4 research outputs found

    Validating left atrial fractionation and low-voltage substrate during atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm-A high-density mapping study in persistent atrial fibrillation

    Get PDF
    Altres ajuts: Deutsche Herzstiftung (German Heart Foundation).Background: Low-voltage-substrate (LVS)-guided ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has been described either in sinus rhythm (SR) or AF. Prolonged fractionated potentials (PFPs) may represent arrhythmogenic slow conduction substrate and potentially co-localize with LVS. We assess the spatial correlation of PFP identified in AF (PFP-AF) to those mapped in SR (PFP-SR). We further report the relationship between LVS and PFPs when mapped in AF or SR. Materials and methods: Thirty-eight patients with ablation naïve persistent AF underwent left atrial (LA) high-density mapping in AF and SR prior to catheter ablation. Areas presenting PFP-AF and PFP-SR were annotated during mapping on the LA geometry. Low-voltage areas (LVA) were quantified using a bipolar threshold of 0.5 mV during both AF and SR mapping. Concordance of fractionated potentials (CFP) (defined as the presence of PFPs in both rhythms within a radius of 6 mm) was quantified. Spatial distribution and correlation of PFP and CFP with LVA were assessed. The predictors for CFP were determined. Results: PFPs displayed low voltages both during AF (median 0.30 mV (Q1-Q3: 0.20-0.50 mV) and SR (median 0.35 mV (Q1-Q3: 0.20-0.56 mV). The duration of PFP-SR was measured at 61 ms (Q1-Q3: 51-76 ms). During SR, most PFP-SRs (89.4 and 97.2%) were located within LVA (40%), followed by posterior LA (>20%) and septal LA (>15%). The extent of LVA 80%) fractionation concordance in AF and SR. Conclusion: Substrate mapping in SR vs. AF reveals smaller areas of low voltage and fewer sites with PFP. PFP-SR are located within low-voltage areas in SR. There is a high degree of spatial agreement (80%) between PFP-AF and PFP-SR in patients with moderate LVA in SR (>16% of LA surface). These findings should be considered when substrate-based ablation strategies are applied in patients with the left atrial low-voltage substrate with recurrent persistent AF

    Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Determinants of Atrial Cardiomyopathy Identify Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at Risk for Left Atrial Thrombogenesis

    No full text
    Objective: Atrial cardiomyopathy (ACM) is associated with development of AF, left atrial (LA) thrombogenesis, and stroke. Diagnosis of ACM is feasible using both echocardiographic LA strain imaging and measurement of the amplified p-wave duration (APWD) in digital 12-lead-ECG. We sought to determine the thresholds of LA global longitudinal strain (LA-GLS) and APWD that identify patients with AF at risk for LA appendage (LAA) thrombogenesis. Methods: One hundred and twenty-eight patients with a history of AF were included. Left atrial appendage maximal flow velocity (LAA-Vel, in TEE), LA-GLS (TTE), and APWD (digital 12-lead-ECG) were measured in all patients. ROC analysis was performed for each method to determine the thresholds for LA-GLS and the APWD, enabling diagnosis of patients with LAA-thrombus. Results: Significant differences in LA-GLS were found during both rhythms (SR and AF) between the thrombus group and control group: LA-GLS in SR: 14.3 ± 7.4% vs. 24.6 ± 9.0%, p < 0.001 and in AF: 11.4 ± 4.2% vs. 16.1 ± 5.0%, p = 0.045. ROC analysis revealed a threshold of 17.45% for the entire cohort (AUC 0.82, sensitivity: 84.6%, specificity: 63.6%, Negative Predictive Value (NPV): 94.3%) with additional rhythm-specific thresholds: 19.1% in SR and 13.9% in AF, and a threshold of 165 ms for APWD (AUC 0.90, sensitivity: 88.5%, specificity: 75.5%, NPV: 96.2%) as optimal discriminators of LAA-thrombus. Moreover, both LA-GLS and APWD correlated well with the established contractile LA-parameter LAA-Vel in TEE (r = 0.39, p < 0.001 and r = −0.39, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: LA-GLS and APWD are valuable diagnostic predictors of left atrial thrombogenesis in patients with AF

    Growth after late-preterm birth and adult cognitive, academic, and mental health outcomes

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background: Late-preterm birth (at 340/7–366/7 wk gestation) increases the risk of early growth faltering, poorer neurocognitive functioning, and lower socio-economic attainment. Among early-preterm individuals, faster early growth benefits neurodevelopment, but it remains unknown whether these benefits extend to late-preterm individuals. Methods: In 108 late-preterm individuals, we examined if weight, head, or length growth between birth, 5 and 20 months’ corrected age, and 56 mo, predicted grade point average and special education in comprehensive school, or neurocognitive abilities and psychiatric diagnoses/symptoms at 24–26 y of age. Results:For every 1 SD faster weight and head growth from birth to 5 mo, and head growth from 5 to 20 mo, participants had 0.19–0.41 SD units higher IQ, executive functioning score, and grade point average (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.002–0.59 SD), and lower odds of special education (odds ratio (OR) = 0.49–0.59, 95% CIs 0.28–0.97), after adjusting for sex, gestational age, follow-up age, and parental education. Faster head growth from 20 to 56 mo was associated with less internalizing problems; otherwise we found no consistent associations with mental health outcomes. Conclusion: Faster growth during the critical early period after late-preterm birth is associated with better adult neurocognitive functioning, but not consistently with mental health outcomes
    corecore