Surgical management of acutely ruptured hepatoblastoma with definitive oncologic resection

Hepatoblastoma is the most common liver tumor in childhood. In a minority of cases, hepatoblastomas can present with tumor rupture and hemorrhage, particularly in the setting of rapid tumor growth or rapid necrosis after the initiation of chemotherapy. While surgical resection is the mainstay of definitive care in treatment of nonruptured lesions, rupture presents unique challenges in terms of emergent interventions as well as definitive oncologic care. Management of a patient with a symptomatic ruptured hepatoblastoma involves either i) emergent control of hemorrhage with embolization (or operative control of bleeding) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and definitive resection at a later date, or ii) emergent oncologic resection at presentation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. We report the case of a 19 month old child with recently diagnosed hepatoblastoma who presented with tumor rupture and hemorrhage shortly after the initiation of chemotherapy. She underwent emergency definitive oncologic resection and recovered well to resume and complete chemotherapy

Can Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI be Used to Differentiate Hepatic Hemangioma from Other Lesions in Early Infancy?

Background Confident diagnosis of hepatic hemangioma on imaging can avoid biopsy in early infancy and helps guide conservative management

Temporal evolution of living donor liver transplantation survival - A UNOS registry study.

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a curative treatment for various liver diseases, reducing waitlist times and associated mortality. We aimed to assess the overall survival (OS), identify predictors for mortality, and analyze differences in risk factors over time. Adult patients undergoing LDLT were selected from the United Network for Organ Sharing database from inception (1987) to 2023. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis, and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were conducted. 7,257 LDLT recipients with a median age of 54years (IQR:45,61), 54% male, 80% non-Hispanic White, BMI 26.3kg/m2 (IQR:23.2,30.0), and MELD 15 (IQR:11,19) were included. The median cold ischemic time was 1.6hours (IQR:1.0,2.3) with 88% right-lobe-grafts. The follow-up was 4.0years (IQR:1.0,9.2). The contemporary reached median overall survival was 17.0years (95%CI:16.1,18.1) with OS estimates: 1-year 95%, 3-years 89%, 5-years OS 84%, 10-years 72%, 15-years 56% and 20-years 43%. Nine independent factors associated with mortality were identified, with an independent improved OS in the recent time era (aHR 0.53; 95%CI:0.39,0.71). The median center-caseload per year was 5 (IQR:2,10) with observed center-specific improvement of OS. LDLT is a safe procedure with excellent OS. Its efficacy has improved despite an increase of risk parameters, suggesting its limits are yet to be met

Living Donor Availability Improves Patient Survival in a North American Center: An Intention-to-treat Analysis.

OBJECTIVE Assess the impact of having a living donor on waitlist outcomes and overall survival through an intention-to-treat analysis. BACKGROUND Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) offers an alternative to deceased donation in the face of organ shortage. An as-treated analysis revealed that undergoing LDLT, compared to staying on the waiting list, is associated with improved survival, even at Model for End-stage Liver Disease-sodium (MELD-Na) score of 11. METHODS Liver transplant candidates listed at the Ajmera Transplant Centre (2000-2021) were categorized as pLDLT (having a potential living donor) or pDDLT (without a living donor). Employing Cox proportional-hazard regression with time-dependent covariates, we evaluated pLDLT's impact on waitlist dropout and overall survival through a risk-adjusted analysis. RESULTS Of 4,124 candidates, 984 (24%) had potential living donors. The pLDLT group experienced significantly lower overall waitlist dropouts (5.2%vs. 34.4%, P<0.001) and mortality (3.8%vs. 24.4%, P<0.001) compared to the pDDLT group. Possessing a living donor correlated with a 26% decline in the risk of waitlist dropout (adjusted hazard ratio 0.74, 95%CI 0.55-0.99, P=0.042). The pLDLT group also demonstrated superior survival outcomes at 1- (84.9%vs. 80.1%), 5- (77.6%vs. 61.7%), and 10-year (65.6%vs.52.9%) from listing (log-rank P<0.001) with a 35% reduced risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio 0.65, 95%CI 0.56-0.76, P<0.001). Moreover, the predicted hazard ratios consistently remained below 1 across the MELD-Na range 11-26. CONCLUSIONS Having a potential living donor significantly improves survival in end-stage liver disease patients, even with MELD-Na scores as low as 11. This emphasizes the need to promote awareness and adoption of LDLT in liver transplant programs worldwide

Outcomes after liver transplantation using deceased after circulatory death donors: A comparison of outcomes in the UK and the US.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Identifying international differences in utilization and outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) after donation after circulatory death (DCD) donation provides a unique opportunity for benchmarking and population-level insight. METHODS: Adult (≥18 years) LT data between 2008 and 2018 from the UK and US were used to assess mortality and graft failure after DCD LT. We used time-dependent Cox-regression methods to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for risk-adjusted short-term (0-90 days) and longer-term (90 days-5 years) outcomes. RESULTS: One-thousand five-hundred-and-sixty LT receipts from the UK and 3426 from the US were included. Over the study period, the use of DCD livers increased from 15.7% to 23.9% in the UK compared to 5.1% to 7.6% in the US. In the UK, DCD donors were older (UK:51 vs. US:33 years) with longer cold ischaemia time (UK: 437 vs. US: 333 min). Recipients in the US had higher Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores, higher body mass index, higher proportions of ascites, encephalopathy, diabetes and previous abdominal surgeries. No difference in the risk-adjusted short-term mortality or graft failure was observed between the countries. In the longer-term (90 days-5 years), the UK had lower mortality and graft failure (adj.mortality HR:UK: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.49-0.80); graft failure HR: UK: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58-0.91). The cumulative incidence of retransplantation was higher in the UK (5 years: UK: 11.9% vs. 4.6%; p \u3c .001). CONCLUSIONS: For those receiving a DCD LT, longer-term post-transplant outcomes in the UK are superior to the US, however, significant differences in recipient illness, graft quality and access to retransplantation were seen between the two countries