Partial Nephrectomy A Comparison between Different Modalities

Kidney cancer, with 4% of all malignancies, is one of the most common malignancies occurring among in adults. In Saudi Arabia, kidney cancer comprises 2.3% of all cancers, and its incidence has increased by 33%. Partial nephrectomy (PN) is considered as the gold standard for T1 renal masses. In this retrospective study, we did a chart review for all patients who underwent PNs between April 2013 and February 2019. Data comprised pre-sentation, tumor size, type of procedure (open vs. laparoscopic vs. robotic), and intra- and post-operative complications. Chi-square, ANOVA, and cross-tabulation were done using SPSS software. P > 0.05 was considered significant. Approval was obtained from the institutional review board of King Abdullah International Medical Research Center. In all, 69 patients were identified: 26 (37.7%) males and 43 (62.3%) females, with mean age = 54.53 ± 13.21 years; mean body mass index = 32.36 ± 7.03, and mean tumor size = 3.7 ± 1.72 cm. In terms of presentation, most patients (50, 72.4%) presented incidentally as opposed to symptomatic presentation. Of these patients, 18 (26.1%) underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN), 29 (42%) laparoscopic partial nephrec-tomy (LPN), and 22 (31.9%) robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). On comparing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) PN with OPN, we found that OPN had more blood loss and a longer hospital stay but a shorter operating room (OR) time. Results of PN irrespective of the procedure type, whether it was OPN, LPN, or RPN, were similar if performed by experienced surgeons. However, open procedures involved a higher blood loss, more operative time, and longer hospital stay when compared with minimally invasive techniques

Simultaneous and synchronous bilateral endoscopic treatment of urolithiasis : a multicentric study

The general prevalence of bilateral urolithiasis has risen to 15% and bilateral non-simultaneous treatment has been reported to have good outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of simultaneous bilateral endoscopic surgery (SBES). An international multicenter analysis was performed between May 2015 and December 2017. All patients with bilateral stone disease that underwent SBES were included. Patients were treated under general anesthesia in either the supine or lithotomy position. Demographic, clinical, intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed. A total of 47 patients were included. Mean age was 53.8 years and 70% of the patients were males. The mean American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score was 2. The mean diameter of right- and left-sided stones was 29.43 mm (2-83 mm) and 31.15 (4-102 mm), respectively. Staghorn stones were treated in 18 cases (8 right-sided and 10 left-sided), four of them were defined as complete staghorn. The procedures performed were 42 cases of bilateral URS and PCNL and ureteroscopy. Additionally, 5 bilateral flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) cases were described. Intraoperative complications occurred in five patients: four of them were classified as Clavien-Dindo (CD) I and one as CD II. Postoperatively, there were two cases with CD I, 6 with CD II and one CD IIIa. The stone-free status was 70%. Residual stones (30%) were detected only on the side treated for high-volume (complete) staghorn calculi. SBES is a feasible, effective and safe procedure. It may potentially avoid repeated anesthetic sessions as needed for staged procedures and reduce the length of patients' hospital stay

[26] Failure of ureteric access sheath insertion in virgin ureters: a prospective cohort study

Objective: To identify the failure rate of insertion of a ureteric access sheath (UAS) during primary flexible ureteroscopy (FURS), in order to improve preoperative patient’s counselling as well as identify patients who might benefit from pre-stenting FURS. Methods: This is a single-surgeon single tertiary care centre prospective cohort study. All patients who underwent primary FURS for proximal ureteric or renal stones from November 2014 to May 2018 were included in the study. We used one type of UAS 10/12-F coaxial UAS from Rocamed. Data collected included: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), previous spontaneous passage of stones, and congenital anomalies. Descriptive analysis was done. Results: The study included 128 patients and they all underwent primary FURS. In all, 73.4% (94 patients) were males, 26.6% (34) were females. The failure rate of primary UAS insertion was 11.7% (15 patients), the mean age of the failure group was 43.2 years and 14/15 were males. Six were obese with BMI of >30 kg/m2 and six had a previous episode of spontaneous stone passage. None of the failed patients had anatomical abnormalities. In all, 113 patients (88.3%) had a successful primary FURS and insertion of a UAS. The mean age was 46.3 years and 27.4% (31 patients) were females. In all, 50.4% (57 patients) of the success group had previous episodes of spontaneous stone passage. Conclusion: A very low failure rate was obtained in unstented patients. Female patients and patients with an episode of spontaneous stone passage were more likely to be accessed primarily. Our study helps the urologist to make an informed consent and facilitate the decision of pre-stenting in selected patients

