack of accurate estimates of the number of species of algae, fungi, and plants occurring in Brazil contributes to the prevailing taxonomic impediment and delays progress towards the GSPC targets. Over the past 12 years, a legion of taxonomists motivated to meet Target 1 of the GSPC, worked together to gather and integrate knowledge on the algal, plant, and fungal diversity of Brazil. Overall, a team of about 980 taxonomists joined efforts in a highly collaborative project that used cybertaxonomy to prepare an updated Flora of Brazil, showing the power of scientific collaboration to reach ambitious goals. This paper presents an overview of the Brazilian Flora 2020 and provides taxonomic and spatial updates on the algae, fungi, and plants found in one of the world's most biodiverse countries. We further identify collection gaps and summarize future goals that extend beyond 2020. Our results show that Brazil is home to 46,975 native species of algae, fungi, and plants, of which 19,669 are endemic to the country. The data compiled to date suggests that the Atlantic Rainforest might be the most diverse Brazilian domain for all plant groups except gymnosperms, which are most diverse in the Amazon. However, scientific knowledge of Brazilian diversity is still unequally distributed, with the Atlantic Rainforest and the Cerrado being the most intensively sampled and studied biomes in the country. In times of “scientific reductionism”, with botanical and mycological sciences suffering pervasive depreciation in recent decades, the first online Flora of Brazil 2020 significantly enhanced the quality and quantity of taxonomic data available for algae, fungi, and plants from Brazil. This project also made all the information freely available online, providing a firm foundation for future research and for the management, conservation, and sustainable use of the Brazilian funga and flora