An Analysis of General Education Teachers\u27 Use of Diverse Praise

Teacher praise is a strategy that effectively reduces student disruptive and off-task behavior. Although teacher praise has been studied for more than five decades, most research has looked at general and behavior specific praise. There may be other aspects of praise, beyond specificity, that could inform consultation. Examining teachers\u27 diverse use of praise may inform how to maximize this strategy and improve upon teacher training. The purpose of this study was to determine whether teachers\u27 diverse use of praise could be measured. Once it was determined, the data were analyzed to determine how many diverse praise categories teachers used on average and whether differences were noted between early and late grade elementary teachers use of diverse praise. Data for this study were re-analyzed from an original study which included 5721 minutes of direct observation across 28 kindergarten through fifth grade classrooms (approximately 200 min per classroom) to measure teachers\u27 average use of diverse praise categories per observation. Across all 28 classrooms, teachers used 3.7 total diverse praise categories (TDP) per observation. Additionally, on average, teachers used more behavior specific diverse praise (BSDP) than general diverse praise (GDP) categories per observation per hour and this difference was statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of TDP categories coded per observation per hour between early and late elementary classrooms. Lastly, praise adjective, compliance/appreciation, and work GDP categories were used most frequently across all teachers. Implications and future directions are discussed

An Analysis of General Education Teachers\u27 Use of Diverse Praise

Teacher praise is a strategy that effectively reduces student disruptive and off-task behavior. Although teacher praise has been studied for more than five decades, most research has looked at general and behavior specific praise. There may be other aspects of praise, beyond specificity, that could inform consultation. Examining teachers\u27 diverse use of praise may inform how to maximize this strategy and improve upon teacher training. The purpose of this study was to determine whether teachers\u27 diverse use of praise could be measured. Once it was determined, the data were analyzed to determine how many diverse praise categories teachers used on average and whether differences were noted between early and late grade elementary teachers use of diverse praise. Data for this study were re-analyzed from an original study which included 5721 minutes of direct observation across 28 kindergarten through fifth grade classrooms (approximately 200 min per classroom) to measure teachers\u27 average use of diverse praise categories per observation. Across all 28 classrooms, teachers used 3.7 total diverse praise categories (TDP) per observation. Additionally, on average, teachers used more behavior specific diverse praise (BSDP) than general diverse praise (GDP) categories per observation per hour and this difference was statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of TDP categories coded per observation per hour between early and late elementary classrooms. Lastly, praise adjective, compliance/appreciation, and work GDP categories were used most frequently across all teachers. Implications and future directions are discussed

Bison Alter the Northern Yellowstone Ecosystem by Breaking Aspen Saplings

The American bison (Bison bison) is a species that strongly interacts with its environment, yet the effects of this large herbivore on quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) have received little study. We documented bison breaking the stems of aspen saplings (young aspen \u3e 2 m tall and ≤ 5 cm in diameter at breast height) and examined the extent of this effect in northern Yellowstone National Park (YNP). Low densities of Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus canadensis) after about 2004 created conditions conducive for new aspen recruitment in YNP\u27s northern ungulate winter range (northern range). We sampled aspen saplings at local and landscape scales, using random sampling plots in 87 randomly selected aspen stands. Across the YNP northern range, we found that 18% of sapling stems had been broken. The causal attribution to bison was supported by multiple lines of evidence: (1) most broken saplings were in areas of high bison and low elk density; (2) saplings were broken in summer when elk were not foraging on them; (3) we directly observed bison breaking aspen saplings; and (4) mixed-effects modeling showed a positive association between scat density of bison and the proportion of saplings broken. In a stand heavily used by bison, most aspen saplings had been broken, and portions of the stand were cleared of saplings that were present in previous sampling in 2012. Bison numbers increased more than fourfold between 2004 and 2015, and their ecosystem effects have similarly increased, limiting and in some places reversing the nascent aspen recovery. This situation is further complicated by political constraints that prevent bison from dispersing to areas outside the park. Thus, one important conservation goal, the preservation of bison, is affecting another long-term conservation goal, the recovery of aspen and other deciduous woody species in northern Yellowstone

Revisiting Trophic Cascades and Aspen Recovery in Northern Yellowstone

We revisit the nature and extent of trophic cascades and quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) recovery in the northern range of Yellowstone National Park (YNP), where studies have reported on Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus canadensis) browsing and young aspen heights following the St. John, 1995-96 reintroduction of gray wolves (Canis lupus). A recent study by Brice et al. (2021) expressed concerns about methodologies employed in earlier aspen studies and that results from those studies exaggerated the extent to which a trophic cascade has benefitted aspen, concerns such as: (a) the selection of aspen stands, (b) young aspen sampling and measurements within stands, (c) the upper browse level of elk, (d) cause of increased young aspen height growth, (e) interpretation of browsing and height data, and others. We review these concerns but conclude that earlier aspen studies have provided important insights regarding the recovery of aspen that is underway in northern Yellowstone. We also found that Brice et al. (2021) misinterpreted or misrepresented various aspects of those earlier studies, while failing to address potential biases and shortcomings of their own 2007-2017 study, including: (1) sampling aspen stands from only a portion of the park\u27s northern range, (2) not randomly selecting aspen stands across their study area, but only within identified treatments, (3) varying sampling density (stands/km2) by more than an order of magnitude between treatments, and (4) not sampling all stands in most years. Regardless of the advantages or disadvantages of the sampling designs and research methodologies employed in various aspen studies, they have consistently shown that decreased browsing has resulted in greater young plant heights in YNP\u27s northern range, results supportive of an ongoing trophic cascade

Aspen Recruitment in the Yellowstone Region Linked to Reduced Herbivory After Large Carnivore Restoration

Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) recruitment during the 1980s–90s was suppressed by Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus canadensis) herbivory on winter ranges in the Yellowstone region, and saplings (young aspen taller than 2 m) were rare. Following the 1995–96 reintroduction of gray wolves (Canis lupus), browsing decreased and sapling recruitment increased in Yellowstone National Park. We compared aspen data from inside the park to data collected in three winter ranges outside the park. For most areas, the percentage of young aspen browsed annually was 80–100% in 1997–98, decreasing to 30–60% in 2011–15. Sapling recruitment was inversely correlated with browsing intensity, and increased despite climate trends unfavorable for aspen. Browsing decreased with decreasing elk density, a relationship suggesting that densities greater than about 4 elk/km2 resulted in consistently strong browsing effects likely to suppress aspen recruitment. Changes in elk density and distribution were influenced by predators, as well as human hunters. Most evidence for trophic cascades involving large terrestrial mammals has been from protected areas within national parks. This study provides evidence of widespread changes in plant communities resulting from large carnivore restoration, extending outside a protected national park to areas with hunting, livestock grazing, and other human activities

