3 research outputs found

    Investigating the accuracy of blood oxygen saturation measurements in common consumer smartwatches

    Get PDF
    Blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) is an important measurement for monitoring patients with acute and chronic conditions that are associated with low blood oxygen levels. While smartwatches may provide a new method for continuous and unobtrusive SpO2 monitoring, it is necessary to understand their accuracy and limitations to ensure that they are used in a fit-for-purpose manner. To determine whether the accuracy of and ability to take SpO2 measurements from consumer smartwatches is different by device type and/or by skin tone, our study recruited patients aged 18–85 years old, with and without chronic pulmonary disease, who were able to provide informed consent. The mean absolute error (MAE), mean directional error (MDE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) were used to evaluate the accuracy of the smartwatches as compared to a clinical grade pulse oximeter. The percent of data unobtainable due to inability of the smartwatch to record SpO2 (missingness) was used to evaluate the measurability of SpO2 from the smartwatches. Skin tones were quantified based on the Fitzpatrick (FP) scale and Individual Typology Angle (ITA), a continuous measure of skin tone. A total of 49 individuals (18 female) were enrolled and completed the study. Using a clinical-grade pulse oximeter as the reference standard, there were statistically significant differences in accuracy between devices, with Apple Watch Series 7 having measurements closest to the reference standard (MAE = 2.2%, MDE = -0.4%, RMSE = 2.9%) and the Garmin Venu 2s having measurements farthest from the reference standard (MAE = 5.8%, MDE = 5.5%, RMSE = 6.7%). There were also significant differences in measurability across devices, with the highest data presence from the Apple Watch Series 7 (88.9% of attempted measurements were successful) and the highest data missingness from the Withings ScanWatch (only 69.5% of attempted measurements were successful). The MAE, RMSE and missingness did not vary significantly across FP skin tone groups, however, there may be a relationship between FP skin tone and MDE (intercept = 0.04, beta coefficient = 0.47, p = 0.04). No statistically significant difference was found between skin tone as measured by ITA and MAE, MDE, RMSE or missingness

    Association of Dry Eye Tests With Extraocular Signs Among 3514 Participants in the Sjögren's Syndrome International Registry

    No full text
    PURPOSE: To identify a screening strategy for dry eye patients with a high likelihood of having Sjogren's syndrome (SS) through the evaluation of the association of ocular surface tests with the extraocular signs used for the diagnosis of SS. DESIGN: Multi-center cross-sectional study. METHODS: The Sjogren's International Clinical Collaborative Alliance (SICCA) registry enrolled 3,514 participants with SS or possible SS from 9 international academic sites. Ocular surface evaluation included Schirmer I testing, tear break-up time (TBUT), and staining of the cornea (0 to 6 points) and conjunctiva (0 to 6 points). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for: 1) histopathologic changes on labial salivary gland (LSG) biopsies (positive = focus score of ≥1 focus/4mm(2)) and 2) positive anti-SSA/B serology. RESULTS: The adjusted odds of having a positive LSG biopsy was significantly higher among those with an abnormal Schirmer I test (adjusted OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.51, P=0.014), positive conjunctival staining (for each additional unit of staining 1.46; 95% CI 1.39 to 1.53, P < 0.001) or corneal staining (for each additional unit of staining 1.14; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.21, P < 0.001). The odds of having a positive serology was significantly higher among those with an abnormal Schirmer I test (adjusted OR=1.3; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.54 P=0.004), and conjunctival staining (adjusted OR=1.51; 95% CI 1.43 to 1.58, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to corneal staining which was associated with a higher likelihood of having a positive LSG biopsy, conjunctival staining and abnormal Schirmer I testing are of critical importance to include when screening dry eye patients for possible SS as they were associated with a higher likelihood of having a positive LSG biopsy and serology
    corecore