7 research outputs found

    Crafting representations of rare disease: collage as qualitative inquiry

    No full text
    BackgroundCollage is a modality of expression which involves repurposing and juxtaposing fragments. Our aim was to explore both how and what collage, as an arts-based research method, might contribute to enlivening understandings of the experiences of families affected by rare conditions.MethodsDuring 10 weeks of collaging workshops participants created artistic representations of their experiences. The methodology produced a convivial atmosphere where participants talked openly about everyday challenges.ResultsThe collages and conversations produced offer a means through which to consider the complex and multiple positions which families affected by rare disease interpolate. Particularly, the collages prompt cross-cutting thematic reflections on motherhood and care, the challenges of being heard, and balancing family life alongside medicalisation.ConclusionsThe opportunity to convey topics and feelings through a medium which was both tentatively open yet conceptually complex allowed the broaching of sensitive and elusive themes in a safe, expressive, and non-threatening manner.</p

    Healthcare professionals’ and patients’ perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: moving towards a more relational approach

    Get PDF
    Background: This paper proposes a refocusing of consent for clinical genetic testing, moving away from an emphasis on autonomy and information provision, towards an emphasis on the virtues of healthcare professionals seeking consent, and the relationships they construct with their patients. Methods: We draw on focus groups with UK healthcare professionals working in the field of clinical genetics, as well as in-depth interviews with patients who have sought genetic testing in the UK’s National Health Service (data collected 2013–2015). We explore two aspects of consent: first, how healthcare professionals consider the act of ‘consenting’patients; and second how these professional accounts, along with the accounts of patients, deepen our understanding of the consent process. Results: Our findings suggest that while healthcare professionals working in genetic medicine put much effort into ensuring patients’understanding about their impending genetic test, they acknowledge, and we show, that patients can still leave genetic consultations relatively uninformed. Moreover, we show how placing emphasis on the informational aspect of genetic testing is not always reflective of, or valuable to, patients’decision-making. Rather, decision-making is socially contextualises–also based on factors outside of information provision. Conclusions: A more collaborative on-going consent process, grounded in virtue ethics and values of honesty,openness and trustworthiness, is proposed
    corecore