Predation Risk, Elk, and Aspen: Comment

With the exception of humans, gray wolves (Canis lupus) are perhaps the most significant predator of cervids in the northern hemisphere, mainly due to the group-hunting, year-round activity, and widespread geographic distribution (Peterson et al. 2003). Thus, interactions between wolves and large herbivore prey, such as elk (Cervus elaphus) and moose (Alces alces), have long been of interest to biologists (Peterson 1995, Jęodrzejewska et al. 2000, Mech and Boitani 2003). The potential ecological role this apex predator may have, via trophic cascades, has also received attention in recent years by researchers (e.g., Callan et al. 2013, Kuijper et al. 2013, 2014), wildlife management agencies (e.g., state wolf management plans), as well as the general public. Perhaps nowhere in the western United States has a heightened examination of this large predator been more focused than in Yellowstone National Park (YNP; Laundré et al. 2001, Smith et al. 2003, 2013, Fortin et al. 2005). Here, wolves were reintroduced in the mid-1990s, again completing the park\u27s large predator guild after approximately seven decades of absence, thus providing a long-term, landscape-scale, natural experiment (Diamond 1983). The Gallatin winter range is one of two that occur along the northern portion of YNP, the other is the northern ungulate winter range, or “northern range,” located some 25 km or more to the east. Of these, the Gallatin has been less studied. Nevertheless, the Gallatin winter range, like the northern range, experienced high levels of elk herbivory following the extirpation of wolves in the early 1900s. Over a period of approximately seven decades, intensive herbivory by elk led to the long-term decline in aspen (Populus tremuloides) and willow (Salix spp.) recruitment (i.e., growth of young plants above the browse level of elk) in the Gallatin winter range, leaving these plant communities in an impoverished condition (Lovaas 1967, Patten 1968, Kay 2001, Ripple and Beschta 2004, Halofsky and Ripple 2008). Accelerated soil and channel erosion also occurred (Lovaas 1967, Beschta and Ripple 2006). Thus, when wolves were reintroduced into Yellowstone in the mid-1990s, aspen recruitment within the Gallatin elk winter range, had been largely absent for several decades (Kay 2001, Halofsky and Ripple 2008). In 2010, Winnie (2012) sampled 65 aspen stands in the northwestern corner of YNP, within the Gallatin elk winter range, to determine if a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade (BMTC) was occurring. As background information Winnie (2012:2600) included only a single sentence about wolves in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem and the remainder of the paragraph briefly discussed elk numbers, with most of the emphasis on elk in YNP\u27s northern range where there has been a pronounced redistribution of elk since the reintroduction of wolves (White et al. 2012). A more complete summary regarding the status and dynamics of wolves and elk over the last 15 years (i.e., 1995–2010) in the Gallatin elk winter range, as well as in the Daly Creek sub-drainage where Winnie\u27s study occurred, would have helped readers better understand the context of his study. Furthermore, information regarding human harvest of elk in the Gallatin winter range since the return of wolves, or whether such hunting has been affecting elk numbers or distribution in recent years was not provided. As part of his 2010 field study, Winnie (2012) characterized the presence or absence of several hypothesized risk factors (independent variables) for each aspen stand, including escape impediments, visual impediments, distance to conifer forest edge, and presence of deadfall trees. For dependent variables, Winnie (2012) recorded the presence or absence of browsing on aspen suckers (ramets \u3c2 m in height) and the number of aspen juveniles (plants \u3e2 m in height but \u3c6 cm in diameter at breast height). A height of 2 m generally represents the upper browse level of elk, and young aspen exceeding this height are considered to have successfully recruited. Such recruitment would represent a major departure from the browsing suppression that occurred in his study area over recent decades (Kay 2001, Halofsky and Ripple 2008) and an indication that a tri-trophic cascade involving wolves, elk, and aspen may be underway. From the results of his analyses, Winnie (2012:2600) concluded that “aspen were not responding to hypothesized fine-scale risk factors in ways consistent with the current BMTC hypothesis.” We respectfully submit that the design and analysis used to support such a conclusion may be deficient for two reasons, the first based on conceptual concerns and the second on statistical concerns. (1) Unfortunately, some aspen stands Winnie (2012) sampled contained juveniles associated with “physical barriers,” barriers that could prevent elk from browsing young aspen. To be scientifically valid, a risk assessment using young aspen as the dependent variable must inherently assure that all evaluated plants were accessible to elk browsing. (2) The inclusion of 10 aspen stands containing some physically protected aspen likely confounded results from his predation risk analyses (i.e., Figs. 5, 6, and 7 in Winnie 2012). While the inclusion of stands with protected aspen may increase the variance associated with his dependent variables (i.e., browsing rate, number of juveniles), the fallacy of doing so is revealed by inspecting these variables for the 85% of his stands (n = 55 stands) that did not have physically protected aspen. Here, a browsing rate of ∼99% and an average of \u3c1 juvenile per stand occurred (back-transformed means from Fig. 8b and a, respectively [Winnie 2012:2609]), indicating a general lack of variance in the dependent variables associated with these stands and little likelihood of a statistically significant outcome. Thus, we suspect that the “statistically significant” results Winnie (2012) found in Figs. 5, 6, and 7, whether contrary to or in support of a BMTC hypothesis, are primarily influenced by the occurrence of risk factors associated with those stands where some of the young aspen were physically protected. A reanalysis by Winnie of browsing rate and number of juveniles vs. his risk factors, using just the 55 stands accessible to elk, could clarify this issue. Because of the above concerns, we would offer that results of Winnie\u27s (2012) analyses of “proportion of sprouts browsed” or “number of juveniles per stand” relative to his hypothesized risk factors may well be spurious. If so, any discussions and conclusions based on those results are in question. A 2004 field study of aspen stands in the Gallatin winter range found aspen recruitment had declined precipitously following the extirpation of wolves in the 1920s and remained essentially absent through the late 1990s (Halofsky and Ripple 2008). Thus, when Winnie (2012) undertook his field study in 2010, a wolf–elk–aspen trophic cascade had not yet been confirmed. While the occurrence of juvenile aspen would be important to the long-term survival of aspen stands, the data for elk-accessible stands continue to show exceptionally high browse rates and little or no recruitment (Winnie 2012). This situation contrasts with YNP\u27s northern range where decreased browsing and increased heights of young aspen in portions of that range have been observed some 6–10 years after the occurrence of increased willow growth, although this recruitment has been spatially patchy (e.g., Ripple and Beschta 2012, Painter 2013; also see northern range photos of aspen recruitment available online).5 It should be noted that decreased browsing and increased heights of willows in the Gallatin winter range (at the base of the Daly Creek watershed) following the return of wolves, and consistent with the occurrence of a trophic cascade, were documented as early as 1999–2000 (Ripple and Beschta 2004), with heights continuing to increase in more recent years (Beschta and Ripple 2010). Also consistent with a trophic cascade, various northern range studies have found increased willow growth/canopy cover, sometimes interacting with climatic fluctuations, following wolf reintroduction (e.g., Groshong 2004, Beschta and Ripple 2007, Beyer et al. 2007, Baril 2009, Tercek et al. 2010, Marshall 2012). The occurrence of 192 juvenile aspen within Winnie\u27s (2012) study area would seem to indicate the beginnings of a tri-trophic cascade, particularly when compared to the lack of juvenile production in the decades immediately before wolf reintroduction (Halofsky and Ripple 2008). However, most of the 192 juveniles were associated with aspen stands characterized as having some degree of physical protection from elk (Fig. 8a in Winnie 2012), making it difficult to confirm if they represent a wolf–elk–aspen trophic cascade involving density and/or behavioral mediation. A trophic cascade involving aspen can be complex and context dependent (e.g., linked to bottom-up factors such as fire [Eisenberg et al. 2013]). Furthermore, undertaking risk assessments associated with large mammalian predators and ungulates in mountainous terrain, where human hunting is also occurring across part of the landscape, can be especially challenging. While we commend Winnie (2012) for attempting such an assessment, without a reanalysis of only those young aspen accessible to elk it would appear that his evaluation may not have been sufficiently rigorous to evaluate the presence or absence of a potential BMTC in the Gallatin winter range

