Tumeurs endobronchiques primitives de l'enfant (étude rétrospective sur 20 ans)

TOURS-BU Médecine (372612103) / SudocSudocFranceF

Impact du traitement par pompe à insuline à la découverte du diabète versus schema conventionnel chez l'enfant

TOURS-BU Médecine (372612103) / SudocSudocFranceF

Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Reduces the Duration of Hypoglycemia Episodes: A Randomized Trial in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates

<div><p>Objectives</p><p>Hypoglycemia is frequent in very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates and compromises their neurological outcome. The aim of this study was to compare real-time continuous glucose monitoring system (RT-CGMS) to standard methods by intermittent capillary blood glucose testing in detecting and managing hypoglycemia.</p><p>Study design</p><p>Forty-eight VLBW neonates were enrolled in this prospective study. During their 3 first days of life, their glucose level was monitored either by RT-CGMS (CGM-group), or by intermittent capillary glucose testing (IGM-group) associated with a blind-CGMS to detect retrospectively missed hypoglycemia. Outcomes were the number and duration of hypoglycemic (≤50mg/dl) episodes per patient detected by CGMS.</p><p>Results</p><p>Forty-three monitorings were analyzed (IGM n = 21, CGM n = 22), with a median recording time of 72 hours. In the IGM group, blind-CGMS revealed a significantly higher number of hypoglycemia episodes than capillary blood glucose testing (1.2±0.4 vs 0.4±0.2 episode/patient, p<0.01). In the CGM-group, the use of RT-CGMS made it possible (i) to detect the same number of hypoglycemia episodes as blind-CGMS (1.2±0.4 episode/patient), (ii) to adapt the glucose supply in neonates with hypoglycemia (increased supply during days 1 and 2), and (iii) to significantly reduce the duration of hypoglycemia episodes per patient (CGM 44[10–140] min versus IGM 95[15–520] min, p<0.05). Furthermore, it reduced the number of blood samples (CGM 16.9±1.0 vs IGM 21.9±1.0 blood sample/patient, p<0.001).</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>RT-CGMS played a beneficial role in managing hypoglycemia in VLBW neonates by adjusting the carbohydrate supply to the individual needs and by reducing the duration of hypoglycemia episodes. The clinical significance of the biological differences observed in our study need to be explored.</p></div

Daily carbohydrate supplies in IGM- and CGM-group.

<p>Results, expressed as mean ± SE, represent daily carbohydrate supplies during the first 4 days of life in IGM versus CGM-group (A), and in patients with (HYPO) versus without (NORMO) hypoglycemia in each group (B and C); *p<0.05.</p

Comparison between IGM- and CGM-group: number of heel pricks, number and duration of hypoglycemic episodes per patient.

<p>Number of heel pricks per patient for capillary blood glucose testing (A), number (B) and duration (C) of hypoglycemic episodes per patient. Results are expressed as mean ± SE (A and B) or as median, 25% and 75% percentiles (box) and extreme values (whisker) (C) *p<0.05, ***p<0.001.</p

Characteristics of the 48 very low birth weight newborns with intermittent (IGM) or continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).

<p>Results are expressed as number of patients (%) or median [min-max].</p><p>*p<0.05</p><p>Characteristics of the 48 very low birth weight newborns with intermittent (IGM) or continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).</p

Outcomes of hybrid closed‐loop insulin delivery activated 24/7 versus evening and night in free‐living prepubertal children with type 1 diabetes: A multicentre, randomized clinical trial

International audienceAims: To assess the safety and efficacy of hybrid closed-loop (HCL) insulin delivery 24/7 vs. only evening and night (E/N), and on extended 24/7 use, in free-living children with T1D.Materials and methods: Pre-pubertal children (n = 122; 49F/73M, age: 8.6 ± 1.6, diabetes duration: 5.2 ± 2.3 years, insulin pump use: 4.6 ± 2.5 years, HbA1c: 7.7 ± 0.7%/61 ± 5 mmol/mol) from 4 centers were randomized for 24/7 vs. E/N activation of the Tandem Control-IQ system for 18 weeks. Afterwards, all children used the activated system 24/7 for 18 more weeks. Primary outcome was %time spent in 70-180 mg/dL glucose range (TIR).Results: HCL was active 94.1% and 51.1% of time on 24/7 and E/N modes, respectively. TIR from baseline increased more on 24/7 vs. E/N: 52.9 ± 9.5 to 67.3 ± 5.6 (+14.4%, 95CI: 12.4-16.7%) vs. 55.1 ± 10.8 to 64.7 ± 7.0 (+9.6%, 95CI: 7.4-11.6%), p = 0.001. Mean %time below range was similarly reduced from 4.2 and 4.6 to 2.7, and mean %time above range more on 24/7 mode: 41.9 to 30.0 (-11.9%, 95CI: 9.7-14.6%) vs. 39.8 to 32.6 (-7.2%, 95CI: 5.0-9.9%), p = 0.007. TIR increased through the whole range of baseline levels and always more with 24/7 use. The results were maintained during extension phase in those initially on 24/7 use and improved in those with initial E/N use up to those with 24/7 use. Neither ketoacidosis nor severe hypoglycemia occurred.Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of Tandem Control-IQ system in free-living children with T1D for both E/N and 24/7 use. 24/7 use shows better outcomes, sustained for up to 36 weeks with no safety issue. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Hybrid Closed Loop Overcomes the Impact of Missed or Suboptimal Meal Boluses on Glucose Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Compared to Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy

International audienceBackground: It is unclear whether hybrid closed-loop (HCL) therapy attenuates the metabolic impact of missed or suboptimal meal insulin bolus compared with sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy in children with type 1 diabetes in free-living conditions. Methods: This is an ancillary study from a multicenter randomized controlled trial that compared 24/7 HCL with evening and night (E/N) HCL for 36 weeks in children between 6 and 12 years old. In the present study, the 60 children from the E/N arm underwent a SAP phase, an E/N HCL for 18 weeks, then a 24/7 phase for 18 weeks, extended for 36 more weeks. The last 28-30 days of each of the four phases were analyzed according to meal bolus management (cumulated 6817 days). The primary endpoint was the percentage of time that the sensor glucose was in the target range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL) according to the number of missed boluses per day. Findings: TIR was 54% ± 10% with SAP, 63% ± 7% with E/N HCL, and steadily 67% ± 7% with 24/7 HCL. From the SAP phase to 72 weeks of HCL, the percentage of days with at least one missed meal bolus increased from 12% to 22%. Estimated marginal (EM) mean TIR when no bolus was missed was 54% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 53-56) in SAP and it was 13% higher (95% CI 11-15) in the 24/7 HCL phase. EM mean TIR with 1 and ≥2 missed boluses/day was 49.5% (95% CI 46-52) and 45% (95% CI 39-51) in SAP, and it was 15% (95% CI 14-16) and 17% higher (95% CI 6-28), respectively, in the 24/7 HCL phase (P < 0.05 for all comparisons vs. SAP). Interpretation: HCL persistently improves glycemic control compared with SAP, even in case of meal bolus omission. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03739099)