Proceedings from the 2nd European Clinical Consensus Conference for device-based therapies for hypertension: state of the art and considerations for the future.

The interest in RDN for hypertension has fluctuated recently, with a flurry of initial enthusiasm followed by sudden loss of interest by researchers and device manufacturers, with an almost as sudden resurgence in clinical trials activity and device innovation more recently. There is widespread consensus that this therapeutic strategy can be effective, at least for some of the technologies available. Major uncertainties remain as to the clinical role of RDN, and whether any of the emerging technologies such as AV-anastomosis formation, carotid body ablation, carotid bulb expansion, or baroreflex stimulation will have a future as effective treatment options in patients with hypertension. In our first consensus report in 2015, the European Expert Group pointed to the major unmet need of standardization of measurements, trial design and procedural performance.6 With the large number of different technologies currently in the pipeline, this need has even increased. Only through high-quality, collaborative research and openness to new methods for recruitment, patient selection, and assessment of outcomes will it be possible to establish incontrovertibly whether device therapies for hypertension are effective and what are preferred patient populations. Once the proof of concept is established, further studies with a design relevant to clinical reality will be needed to establish the place of new devices in the treatment armoury. The clinical and research community has a large responsibility to prove or disprove the value of new therapies, in order to ensure that antihypertensive devices provide future patients with the greatest benefit and the smallest risk. copy; The Author 2017

Mechanical antithrombotic intervention by LAA occlusion in atrial fibrillation

Stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is often associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Oral anticoagulation remains the first-line approach to stroke prevention in such individuals; however, for a considerable proportion of patients, traditional treatment using warfarin is limited by a number of factors, such as the inconvenience of frequent therapeutic monitoring and the risk of haemorrhage. The development of new oral anticoagulants with improved efficacy and safety profiles has provided viable options for oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with nonvalvular (nonrheumatic AF). Nonetheless, in patients who have an increased risk of major haemorrhage, a nonpharmacological approach to antithrombotic therapy remains an attractive alternative. The left atrial appendage (LAA) has been found to be the source of >90% of thrombi in patients with nonvalvular AF; thus, prevention of thrombus formation via transcatheter mechanical LAA occlusion is a novel therapeutic target for stroke prevention in this patient population. In this Review, we present the rationale for LAA occlusion in patients with AF, the available occlusion devices and their clinical evidence to date. We also discuss the roles of various imaging techniques in device implantation and the management strategy for associated procedural complications

Aprotinin prevents proteolytic epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) activation and volume retention in nephrotic syndrome.

Volume retention in nephrotic syndrome has been linked to activation of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) by proteolysis of its γ-subunit following urinary excretion of serine proteases such as plasmin. Here we tested whether pharmacological inhibition of urinary serine protease activity might protect from ENaC activation and volume retention in nephrotic syndrome. Urine from both nephrotic mice (induced by doxorubicin injection) and nephrotic patients exhibited high aprotinin-sensitive serine protease activity. Treatment of nephrotic mice with the serine protease inhibitor aprotinin by means of subcutaneous sustained-release pellets normalized urinary serine protease activity and prevented sodium retention, as did treatment with the ENaC inhibitor amiloride. In the kidney cortex from nephrotic mice, immunofluorescence revealed increased apical γ-ENaC staining, normalized by aprotinin treatment. In Xenopus laevis oocytes heterologously expressing murine ENaC, aprotinin had no direct inhibitory effect on channel activity but prevented proteolytic channel activation. Thus, our study shows that volume retention in experimental nephrotic syndrome is related to proteolytic ENaC activation by proteasuria and can be prevented by treatment with aprotinin. Hence, inhibition of urinary serine protease activity might become a therapeutic approach to treat patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria