18 research outputs found

    IV thrombolysis and renal function

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE To investigate the association of renal impairment on functional outcome and complications in stroke patients treated with IV thrombolysis (IVT). METHODS In this observational study, we compared the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with poor 3-month outcome (modified Rankin Scale scores 3-6), death, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) based on the criteria of the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II trial. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Patients without IVT treatment served as a comparison group. RESULTS Among 4,780 IVT-treated patients, 1,217 (25.5%) had a low GFR (<60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). A GFR decrease by 10 mL/min/1.73 m(2) increased the risk of poor outcome (OR [95% CI]): (ORunadjusted 1.20 [1.17-1.24]; ORadjusted 1.05 [1.01-1.09]), death (ORunadjusted 1.33 [1.28-1.38]; ORadjusted 1.18 [1.11-1.249]), and sICH (ORunadjusted 1.15 [1.01-1.22]; ORadjusted 1.11 [1.04-1.20]). Low GFR was independently associated with poor 3-month outcome (ORadjusted 1.32 [1.10-1.58]), death (ORadjusted 1.73 [1.39-2.14]), and sICH (ORadjusted 1.64 [1.21-2.23]) compared with normal GFR (60-120 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Low GFR (ORadjusted 1.64 [1.21-2.23]) and stroke severity (ORadjusted 1.05 [1.03-1.07]) independently determined sICH. Compared with patients who did not receive IVT, treatment with IVT in patients with low GFR was associated with poor outcome (ORadjusted 1.79 [1.41-2.25]), and with favorable outcome in those with normal GFR (ORadjusted 0.77 [0.63-0.94]). CONCLUSION Renal function significantly modified outcome and complication rates in IVT-treated stroke patients. Lower GFR might be a better risk indicator for sICH than age. A decrease of GFR by 10 mL/min/1.73 m(2) seems to have a similar impact on the risk of death or sICH as a 1-point-higher NIH Stroke Scale score measuring stroke severity

    Effektivität, Effizienz und Sicherheit der Schlaganfall-Telemedizin in Zeiten der Corona-Pandemie

    No full text
    In der vorliegenden Studie wird spirituelle Kompetenz (SpK) in Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie praxisnah untersucht. Einleitend wird dargestellt, dass ebenso wie die World Psychiatric Association (WPA) und andere nationale psychiatrische Fachgesellschaften auch die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Nervenheilkunde (DGPPN) ein Positionspapier zu Religiosität und Spiritualität (R/Sp) in Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie veröffentlicht hat, in dem sie Patientenzentrierung und spirituelle Kompetenz (SpK) der psychiatrischen Berufe fordert. Es wird erläutert, dass Kompetenzmangel das wichtigste Hindernis für die Implementierung von Spiritual Care (SpC) in die klinische Praxis darstellt. In dieser Untersuchung wird die Frage erforscht, wie psychiatrisch Tätige die SpK ihrer eigenen Berufsgruppe einschätzen und welche Variablen dieses Urteil beeinflussen. Insgesamt 391 psychiatrische Pflegekräfte, 75 Psychiater, 119 Therapeuten verschiedener Professionen und 62 andere (n = 647) aus Krankenhäusern in Deutschland und Österreich füllten den 'SpC Competency Questionnaire' (SCCQ) aus. Die Ergebnisse zeigten, dass Pflegekräfte, ältere und spirituell erfahrenere Personen die SpK der eigenen Berufsgruppe vergleichsweise höher einschätzten und seltener meinten, diesbezüglich nicht zuständig zu sein. Pflegende nannten häufiger als andere Berufsgruppen das Fehlen geeigneter Räumlichkeiten als Hindernis für die Implementierung von SpC. Eine höhere Einschätzung der SpK der eigenen Berufsgruppe ging mit höheren Werten in den SCCQ-Faktoren 'Selbsterfahrung und proaktive Öffnung', 'Team-Spirit', 'Wahrnehmungs-/Dokumentationskompetenz' einher. Es wird festgestellt, dass die Zuständigkeit der Gesundheitsberufe für SpC in Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie unter den deutschsprachigen psychiatrischen Berufsgruppen noch kontrovers diskutiert wird. Es wird angenommen, dass dies mit mangelnder Kompetenz in diesem Feld zusammenhängt

    Safety of thrombolysis in stroke mimics: results from a multicenter cohort study.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke is beneficial within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, but the effect rapidly decreases over time, necessitating quick diagnostic in-hospital work-up. Initial time strain occasionally results in treatment of patients with an alternate diagnosis (stroke mimics). We investigated whether intravenous thrombolysis is safe in these patients. METHODS: In this multicenter observational cohort study containing 5581 consecutive patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis, we determined the frequency and the clinical characteristics of stroke mimics. For safety, we compared the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II [ECASS-II] definition) rate of stroke mimics with ischemic strokes. RESULTS: One hundred stroke mimics were identified, resulting in a frequency of 1.8% (95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.2). Patients with a stroke mimic were younger, more often female, and had fewer risk factors except smoking and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack. The symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate in stroke mimics was 1.0% (95% confidence interval, 0.0-5.0) compared with 7.9% (95% confidence interval, 7.2-8.7) in ischemic strokes. CONCLUSIONS: In experienced stroke centers, among patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis, only a few had a final diagnosis other than stroke. The complication rate in these stroke mimics was low