A rapid and robust method for the cryopreservation of human granulosa cells

Human primary granulosa cells (GCs) derived from women undergoing oocyte retrieval can be cultured and used as a cellular model for the study of human ovarian function. In vitro, they change rapidly, initially resembling cells of the preovulatory follicle and then cells of the corpus luteum. They are derived from individual patients, whose different medical history, lifestyle and age lead to heterogeneity. Thus, cells can rarely be ideally matched for cellular experiments or, if available, only in small quantities. We reasoned that cryopreservation of human GCs may be helpful to improve this situation. Previous studies indicated the feasibility of such an approach, but low survival of human GCs was reported, and effects on human GC functionality were only partially evaluated. We tested a slow freezing protocol (employing FCS and DMSO) for human GCs upon isolation from follicular fluid. We compared cryopreserved and subsequently thawed cells with fresh, non-cryopreserved cells from the same patients. About 80% of human GCs survived freezing/thawing. No differences were found in cell morphology, survival rate in culture, or transcript~levels of mitochondrial (COX4, OPA1, TOMM20), steroidogenic (CYP11A1, CYP19A1) or cell-cell contact genes (GJA1) between the two groups in cells cultured for 1-5~days. A proteomic analysis revealed no statistically significant change in the abundance of a total of 5962 proteins. The two groups produced comparable basal levels of progesterone and responded similarly to hCG with elevation of progesterone. Taken together, our results show this to be a rapid and readily available method for the cryopreservation of human GCs. We anticipate that it will allow future large-scale experiments and may thereby improve cellular studies with human ovarian cells

Wolves and the Ecology of Fear: Can Predation Risk Structure Ecosystems?

We investigated how large carnivores, herbivores, and plants may be linked to the maintenance of native species biodiversity through trophic cascades. The extirpation of wolves (Canis lupus) from Yellowstone National Park in the mid-1920s and their reintroduction in 1995 provided the opportunity to examine the cascading effects of carnivore–herbivore interactions on woody browse species, as well as ecological responses involving riparian functions, beaver (Castor canadensis) populations, and general food webs. Our results indicate that predation risk may have profound effects on the structure of ecosystems and is an important constituent of native biodiversity. Our conclusions are based on theory involving trophic cascades, predation risk, and optimal foraging; on the research literature; and on our own recent studies in Yellowstone National Park. Additional research is needed to understand how the lethal effects of predation interact with its nonlethal effects to structure ecosystems.Keywords: Wolves, Ungulates, Trophic cascades, Predation risk, Woody browse specie

Bison Influences on Composition and Diversity of Riparian Plant Communities in Yellowstone National Park

Riparian zones are among the most biologically diverse ecosystems in the Intermountain West, USA, and provide valuable ecosystem services, including high rates of biotic productivity, nutrient processing, and carbon storage. Thus, their sustainability is a high priority for land managers. Large ungulates affect composition and structure of riparian/stream ecosystems through herbivory and physical effects, via trailing and trampling. Bison (Bison bison) in Yellowstone National Park (YNP) have been characterized as ecosystem engineers because of their demonstrated effects on phenology, aboveground productivity of grasses, and woody vegetation structure. Bison have greatly increased in numbers during the last two decades and spend large periods of time in the broad open floodplains of the Northern Range of the Park, where they are hypothesized to have multiple effects on plant species composition and diversity. We sampled indicators of bison use as well as riparian vegetation composition, diversity, and structure along eight headwater streams within YNP\u27s Northern Range. Total fecal density ranged from 333 to 1833 fecal chips and/or piles/ha, stubble heights ranged from 7 to 49 cm, and streambank disturbance ranged from 9% to 62%. High levels of bison use were positively correlated with exotic species dominance and negatively correlated with species richness, native species diversity, willow (Salix spp.) cover, and wetland species dominance. At three sites, the intensity of bison use exceeded recommended utilization thresholds to avoid degradation of streams and riparian zones on public lands. The influences of large herbivores, principally bison, on vegetation composition and structure suggest the cumulative effects of the current densities on the Northern Range are contributing to biotic impoverishment, representing the loss of ecosystem services that are provided by native riparian plant communities. In addition, contemporary levels of bison use may be exacerbating climate change effects as observed through ungulate-related shifts in composition toward plant assemblages adapted to warmer and drier conditions. However, the resilience of native riparian vegetation suggests that sites currently heavily utilized by bison would have the potential for recovery with a reduction in pressure by this herbivore