Osteosarcoma of the Jaw: Classification, Diagnosis and Treatment

Osteosarcomas are rare, highly malignant, bone tumors defined by the presence of malignant mesenchymal cells producing osteoid or immature bone. Osteosarcomas of the jaws are extremely rare, representing about 7% of all osteosarcomas and 1% of all head and neck malignancies. An accurate diagnosis, usually facilitated by chemotherapy (CT), MRI and biopsy, is required in order to define the stage of the disease and plane the adequate treatment. Aggressive surgical resection and advanced technique reconstruction are the mainstay of treatment, as the single most important factor for cure is radical resection. Clinical outcomes can be improved by a multimodal strategy combining surgery with neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in selected cases, and adjuvant radiotherapy in the absence of clear margins

Have There Been any Changes in the Epidemiology and Etiology of Maxillofacial Trauma During the COVID-19 Pandemic? An Italian Multicenter Study

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has had a significant impact on people's behavior. The aim of this study has been to evaluate how the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has impacted the incidence and the features of maxillofacial fractures presented at 6 Italian tertiary centers. Clinical records of all the patients diagnosed for facial fractures between February 23 and May 23, 2019 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Any differences in patient number and characteristics and fracture etiology and site between the 2 groups were then statistically analyzed.There has been a 69.1% decrease in the number of incoming patients during the pandemic. The number of foreign patients has decreased significantly (23.3% versus 9.6%, P\u200a=\u200a0.011) while the average age has increased (38.6 versus 45.6 years old, P\u200a=\u200a0.01). Specific statistical significant differences for accidental falls (31.8% versus 50.1%, P\u200a=\u200a0.005) and sports injuries (16.9% versus 1.4%, P\u200a<\u200a0.001) were found. Concerning fracture sites, significant differences have been found in relation to nasal (22.5% versus 11.4%, P\u200a=\u200a0.009) and frontal sinus (0.9% versus 4.4%, P\u200a=\u200a0.037) fractures. In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has significantly changed the epidemiology and the etiology of facial traumas

Objective Assessment of Lingual Nerve Microsurgical Reconstruction

Lingual nerve (LN) injury is one of the most serious consequences of oral surgery. Prompt microsurgical reconstruction of the nerve can alleviate most of those symptoms leading to satisfactory functional recovery. Thirty-five patients with partial to complete LN injury underwent surgery in the period between January 2006 and May 2015. All patients underwent a preoperative clinical and neurological evaluation with the assessment of lingual tactile and pain sensory thresholds and masseteric inhibitory reflex. All patients underwent explorative surgery and direct microneurorrhaphy of distal and proximal stumps in case of complete lesion, while the removal of traumatic neuroma and the following microneurorrhaphy of distal and proximal stumps of the injured nerve was performed in case of incomplete lesion. Nerve grafting has always been avoided because of distal stump mobilization obtained by severing the submandibular branch of the LN. All patients but 1 exhibited good recovery of tongue sensation, never complete, both clinically and electrophysiologically: recovery of the excitability of masseteric inhibitory reflex suppression components SP1 and SP2 was observed, often with increased latencies but consistent with a functional recovery. All patients feeling pain preoperatively experienced complete relief of algic symptoms. The early microsurgical approach is the most suitable choice for the treatment of LN injuries. Lingual nerve injuries (LNI) are a potential clinical consequence in oral and maxillofacial surgery, leading to significant functional impairments (anaesthesia, hypoesthesia, dysesthesia, hyperesthesia, pain).1\u20135 Burning dysesthesia accompanies anaesthesia in almost 40% of patients. In 8% to 15% of patients, pain remains the most debilitating sequela, requiring adequate treatment.6,7 Patients experience the LNI-related functional impairment as a real psychological and physical discomfort.8 Knowledge gaps in the management of LNI patients lead to dissatisfaction with the service received and worsen the acceptance of neural deficits. Our work aims to objectively assess lingual nerve (LN) deficits and results of related microsurgery. Based on those data, we propose a guideline for LNI management, emphasizing the importance of timely diagnosis and surgical intervention. Follow-up should concentrate on preventing chronic sensory deficits to maintain patients\u2019 quality of life.