Distal sciatic neuropraxia secondary to lithotomy position: A case report and literature review

Urolithiasis is one of the commonest urological diseases that can greatly impact the health status of patients with a high socioeconomic burden. Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) has been considered to be the surgery of choice for small renal stones (Less than 2 cm) due to its feasibility and safety. However, even with potentially low risk, complications can still result with RIRS. In this article we present a unique case of a 12-year-old male who had complete foot drop as a complication following RIRS. No similar case has been reported in the literature

Effects of first year COVID-19 pandemic on urology practice in three major Arab Countries: Sub-Analysis of a survey by Arab association of urology research group.

Background and objectivesThe World Health Organization (WHO) declared the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic on March 11, 2020. The health care system faced tremendous challenges in providing ethical and high-quality care. The impact of COVID-19 on urological practices varied widely worldwide, including in Arab countries. This study aimed to compare the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on urology practice in Egypt, the KSA, and the UAE during the first year of the pandemic.MethodsThis sub-analysis assessed the demographics and COVID-19's effects on urological practice in terms of adjustments to hospital policy, including outpatient consultations, the management of elective and urgent surgical cases, and the continuation of education across the three countries. The availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) and urologists' emotional, physical, and verbal intimidation during COVID-19 were also compared.ResultsRegarding the impact on hospital policy, consultations replaced by telemedicine were significantly higher in the KSA (36.15%), followed by the UAE (33.3%), then Egypt (10.4%) (P = 0.008). Elective cases requiring ICU admission were 65.1% in Egypt, 45.2% in the KSA, and 58.2% in the UAE and were performed only in high-risk patients. PPE was freely available in 20.8% of the Egyptian hospitals compared to 83.3% in the KSA and 81.8% in the UAE. Online courses were significantly higher in Egypt (70.8%), followed by the UAE (53%) and the KSA (41.7%) (P = 0.02). Emotional intimidation was higher than verbal intimidation, representing 80%, 75.9%, and 76% in the UAE, KSA, and Egypt, respectively.ConclusionThis sub-analysis outlined significant hospital policy changes across the three Arab countries. Exposure to emotional, verbal, and physical intimidation was observed. The development of teleconsultations and online platforms for educational purposes was observed

Table1_A novel nomogram and prognostic factor for metastatic renal cell carcinoma survival in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).docx

Patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) for whom surgery is ineffective may experience a poor prognosis. The different sites where cancer has spread, and the different ways to treat it in the immune checkpoint inhibitors era could help clinical decision-making. In this study, individuals with mRCC were selected from the SEER database between 2015 and 2016 based on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of ICIs. A total of 4011 mRCC patients were studied (2239 with lung metastasis vs. 797 with liver metastasis in the immune checkpoint inhibitors period). The age ≤ 64 years and male were the majority in all cases of mRCC. When the two groups (lung metastasis and liver metastasis) were compared, the liver metastasis group had more bone metastasis than the lung metastasis group (41.8% vs. 34.1%, p < 0.001), but the lung metastasis group had more brain metastasis (8.9% vs. 11.5%) (p = 0.023). In a study of overall survival (OS) in the ICI era for mRCC, we found that lung metastasis was significantly associated with improved survival compared to liver metastasis (p < 0.001: 7 months vs. 4 months). This survival advantage restricted in lung metastasis group of mRCC after adjusting age, sex, race, marital status, histological type, metastasis to bone, and brain, origin, radiotherapy record chemotherapy record, surgery on multivariable using Cox proportional hazard model (HR = 1.407; 95% CI = 1. 269−1.560; p < 0.001). The overall survival difference between the variables of the lung metastasis and liver metastasis was noted among most of the variables, with survival benefits restricted to patients in lung metastasis in the ICI era. Patients who had undergone chemotherapy and surgery were strongly positive predictors for better OS (HR = 0.427; 95% CI = 0.379−0.481; p < 0.001) (HR = 0.371; 95% CI = 0.311−0.444; p=< 0.001), and (HR = 0.313; 95% CI = 0.264−0.372; p < 0.001), (HR = 0.427; 95% CI = 0.320−0.568; p < 0.001) in lung metastasis group and liver metastasis group. The c-index of the prognostic nomogram for OS prediction was 0.74 and 0.73. This study found that patients with lung metastasis who received ICI had better survival than those with liver metastasis. Chemotherapy and surgery enhanced survival in kidney cancer patients, whereas radiation had little impact. We developed a complete and realistic nomogram for mRCC patients based on distant metastases to the lung and liver.</p