    Sex disparities in re-employment in stroke patients with large vessel occlusion undergoing mechanical thrombectomy

    No full text
    Background: Strokes in the working-age population represent a relevant share of ischemic strokes and re-employment is a major factor for well-being in these patients. Income differences by sex have been suspected a barrier for women in returning to paid work following ischemic stroke. We aim to identify predictors of (not) returning to paid work in patients with large vessel occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) to identify potential areas of targeted vocational rehabilitation. Methods: From 6635 patients enrolled in the German Stroke Registry Endovascular Treatment between 2015 and 2019, data of 606 patients of the working population who survived large vessel occlusion at least 90 days past MT were compared based on employment status at day 90 follow-up. Univariate analysis, multiple logistic regression and analyses of area under the curve were performed to identify predictors of re-employment. Results: We report 35.6% of patients being re-employed 3 months following MT (median age 54.0 years; 36.1% of men, 34.5% of women [P=0.722]). We identified independent negative predictors against re-employment being female sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.427 [95% CI, 0.229–0.794]; P=0.007), higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 24 hours after MT (OR, 0.775 [95% CI, 0.705–0.852]; P<0.001), large vessel occlusion due to large-artery atherosclerosis (OR, 0.558 [95% CI, 0.312–0.997]; P=0.049) and longer hospital stay (OR, 0.930 [95% CI, 0.868–0.998]; P=0.043). Positive predictors favoring re-employment were excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–1) at 90 day follow-up (OR, 11.335 [95% CI, 4.864–26.415]; P<0.001) and combined treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (OR, 1.904 [95% CI, 1.046–3.466]; P=0.035). Multiple regression modeling increased predictive power of re-employment status significantly over prediction by best single functional outcome parameter (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 24 hours after MT ≤5; R2: 0.582 versus 0.432; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.887 versus 0.835, P<0.001). Conclusions: There is more to re-employment after MT than functional outcome alone. In particular, attention should be paid to possible systemic barriers deterring women from resuming paid work

    Sex Differences in Outcome After Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke are Explained by Confounding Factors

    No full text
    Purpose!#!The aim of this study was to analyze sex differences in outcome after thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke in clinical practice in a large prospective multicenter registry.!##!Methods!#!Data of consecutive stroke patients treated with thrombectomy (June 2015-April 2018) derived from an industry-independent registry (German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment) were prospectively analyzed. Multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were applied to determine whether sex is a predictor of functional independence outcome (defined as a modified Rankin scale [mRS] 0-2) 90 days after stroke.!##!Results!#!In total, 2316 patients were included in the analysis, 1170 (50.5%) were female and 1146 (49.5%) were male. Women were older (median age 78 vs. 72 years; p &amp;lt; 0.001) and more frequently had a prestroke functional impairment defined by mRS &amp;gt;1 (24.8% vs. 14.1%; p &amp;lt; 0.001). In unadjusted analyses, independent outcome at 90 days was less frequent in women (33.2%) than men (40.6%; p &amp;lt; 0.001). Likewise, mortality was higher in women than in men (30.7% vs. 26.4%; p = 0.024). In adjusted regression analyses, however, sex was not associated with outcome. Lower age, a lower baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, a higher Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score, prestroke functional independence, successful reperfusion, and concomitant intravenous thrombolysis therapy predicted independent outcome.!##!Conclusion!#!Women showed a worse functional outcome after thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke in clinical practice; however, after adjustment for crucial confounders sex was not a predictor of outcome. The difference in outcome thus appears to result from differences in confounding factors such as age and prestroke functional status

    Systematic evaluation of stroke thrombectomy in clinical practice: The German Stroke Registry Endovascular Treatment

    No full text
    Background: Endovascular treatment has become standard of care for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. However, patients treated in clinical practice differ from the selected populations randomized in clinical trials. Aims: The German Stroke Registry Endovascular Treatment (GSR-ET) aims at a systematic evaluation of outcome, safety, and process parameters of endovascular stroke treatment in standard of care in Germany. Methods: The GSR-ET is an academic, independent, prospective, multicenter, observational registry study. Participating stroke centers from all over of Germany consecutively enroll patients transferred to the angiography suite with an intention to be treated with endovascular stroke treatment. Patients receive regular care. Data are collected as part of clinical routine. Baseline clinical and procedural information and clinical follow-up information after 90 days are recorded. Here, we present an analysis of baseline data of the first 1662 patients included in the GSR-ET. Results: The registry was established in June 2015. By 31 December 2017, 1662 patients were enrolled in 23 active sites. Mean age was 72 +/- 13 years, 50% were female, and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale on admission was 15 (IQR 10-19), 88% had anterior circulation occlusion. Median ASPECT score was 8 (IQR 7-10) prior to intervention. Fifty-nine percent of patients received intravenous thrombolysis prior to thrombectomy. Mean onset-to-groin time was 224 +/- 176 min. Conclusions: Baseline characteristics of stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy in clinical practice differ from those in the randomized trials. The GSR-ET will provide valuable insights into practices of endovascular treatment in routine care of acute ischemic stroke
    corecore