Submental Orotracheal Intubation: An Alternative to Tracheotomy in Transfacial Cranial Base Surgery

This retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of submental intubation not only for trauma treatment but also for oncological cranial base surgery. The medical records of 24 patients who underwent submental intubation from 1996 to 2002 were reviewed. There were 6 procedures for craniofacial trauma, 12 transmaxillary approaches to the clivus for clivus chordomas, and 6 transmaxillary approaches to the cranial base for chondrosarcomas. Time required for intubation, accidental extubation, postoperative complications, and the healing of intraoral and submental scars were evaluated. The submental orotracheal intubation was completed successfully in all patients. No accidental extubations or tube injuries occurred. The mean time required for intubation was 5 minutes. The only complication was one case of superficial infection of the submental wound. The intraoral and submental accesses healed with minimal scarring in all patients. Submental orotracheal intubation is a useful and safe technique for airway management of craniomaxillofacial traumas and during transfacial approaches to the cranial base. It avoids the complications associated with tracheostomy. It also permits considerable downward retraction of the maxilla after a Le Fort I osteotomy and is associated with good clival exposure. Furthermore, it does not interfere with maxillomandibular fixation at the end of the surgery

Corneal Neurotization: A Game-Changing Surgical Procedure for Neurotrophic Keratopathy

Purpose: The aim of this study is to describe techniques, results, and open issues of corneal neurotization (CN) for the treatment of neurotrophic keratopathy (NK). Methods: An overview of the most important studies of CN is provided. The 2 main surgical approaches (namely, direct CN and indirect CN) with specific advantages and disadvantages are described. The results regarding changes of corneal sensitivity and clarity, visual acuity, and in vivo confocal microscopy metrics are summarized. Ex vivo studies with histopathology of the neurotized cornea are reported. Intraoperative and early and late postoperative complications are described along with current open issues to be further clarified. Results: Corneal sensitivity improves after both direct and indirect CN. Corneal reinnervation allows the healing of NK in almost the totality of the operated eyes, determining a corresponding improvement of corneal clarity and visual acuity. Regeneration of corneal nerve fibers is confirmed by means of either in vivo confocal microscopy or ex vivo histopathology. Few self-limiting complications are reported during the postoperative course. Current open issues concern the identification of the technique of choice, the use of autograft or allograft, and the timing of CN either when performed alone or when combined with other surgeries. Conclusions: CN represents a game-changing surgical procedure for NK, which has the potential to restore corneal sensitivity in all stages of the disease regardless of the mechanism of denervation. Further long-term results are needed to confirm its efficacy over time. The design of randomized clinical trials comparing CN with noninterventional therapies could further validate the adoption of this technique

Corneal Neurotization

Purpose: The aim of this study is to describe techniques, results, and open issues of corneal neurotization (CN) for the treatment of neurotrophic keratopathy (NK). Methods: An overview of the most important studies of CN is provided. The 2 main surgical approaches (namely, direct CN and indirect CN) with specific advantages and disadvantages are described. The results regarding changes of corneal sensitivity and clarity, visual acuity, and in vivo confocal microscopy metrics are summarized. Ex vivo studies with histopathology of the neurotized cornea are reported. Intraoperative and early and late postoperative complications are described along with current open issues to be further clarified. Results: Corneal sensitivity improves after both direct and indirect CN. Corneal reinnervation allows the healing of NK in almost the totality of the operated eyes, determining a corresponding improvement of corneal clarity and visual acuity. Regeneration of corneal nerve fibers is confirmed by means of either in vivo confocal microscopy or ex vivo histopathology. Few self-limiting complications are reported during the postoperative course. Current open issues concern the identification of the technique of choice, the use of autograft or allograft, and the timing of CN either when performed alone or when combined with other surgeries. Conclusions: CN represents a game-changing surgical procedure for NK, which has the potential to restore corneal sensitivity in all stages of the disease regardless of the mechanism of denervation. Further long-term results are needed to confirm its efficacy over time. The design of randomized clinical trials comparing CN with noninterventional therapies could further validate the adoption of this technique