20 research outputs found

    Analyzing brain activity in understanding cultural and language interaction for depression and anxiety

    Get PDF
    Human brain has always been considered as a black box and is the source of all emotions. Analyzing cultural and language role through human emotion by looking at the brain activity can thus help us understand depression and stress better. This paper focuses on understanding and analyzing undergraduate students’ emotions with different background and culture after completing their semester final examination. Brain wave signals were captured using EEG device and analyzed through proposing an affective computation model. EEG signal was collected from 8 healthy subjects from different states of Malaysia with different dialects where each subject was emotionally induced with audio and video emotion stimuli using the International Affective Pictures and System (IAPS). Features were extracted from the captured EEG signals using Kernel Density Estimation (KDE), which was then categorized into four basic emotions of happy, calm, sad and fear using the Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP). Results of the study show potential of using such analysis in understanding stress, anxiety and depression

    Exposure to diesel exhaust induces changes in EEG in human volunteers

    Get PDF
    Background: Ambient particulate matter and nanoparticles have been shown to translocate to the brain, and potentially influence the central nervous system. No data are available whether this may lead to functional changes in the brain. Methods: We exposed 10 human volunteers to dilute diesel exhaust (DE, 300 μg/m3) as a model for ambient PM exposure and filtered air for one hour using a double blind randomized crossover design. Brain activity was monitored during and for one hour following each exposure using quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) at 8 different sites on the scalp. The frequency spectrum of the EEG signals was used to calculate the median power frequency (MPF) and specific frequency bands of the QEEG. Results: Our data demonstrate a significant increase in MPF in response to DE in the frontal cortex within 30 min into exposure. The increase in MPF is primarily caused by an increase in fast wave activity (β2) and continues to rise during the 1 hour post-exposure interval. Conclusion: This study is the first to show a functional effect of DE exposure in the human brain, indicating a general cortical stress response. Further studies are required to determine whether this effect is mediated by the nanoparticles in DE and to define the precise pathways involved

    Cross-brain networks for the two music improvisation experiments.

    No full text
    <p>The left graph is for the first experiment, while the right graph is for the second experiment. The red links represent the direction of cross-brain information flow, while the thickness of the links is proportional to the strength of the cross-brain weights (i.e. the average cross-brain causalities).</p

    Degree centrality contrasts, or difference, between composed music and improvisation in the second experiment.

    No full text
    <p>In this figure, the red stems and the blue stems indicate the in and out degree centrality contrasts between composed music and improvisation, respectively. The horizontal axis has 9 channels represent the 8 electrodes: P4, T8, C4, F4, F3, C3, T7, P3 and the overall average over the 8 electrodes, while the vertical axis gives the magnitudes of the degree centrality contrasts between composed music and improvisation.</p

    Degree centrality contrasts between strict mode and “let-go” mode in the second experiment.

    No full text
    <p>In this figure, the red stems and the blue stems indicate the in and out degree centrality contrasts between strict mode and “let-go” mode, respectively. The horizontal axis has 9 channels represent the 8 electrodes: P4, T8, C4, F4, F3, C3, T7, P3 and the overall average over the 8 electrodes, while the vertical axis gives the magnitudes of the degree centrality contrasts between strict mode and “let-go” mode.</p

    The cross-brain weights between flutist and listener in the second experiment.

    No full text
    <p>This figure plots the cross-brain causalities between flutist and listener against time windows for piece A: Ibert, strict mode. The red curve indicates flutistlistener, the blue curve represents listenerflutist, while the black curve is the significance threshold.</p

    Listener's intra-brain neural networks for the first experiment.

    No full text
    <p>The two panels show the listener's intra-brain neural networks separately for composed music (left) and improvisation (right). The large brain regions are labeled by the 8 electrodes: F3, F4, C3, C4, T7, T8, P3, P4. The red links indicate the direction of neural information flow between large brain regions, where the thickness of the links represents the magnitudes of the causalities.</p

    Color-map of cross-brain causality matrix between flutist and harpist in the second experiment.

    No full text
    <p>This graph shows a color-map (scaled between 0 and 1) of the cross-brain causality matrix for the flutist and harpist at the time window 15 (140.01s-150.00s) during the performance of piece A: Ibert (strict mode). The two diagonal blocks indicate the intra-brain causalities for the flutist (upper-left) and the harpist (lower-right), respectively, while the two off-diagonal blocks indicate the cross-brain causalities for flutistharpist (upper-right) and for harpistflutist (lower-left). The correspondence between the color and the causality values is shown in the color-bar.</p

    Color-map of the contrast causality matrix between composed music and improvisation.

    No full text
    <p>In this figure, the two lattice plot indicates the contrast causality matrices between composed music and improvisation separately for musicians (left) and listeners (right). The direction of information flow is from the row channel to the column channel for each lattice. The color of the lattice indicates the strength of the causality contrasts, of difference, between composed music and improvisation, which is scaled between and . The correspondence between the color and the causality strength is shown in the color-bar.</p
    corecore