Effects on the hospital policy.

Background and objectivesThe World Health Organization (WHO) declared the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic on March 11, 2020. The health care system faced tremendous challenges in providing ethical and high-quality care. The impact of COVID-19 on urological practices varied widely worldwide, including in Arab countries. This study aimed to compare the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on urology practice in Egypt, the KSA, and the UAE during the first year of the pandemic.MethodsThis sub-analysis assessed the demographics and COVID-19’s effects on urological practice in terms of adjustments to hospital policy, including outpatient consultations, the management of elective and urgent surgical cases, and the continuation of education across the three countries. The availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) and urologists’ emotional, physical, and verbal intimidation during COVID-19 were also compared.ResultsRegarding the impact on hospital policy, consultations replaced by telemedicine were significantly higher in the KSA (36.15%), followed by the UAE (33.3%), then Egypt (10.4%) (P = 0.008). Elective cases requiring ICU admission were 65.1% in Egypt, 45.2% in the KSA, and 58.2% in the UAE and were performed only in high-risk patients. PPE was freely available in 20.8% of the Egyptian hospitals compared to 83.3% in the KSA and 81.8% in the UAE. Online courses were significantly higher in Egypt (70.8%), followed by the UAE (53%) and the KSA (41.7%) (P = 0.02). Emotional intimidation was higher than verbal intimidation, representing 80%, 75.9%, and 76% in the UAE, KSA, and Egypt, respectively.ConclusionThis sub-analysis outlined significant hospital policy changes across the three Arab countries. Exposure to emotional, verbal, and physical intimidation was observed. The development of teleconsultations and online platforms for educational purposes was observed.</div

Intimidations to urologists during the first year of COVID-19 in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the Emirates.

Intimidations to urologists during the first year of COVID-19 in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the Emirates.</p

Effects on the urologists.

Background and objectivesThe World Health Organization (WHO) declared the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic on March 11, 2020. The health care system faced tremendous challenges in providing ethical and high-quality care. The impact of COVID-19 on urological practices varied widely worldwide, including in Arab countries. This study aimed to compare the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on urology practice in Egypt, the KSA, and the UAE during the first year of the pandemic.MethodsThis sub-analysis assessed the demographics and COVID-19’s effects on urological practice in terms of adjustments to hospital policy, including outpatient consultations, the management of elective and urgent surgical cases, and the continuation of education across the three countries. The availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) and urologists’ emotional, physical, and verbal intimidation during COVID-19 were also compared.ResultsRegarding the impact on hospital policy, consultations replaced by telemedicine were significantly higher in the KSA (36.15%), followed by the UAE (33.3%), then Egypt (10.4%) (P = 0.008). Elective cases requiring ICU admission were 65.1% in Egypt, 45.2% in the KSA, and 58.2% in the UAE and were performed only in high-risk patients. PPE was freely available in 20.8% of the Egyptian hospitals compared to 83.3% in the KSA and 81.8% in the UAE. Online courses were significantly higher in Egypt (70.8%), followed by the UAE (53%) and the KSA (41.7%) (P = 0.02). Emotional intimidation was higher than verbal intimidation, representing 80%, 75.9%, and 76% in the UAE, KSA, and Egypt, respectively.ConclusionThis sub-analysis outlined significant hospital policy changes across the three Arab countries. Exposure to emotional, verbal, and physical intimidation was observed. The development of teleconsultations and online platforms for educational purposes was observed.</div