4 research outputs found
Promoting bio-based building materials as a means of bridging the urban-rural divide in Serbia
Due to the difficult economic situation within Serbia, rural areas find themselves on the margins of investment and development, creating a deep rural-urban divide. Much of Serbia can be characterized as rural with a large segment of the population living in rural settlements defined by socio-economic stagnation or degradation. Revitalizing rural regions is thus important for the socio-economic wellbeing of the entire country and mitigating the rural-urban divide can be key to the sustainable development of urban areas. Much of the built environment in Serbia has a low level of energy efficiency and though public perception has improved, the focus is on improving operational energy, while the embodied environmental impact of building materials is rarely considered. This paper details and analyses the main problems facing rural areas in Serbia. As agriculture is still the primary economic activity in rural areas, it suggests that the development and application of
bio-based building materials created from the by-products of agriculture, can be an important element of further strategies for sustainable development in Serbia. In particular industrial hemp, which was once an important and abundant crop in Serbia, is currently experiencing a significant resurgence. This paper demonstrates that hemp-lime concrete may be a particularly suitable building material for encouraging new economic activity in rural areas and promoting sustainable design in both rural and urban areas
Creating life cycle assessment models for hemp lime concrete in the context of Serbia
ΠΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠ° ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠ½Π° Π·Π° Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠ½Π΅ Π΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ Π½Π΅Π³Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ ΡΡΠΈΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½Ρ
ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½Ρ. Π‘ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΡΠ° ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°ΠΌΠ° ΠΈ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠΌ Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ
Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π»Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Ρ. ΠΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΠΈ Π½Π°
Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρ Π±ΠΈΡΠΈ Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρ Π΄Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠΈΠ²Π΅ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅
ΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΎΡΠ° Π²Π΅Π·ΡΡΡ ΡΠ³ΡΠ΅Π½ Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ΄ ΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ Π²Π΅ΠΊΠ° ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π³ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈ. Π’ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΌ XX ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ XXI Π²Π΅ΠΊΠ° ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΡΠΊΠ΅
Π΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅ Ρ Π³ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΊΠΎΡ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈ Ρ Π‘ΡΠ±ΠΈΡΠΈ. Π£Π²ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΌ βΠΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ° Π·Π°
Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΡΠΊΡ Π΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡ Π·Π³ΡΠ°Π΄Π°β Ρ 2011. Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ°Π½ ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ Π·Π° ΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅
ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½Π΅ Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°, Π°Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈ ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ° Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠ΅
ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ ΡΡ ΠΈ Π΄Π°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Π»Π½ΠΎ Π·Π°ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ. Π£ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎ ΡΠ° ΡΠ²Π΅ Π²Π΅ΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π·Π° ΡΠ·Π³ΠΎΡ
ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅, Π±Π΅ΡΠΎΠ½ ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π»Π½ΠΎ Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ
ΠΈΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π°Π½ Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π» ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΈ Ρ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π΄ΡΠΈ, Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΡΠΊΠΎΡ ΡΠ°Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΈ
ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ° ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ° Π³ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ Π½Π°ΡΠ»Π΅ΡΠ°. Π€ΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°
ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅ ΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌ Π²Π΅Π·ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΌ Π½Π° Π±Π°Π·ΠΈ ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π²Π°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΈ Π·Π°
ΠΈΠ·Π³ΡΠ°Π΄ΡΡ Π·ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π° Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΠ° Π΄ΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠΊΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π» ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΈΠ²Π°. ΠΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΌ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π΅ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ ΡΠΈΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ° ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΠ° Π΄Π° Π΄Π΅ΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ Π²Π΅ΠΊΠ° Π±Π΅ΡΠΎΠ½Π° ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΡ Π‘ΡΠ±ΠΈΡΠ΅. ΠΡΠΎΠ· ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅
ΠΈΡΠΏΠΈΡΡΡΡ Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ Π²Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΠΊΡΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ° Π²Π΅Π·ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° CO2 Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΡΡ,
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ±ΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π²Π΅Π·ΠΈΠ²Π°, ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅, ΡΠ°Π·Π΄Π°ΡΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ·Π° ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Π° Π½Π°
Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π΄Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ·Π³ΡΠ°Π΄ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π° ΡΡ ΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½Π°
ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΊ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°Ρ Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ ΡΠΈΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ° Π·ΠΈΠ΄Π° ΠΎΠ΄ Π±Π΅ΡΠΎΠ½Π° ΠΎΠ΄
ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ°. ΠΡΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΡΡ ΠΈ Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ³ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΠ°Π·Π³ΡΠ°Π΄ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΡΠ° Π½Π° ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ Π²Π΅ΠΊΠ°, ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π±ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π±Π΅ΡΠΎΠ½Π° ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Ρ Π±Π»ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΠ°
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π΄Π΅ Π·ΠΈΠ΄Π°. ΠΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ° ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΈΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΡΠ½Π΅ Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ Ρ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π΄ΡΠΈ ΠΈ
ΡΠ°Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠ±Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ° Ρ Π‘ΡΠ±ΠΈΡΠΈ, ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π° ΡΠ΅ Π±Π΅ΡΠΎΠ½ ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π°Π½
Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π» ΠΈ Π΄Π° ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΡΠ°Π½ Ρ Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠΌ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΌ Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ°.The construction industry is responsible for significant emissions of substances that negatively impact the
environment. Faced with climate change and other environmental issues, the use of more environmentally
sustainable building materials has become a high priority. Bio-based building materials can be
environmentally sustainable as they can make use of renewable raw materials that sequester carbon dioxide
through photosynthesis and can biodegrade or be recycled at end of life. During the XX century and
beginning of the XXI century the concepts of environmental sustainability and energy efficiency werenβt
particularly considered in the Serbian construction industry. With the implementation of the βRulebook for
the energy efficiency of buildingsβ in 2011 a framework for the reduction of operational energy in buildings
was formed, but the embodied environmental impacts of construction practices are still formally neglected.
