Cytokine dynamics and targeted immunotherapies in autoimmune encephalitis

Autoimmune encephalitides constitute a diverse group of immune-mediated central nervous system disorders mainly characterized by the presence of antibodies targeting neuronal or glial antigens. Despite the notable contribution of antibody discovery to the understanding of their physiopathology, the specific immune cells and inflammatory mediators involved in autoimmune encephalitis are still poorly defined. However, cytokines have recently emerged as crucial signalling molecules in the pathogenesis of autoimmune encephalitis. Cytokines are biologically active, soluble, low-molecular-weight proteins or glycoproteins involved in a wide variety of physiological functions, including central nervous system development and homeostasis, immune surveillance, as well as proliferation and maturation of immune cells. Since unbalanced cytokine expression is considered a hallmark of many autoimmune central nervous system disorders, their identification and quantification has become an essential element in personalized medicine applied to the field of neuroimmunology. Several studies have explored the cytokine profile of autoimmune encephalitis, but their interpretation and comparison is challenging due to their small sample sizes and extremely high heterogeneity, especially regarding the cytokines analysed, type of sample used, and associated neural antibody. Only the cytokine profile of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis has extensively been investigated, with findings suggesting that, although humoral immunity is the main effector, T cells may also be relevant for the development of this disorder. A better understanding of cytokine dynamics governing neuroinflammation might offer the opportunity of developing new therapeutic strategies against specific immune cells, cytokines, antibodies, or intracellular signalling cascades, therefore leading to better outcomes and preventing undesired side effects of the presently used strategies. In this review, we first summarize the current knowledge about the role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of autoimmune encephalitis, combining theoretical analysis with experimental validations, to assess their suitability as clinical biomarkers. Second, we discuss the potential applicability of the novel targeted immunotherapies in autoimmune encephalitis depending on the immunobiology of the associated antibody, their limitations, as well as the main limitations that should be addressed in future studies

Recurrent glioblastoma: From molecular landscape to new treatment perspectives

Glioblastoma is the most frequent and aggressive form among malignant central nervous system primary tumors in adults. Standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma consists in maximal safe resection, if feasible, followed by radiochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide; despite this multimodal treatment, virtually all glioblastomas relapse. Once tumors progress after first-line therapy, treatment options are limited and management of recurrent glioblastoma remains challenging. Loco-regional therapy with re-surgery or re-irradiation may be evaluated in selected cases, while traditional systemic therapy with nitrosoureas and temozolomide rechallenge showed limited efficacy. In recent years, new clinical trials using, for example, regorafenib or a combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy were performed with promising results. In particular, molecular targeted therapy could show efficacy in selected patients with specific gene mutations. Nonetheless, some molecular characteristics and genetic alterations could change during tumor progression, thus affecting the efficacy of precision medicine. We therefore reviewed the molecular and genomic landscape of recurrent glioblastoma, the strategy for clinical management and the major phase I-III clinical trials analyzing recent drugs and combination regimens in these patients

Les méningiomes : mise au point sur les connaissances actuelles

International audienceMeningiomas are the most frequent among intracranial tumors, and represent more than 30% of primitive central nervous system neoplasms. Arising from the meninges, they are generally benign lesions and can be treated by either radio-clinical follow-up or surgical resection with excellent outcome. However, more than 20% of meningiomas harbor atypical or malignant features and represent challenges for both prognostic evaluation and therapeutic strategy. The discovery of the genetic and epigenetic landscapes of meningiomas enabled the identification of new prognostic markers and potential therapeutic targets for refractory meningiomas. This review summarizes current epidemiology, histological and molecular characteristics, diagnosis and treatments for meningiomas, and highlights the close relationship between the development of meningiomas and hormonal intake, as illustrated by recent recommendations of the "Agence Nationale de Securité du Medicament", the French national drug safety agency.Les méningiomes sont les tumeurs intracrâniennes les plus fréquentes, représentant plus d’un tiers des tumeurs primitives du système nerveux central. Développés au dépens des méninges, ils sont généralement histologiquement bénins et bénéficient d’un suivi radioclinique par IRM ou d’un traitement par exérèse chirurgicale avec de bons résultats. Cependant, 20 % d’entre eux se présentent sous la forme de tumeurs plus agressives représentant un défi à la fois pour l’évaluation du pronostic et pour le choix des traitements. Les avancées dans la caractérisation moléculaire et génétique des méningiomes ont permis d’appréhender de nouveaux facteurs pronostiques et de découvrir de potentielles cibles pour des traitements ciblés dans les formes réfractaires à la chirurgie et à la radiothérapie. Cette mise au point synthétise les connaissances épidémiologiques, moléculaires et histologiques, et les modalités de diagnostic et de traitement des méningiomes, ainsi que le lien entre les progestatifs et les méningiomes à la lumière des recommandations récentes de l’Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament

Advances in treatments of patients with classical and emergent neurological toxicities of anticancer agents

International audienc

Prognosis of glioblastoma patients improves significantly over time interrogating historical controls

International audienceBackground: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common devastating primary brain cancer in adults. In our clinical practice, median overall survival (mOS) of GBM patients seems increasing over time.Methods: To address this observation, we have retrospectively analyzed the prognosis of 722 newly diagnosed GBM patients, aged below 70, in good clinical conditions (i.e. Karnofsky Performance Status -KPS- above 70%) and treated in our department according to the standard of care (SOC) between 2005 and 2018. Patients were divided into two groups according to the year of diagnosis (group 1: from 2005 to 2012; group 2: from 2013 to 2018).Results: Characteristics of patients and tumors of both groups were very similar regarding confounding factors (age, KPS, MGMT promoter methylation status and treatments). Follow-up time was fixed at 24 months to ensure comparable survival times between both groups. Group 1 patients had a mOS of 19 months ([17.3-21.3]) while mOS of group 2 patients was not reached. The recent period of diagnosis was significantly associated with a longer mOS in univariate analysis (HR=0.64, 95% CI [0.51 - 0.81]), p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that the period of diagnosis remained significantly prognostic after adjustment on confounding factors (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 0.49, 95% CI [0.36-0.67], p < 0.001).Conclusion: This increase of mOS over time in newly diagnosed GBM patients could be explained by better management of potentially associated non-neurological diseases, optimization of validated SOC, better management of treatments side effects, supportive care and participation in clinical trials