In conjuction with the rising interest for growing industrial hemp, hemp-lime concrete is identified as a
potentially environmentally sustainable building material that can be used in new builds, the energy
renovation of existing buildings and the restoration of historical buildings. Itβs formed by mixing industrial
hemp shives with a composite lime based binder and water and is primarily used for the construction walls
by casting around a timber stud frame. Using life cycle assessment methodology the study aims to define
the life cycle environmental impacts of hemp-lime concrete in the context of Serbia. Through a series of
sensitivity analyses that examine the environmental imapacts of varying key parameters like the hemp shiv
carbon dioxide sequestration factor, binder carbonation factor, industrial hemp yield, material transport
distance and building site waste formation rate, three primary scenarios demonstrating the wide range of
environmental impacts ofassociated with the life cycle of hemp-lime concrete wall are developed. The
environmental impacts of variable hemp shiv degradation factors at end of life, prefabricating hemp-lime
concrete into blocks and various wall finishes were also examined. Through comparisons with the life cycle
of typical residential construction practices in Serbia, it is observed that hemp-lime concrete can be
considered an environmentally sustainable building material and that it is superior in virtually all of the
examined environmental impact categories
Life cycle assessment of hemp-lime concrete wall constructions: The impact of wall finish type and renewal regimes
Using sustainable building materials is one of the key methods for minimising the negative environmental impacts of the global construction industry. Bio-based buildings building materials, such as hemp-lime concrete, are considered more sustainable, as they make use of a renewable raw material and can sequester CO2 from the atmosphere. Studies have shown that hemp-lime concrete can have a favourable global warming potential, though the life cycle of building materials affects a wide variety of negative environmental phenomena that should also be considered. Studies examining the life cycle of hemp-lime concrete have so far primarily focused on the material itself. Though the exterior surface of a hemp-lime concrete wall needs to be protected and have a finish applied to it, few studies have considered the environmental impacts of coated hemp-lime concrete wall constructions. Using life cycle assessment methodology, through a wide range of environmental impact categories, the study analysed the environmental impacts of applying lime putty and sand coatings to a hemp-lime concrete wall in pessimistic, average and optimistic scenarios, It also compared the environmental impacts of four types of appropriate wall finishes and the impacts of applying varying finish renewal regimes in the use phase. It was found that applying lime putty and sand finishes to the exterior and interior surface of a hemp lime concrete wall increased the total global warming potential by 19.054β30.793 kgCO2eq and had a noticeable effect on all other impact categories. It was found that while no one finish type could be considered globally superior to the others, in a majority of circumstances applying lime-based coatings resulted in lower embodied environmental impacts, than applying a ventilated faΓ§ade with timber cladding
Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of hemp-lime concrete wall constructions in Serbia: The impact of carbon sequestration, transport, waste production and end of life biogenic carbon emission
The construction industry contributes to climate change through significant greenhouse gas emissions. Utilising sustainable building materials with low embodied environmental impacts and low greenhouse gas emissions is key to future sustainable development. Bio-based materials, such as hemp-lime concrete, possess environmental advantages as they make use of a renewable raw material and can sequester CO2 from the atmosphere. Through the use of life cycle assessment methodology the study analyses the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the life cycle of a hemp-lime concrete wall and examines the effects of variations that can arise during the life cycle of the material. Sensitivity analyses were used to examine the effects of varying the hemp shiv sequestration factor, binder carbonation factor, gate to site transport distances and raw material construction waste on greenhouse gas emissions, culminating in the creation of three primary emission scenarios (average, pessimistic and optimistic). It was found that the examined variables can have a large impact on greenhouse gas emissions and the environmental perception of the material, as the optimistic life cycle scenario had a negative global warming potential (β9.696kgCO2eq.), while the pessimistic scenario had a positive global warming potential (10.165kgCO2eq.). Additionally alternative end of life scenarios were developed to examine the effects of varying hemp shiv degradability at the end of life stage, demonstrating the potentially large impacts a high factor of degradable organic carbon can have on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions