21 research outputs found
Crop Updates - 2003 Oilseeds
This session covers fifteen papers from different authors
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
VARIETIES
Large scale canola varietal evaluation in WA, Peter Nelson, Oilseeds WA
Performance of IT and TT canola varieties in the medium and high rainfall agzones of WA 2001-02, Graham Walton, Hasan Zaheer and Paul Carmody, Department of Agriculture
QUALITY
Reproductive biology, cotyledon development and oil accumulation in canola, J.A. Fortescue and D.W. Turner, School of Plant Biology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Western Australia
Plant and environmental factors affecting oil concentration in canola â a mini-review, D.W. Turner, School of Plant Biology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Western Australia
Potential benefits from interspecific crosses between canola and ânear canolaâ quality Indian mustard, Janet Wroth, School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia (UWA), Wallace Cowling, School of Plant Biology, UWA and CBWA Pty Ltd, Anh-Van Pham, School of Mathematics and Statistics, UWA
NUTRITION, AGRONOMY AND MACHINERY
Timing of nitrogen application for producing canola grain and oil, R. F. Brennan, Department of Agriculture
Managing canola for soil type and moisture stress, Paul Carmody and Hasan Zaheer Department of Agriculture
Machinery lessons from 2002 â canola establishment, Glen Riethmuller, Greg Hamilton and Jo Hawksley, Department of Agriculture
Machinery lessons from 2002 â harvesting short crops, Glen Riethmuller, Department of Agriculture
Does increasing canola seeding rate reduce the competitiveness of grass weeds? Zaicou-Kunesch, C.M., Zaheer, S.H. and Eksteen, D, Department of Agriculture
PESTS AND DISEASES
Aphid damage to canola â not all cultivars are equal, Françoise A. Berlandier and Christiaan Valentine, Department of Agriculture
Should we be worried about developing insecticide resistance in aphids? Owain Edwards, CSIRO Entomology
Benefits provided by treating canola seed with imidacloprid seed dressing, Roger Jones, Brenda Coutts, Lisa Smith and Jenny Hawkes, Department of Agriculture, and Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture
Blackleg levels in canola in 2002, Ravjit Khangura1, Moin Salam1, Art J Diggle1 and Martin J Barbetti1,2 1Department of Agriculture, 2University of Western Australia
DBM in canola, Kevin Walden, Department of Agricultur
Constraint solving in uncertain and dynamic environments - a survey
International audienceThis article follows a tutorial, given by the authors on dynamic constraint solving at CP 2003 (Ninth International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming) in Kinsale, Ireland. It aims at offering an overview of the main approaches and techniques that have been proposed in the domain of constraint satisfaction to deal with uncertain and dynamic environments
Crop Updates 2002 - Pulse Research and Industry Development in Western Australia
This session covers seventy one papers from different authors:
1. 2001 PULSE INDUSTRY HIGHLIGHTS
CONTRIBUTORS
BACKGROUND
2001 REGIONAL ROUNDUP
2. Northern Agricultural Region, M. Harries, Department of Agriculture
3. Central Agricultural Region, R. French and I. Pritchard, Department of Agriculture
4. Great Southern and Lakes, N. Brandon, N. Runciman and S. White, Department of Agriculture
5. Esperance Mallee, M. Seymour, Department of Agriculture
PULSE PRODUCTION AGRONOMY AND GENETIC IMPROVEMENT
6. Faba bean, P. White, Department of Agriculture
7. Germplasm evaluation, P. White, M. Seymour and M. Harries, Department of Agriculture
8. Variety evaluation, P. White, M. Harries, N. Brandon and M. Seymour, Department of Agriculture
9. Sowing rate and time of sowing, P. White, N. Brandon, M. Seymour and M. Harries, Department of Agriculture
10.Use of granular inoculum in the Great Southern, N. Brandon1, J. Howieson2 and R. Yates2 1Department of Agriculture, 2Centre for Rhizobium Studies, Murdoch University
11.Tolerance to post emergent herbicides, M. Seymour and M. Harries, Department of Agriculture
12.Herbicide tolerance of new varieties, H. Dhammu and T. Piper, Department of Agriculture
Desi chickpea
13. Breeding highlights, T. Khan, Department of Agriculture
14. Variety evaluation, T. Khan and K. Regan, Department of Agriculture
15. Effect of genotype and environment on seed quality, N. Suizu1 and D. Diepeveen2 1School of Public Health, Curtin University of Technology 2Department of Agriculture
16. Seed discolouration, C. Veitch and P. White, Department of Agriculture
17. Foliar application on N increases seed yield and seed protein under terminal
drought, J. Palta1,2, A. Nandwal3 and N. Turner1,2 , 1CSIRO Plant Industry, 2CLIMA, the University of Western Australia, 3Department of Botany, Haryana Agric University, Hisar, India
18. Tolerance to chilling at flowering, H. Clarke, CLIMA, The University of Western Australia
19. Molecular studies of ascochyta blight disease in chickpea, G. Dwyer1, H. Loo1, T. Khan2, K. Siddique3, M. Bellgard1 and M. Jones1 ,1WA State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre and Centre for Bioinformatics and Biological Computing, Murdoch University, 2Department of Agriculture, 3CLIMA, The University of Western Australia
20. Effect of row spacing and sowing rate on seed yield, G. Riethmuller and B. MacLeod, Department of Agriculture
21. Herbicide tolerance on marginal soil types, H. Dhammu and T. Piper, Department of Agriculture
22. Kabuli chickpea, K. Regan, Department of Agriculture
23. Variety and germplasm evaluation, T. Khan and K. Regan, Department of Agriculture
24. Premium quality kabuli chickpea development in the ORIA, K. Siddique1, K. Regan2, R. Shackles2 and P. Smith2 , 1 CLIMA, The University of Western Australia, 2Department of Agriculture
25. Evaluation of ascochylta resistant germplasm from Syria and Turkey, K. Siddique1, C. Francis1 and K. Regan2, 1CLIMA, University of Western Australia 2Department of Agriculture
Field pea
26. Breeding highlights, T. Khan Department of Agriculture
27. Variety evaluation, T. Khan Department of Agriculture
28. Comparing the phosphorus requirement of field pea and wheat, M. Bolland and P. White, Department of Agriculture
29. Tolerance of field pea to post emergent herbicides, M. Seymour and N. Brandon, Department of Agriculture
30. Response of new varieties to herbicides, H. Dhammu and T. Piper, Department of Agriculture
31. Lentil, K. Regan, Department of Agriculture
32. Variety evaluation, K. Regan, N. Brandon, M. Harries and M. Seymour, Department of Agriculture
33. Interstate evaluation of advanced breeding lines developed in WA, K. Regan1, K. Siddique2 and M. Materne3, 1Department of Agriculture, 2CLIMA, University of Western Australia, 3Victorian Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Agriculture Victoria
34. Evaluation of germplasm from overseas and local projects, K. Regan1, J. Clements2, K.H.M. Siddique2 and C. Francis21Department of Agriculture, 2CLIMA, University of Western Australia
35. Evaluation of breeding lines developed in WA, K. Regan1, J. Clements2, K.H.M. Siddique2 and C. Francis21Department of Agriculture, 2CLIMA, University of Western Australia
36. Productivity and yield stability in Australia and Nepal, C. Hanbury, K. Siddique and C. Francis, CLIMA, the University of Western Australia
Vetch
37. Germplasm evaluation, M. Seymour1, R. Matic2 and M. Tate3, 1Department of Agriculture, 2South Australian Research and Development Institute, 3University of Adelaide, Waite Campus
38. Tolerance of common vetch to post emergent herbicides, M. Seymour and N. Brandon, Department of Agriculture
Narbon bean
39. Removing narbon bean from wheat, M. Seymour, Department of Agriculture
40. Tolerance to low rates of Roundup and Sprayseed, M. Seymour, Department of Agriculture
41. Lathyrus development, C. Hanbury, CLIMA, the University of Western Australia
42. Poultry feeding trials, C. Hanbury1 and B. Hughes2 ,1CLIMA, the University of Western Australia,2Pig and Poultry Production Institute, South Australia
Pulse Species
43. Species time of sowing, B. French, Department of Agriculture
44. High value pulses in the Great Southern, N. Brandon and N. Runciman, Department of Agriculture
45. Time of Harvest for improved seed yields of pulses, G. Riethmuller and B. French, Department of Agriculture
46. Phosphate acquisition efficiency of pulse crops, P. Rees, Plant Biology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences UWA
DEMONSTRATION OF PULSES IN THE FARMING SYSTEM
47. Howzat desi chickpea in the northern region, M. Harries, Department of Agriculture
48. Field pea harvest losses in the Great Southern and Esperance region, N. Brandon and M. Seymour, Department of Agriculture
49. Timing of crop topping in field pea, N. Brandon and G. Riethmuller, Department of Agriculture
DISEASE AND PEST MANAGEMENT
50. Ascochyta blight of chickpea, B. MacLeod, M. Harries and N. Brandon, Department of Agriculture
51. Evaluation of Australian management packages,
52. Screening foliar fungicides
53. Row spacing and row spraying
54. Ascochyta management package for 2002, B. MacLeod, Department of Agriculture
55. Epidemiology of aschochyta and botrytis disease of pulses, J. Galloway and B. MacLeod, Department of Agriculture
56. Ascochyta blight of chickpea
57. Black spot of field pea
58. Ascochyta blight of faba bean
59. Ascochyta blight of lentil
60. Botrytis grey mould of chickpea
61. Black spot spread: Disease models are based in reality, J. Galloway, Department of Agriculture
62. Black spot spread: Scaling-up field data to simulate âBakers farmâ, M. Salam, J. Galloway, A. Diggle and B. MacLeod, Department of Agriculture
63. Pulse disease diagnostics, N. Burges and D. Wright, Department of Agriculture
Viruses in pulses
64. Incidence of virus diseases in chickpea, J. Hawkes1, D. Thackray1 and R. Jones1,2, 1CLIMA, The University of Western Australia 2Department of Agriculture
Insect pests
65. Risk assessment of aphid feeding damage on pulses, O. Edwards, J. Ridsdill-Smith, and R. Horbury, CSIRO Entomology
66. Optimum spray timing to control aphid feeding damage of faba bean, F. Berlandier, Department of Agriculture
67. Incorporation of pea weevil resistance into a field pea variety, O. Byrne1 and D. Hardie2, 1CLIMA, The University of Western Australia, 2Department of Agriculture
68. Screening wild chickpea species for resistance to Helicoverpa, T. Ridsdill-Smith1 and H. Sharma2,1CSIRO, Entomology, 2ICRISAT, Hyderabad
69. Field strategies to manage the evolution of pea weevil resistance in transgenic field pea, M. de Sousa Majer1, R. Roush2, D. Hardie3, R. Morton4 and T. Higgins4, 1Curtin University of Technology, 2Waite Campus, University of Adelaide, 3Department of Agriculture, 4CSIRO Plant Industry, Canberra
70. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
71. Appendix 1: Summary of previous result
Crop Updates 2000 - Pulses
This session covers fifty nine papers from different authors:
1.1999 PULSE INDUSTRY HIGHLIGHTS
2. CONTRIBUTORS
3. BACKGROUND
4. SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS RESULTS
5. 1999 REGIONAL ROUNDUP
6. Northern Agricultural Region, W. OâNeill, AGWEST
7. Central Agricultural Region J. Russell and R.J. French AGWEST
8. Great Southern and Lakes N. Brandon, C. Gaskin and N. Runciman, AGWEST
9. Esperance Mallee M. Seymour, AGWEST
PULSE PRODUCTION AGRONOMY AND GENETIC IMPROVEMENT
10. Faba Bean
11. Desi chickpea Traits associated with drought resistance in chickpea, J. Berger, N.C. Turner, CLIMA and CSIRO Plant Industry, R.J. French, AGWEST, R. Carpenter, C. Ludwig and R. Kenney, CSIRO Plant Industry
12. Genotype x environment analysis of chickpea adaptation, J. Berger and N. Turner, CLIMA and CSIRO Plant Industry, and K.H.M. Siddique, AGWEST
13. Carbon fixation by chickpea pods under terminal drought, Q. Ma, CLIMA, M.H. Behboudian, Massey University, New Zealand, N.C. Turner and J.A. Palta, CLIMA, and CSIRO Plant Industry
14. Influence of terminal drought on growth and seed quality, M.H. Behboudian, Massey University, New Zealand, Q. Ma, CLIMA, N.C. Turner and J.A. Palta, CSIRO Plant Industry
15. Resistance to chilling at flowering and to budworm, H. Clarke, CLIMA
Chickpea nodulation survey, J. Stott and J. Howieson, Centre for Rhizobium Studies, Murdoch University
16. Kabuli chickpea 17. Premium quality kabuli chickpea development in the ORIA, K.H.M. Siddique CLIMA and AGWEST, K.L. Regan, AGWEST, R. Shackles, AGWEST 18. International screening for Ascochyta blight resistance, K.H.M. Siddique CLIMA and AGWEST, C. Francis, CLIMA, K.L. Regan, AGWEST, N. Acikgoz and N. Atikyilmaz, AARI, Turkey and R.S. Malholtra, ICARDA, Syria 19. Agronomic evaluation of Ascochyta resistant kabuli germplasm in WA, K.H.M. Siddique CLIMA and AGWESTC. Francis, CLIMA, K.L. Regan and M. Baker, AGWEST 20. Field Pea 21. Lentil
22. ACIAR project J. Clements, K.H.M. Siddique CLIMA and AGWEST and C. Francis CLIMA
23. Vetch
24. Rust, M. Seymour, AGWEST
25. Narbon bean 26. Agronomy, M. Seymour, AGWEST
27. Lupinus species
28. Screening lupins for tolerance to alkaline/calcareous soils, C. Tang, CLIMA andUniversity of WAand J.D. Brand, WAITE, University of Adelaide
29. Lathyrus development, C. Hanbury and K.H.M. Siddique, CLIMA and AGWEST
30. Sheep feeding studies, C. White, CSIRO, Perth, C. Hanbury, CLIMA and K.H.M. Siddique, CLIMA and AGWEST 31. Lathyrus: a potential new ingredient in pig diets, B.P. Mullan, C.D. Hanbury and K.H.M. Siddique, AGWEST 32. Species comparison
33. Species for horticultural rotations, K.H.M. Siddique, AGWEST, R. Lancaster and I. Guthridge AGWEST
34. Marrow fat field pea shows promise in the southwest, K.H.M. Siddique, AGWEST, N. Runciman, AGWEST, and I. Pritchard, AGWEST,
35. Pulses on grey clay soils, P. Fisher, M. Braimbridge, J. Bignell, N. Brandon, R. Beermier, W. Bowden, AGWEST
36. Nutrient management of pulses 37. Summary of pulse nutrition studies in WA, M.D.A. Bolland, K.H.M. Siddique, G.P. Riethmuller, and R.F. Brennan, AGWEST 38. Pulse species response to phosphorus and zinc, S. Lawrence, Zed Rengel, University of WA, S.P. Loss, CSBP futurefarm, M.D.A. Bolland, .H.M. Siddique, W. Bowden, AGWEST 39. Gypsum
40. Antitranspirants
seed priming
DEMONSTRATION OF PULSES IN THE FARMING SYSTEM
41. Foliar and soil applied nutrients for field peas in the south coast mallee,M. Seymour, AGWEST, and P. Vedeniapine, Phosyn Ltd 42. Demonstration of pulse species at Kendenup, C. Kirkwood, Farmer, Katanning, R. Beermier, N. Runciman and N. Brandon, AGWEST 43. Kabuli chickpea demonstration at Gnowangerup, R. Beermier and N. Brandon, AGWEST 44. Lathyrus sativus demonstration at Mindarabin, N. Brandon and R. Beermier, AGWEST 45. New field pea varieties in the central eastern region, J. Russell, AGWEST
DISEASE AND PEST MANAGEMENT
46. Ascochyta blight of chickpea
47. Botrytis grey mould (BGM) of chickpea 48. Fungal disease diagnostics, Pulse disease diagnostics, D. Wright, AGWEST Plant Laboratories 49. Viruses in pulses, Luteovirus infection in field pea and faba bean crops, and viruses in seed, L. Latham, CLIMA and AGWEST, R. Jones, AGWEST 50. Screening of pulse species for pea seed-borne mosaic virus, L. Latham, CLIMAand AGWEST, and R. Jones, AGWEST 51. CMV in chickpea: effect of seed-borne sources on virus spread and seed yield, R. Jones, AGWEST and L. Latham, CLIMA and AGWEST
52. Insect pests 53. Evaluation of transgenic field pea against the pea weevil,M.J. de Sousa Majer, School of Environmental Biology, Curtin University of Technology,, D. Hardie, and N.C. Turner, CSIRO Division of Plant Industry 54. Development of a molecular marker for pea weevil resistance in field pea, Oonagh Byrne, CLIMA, Darryl Hardie, AGWEST and Penny Smith, UWA 55. Aphid feeding damage to faba bean and lentil crops, Françoise Berlandier, AGWEST 56. Taxonomy and control of bruchids in pulses, N. Keals, CLIMA, D. Hardie and R. Emery, AGWEST, 57. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 58. PUBLICATIONS BY PULSE PRODUCTIVITY PROJECT STAFF
59. VARIETIES PRODUCED AND COMMERCIALLY RELEASE
Crop Updates 2003 - -Katanning
This session covers sixteen papers from different authors
Breeding Cereals for Rust Resistance â are we losing the battle? Robert F. Park, University of Sydney
Stripe rust â where to now for the WA wheat industry? Robert Loughman, Department of Agriculture, Colin Wellings, University of Sydney, Greg Shea, Department of Agriculture
Oaten hay production, Jocelyn Ball, Natasha Littlewood and Lucy Creagh, Department of Agriculture
Donât rely on âSpray and Prayâ Alex Douglas, Department of Agriculture
Seasonal outlook: What is in store for 2003, David Stephens, Department of Agriculture
No-till copper, phosphorus and zinc experiments, Ross Brennan and Mike Bolland, Department of Agriculture
Wheat nutrition in the high rainfall zone, Narelle Hill, Department of Agriculture
Aphid damage to cereal grain crops, Phil Michael, Department of Agriculture
Aphid damage to canola â not all cultivars are equal, Francoise A. Berlandier and Christiaan Valentine, Department of Agriculture
Overcropping Lucerne, Roy Latta, Department of Agriculture
Future direction of field pea varieties, M. Rodger Beermier, Department of Agriculture
Selecting the right pasture for the job, Keith Devenish, Department of Agriculture
Topping up pasture seedbanks, Keith Devenish, Department of Agriculture
Baudin and Hamlin New generation of malting barleys, Blakely Paynter, Roslyn Jettner and Kevin Young, Department of Agriculture
Wheat variety performance in 2002 compared to the long term, Robin Wilson, Ian Barclay Robyn McLean, Robert Loughman, Jenny Garlinge, Bill Lambe, Neil Venn and Peter Clarke, Department of Agriculture
The role of green manure crops in renovating poor performing paddocks: Whatâs it worth? Francis Hoyle, Leanne Schulz and Judith Devenish, Department of Agricultur
Effect of strain-specific hypersensitive resistance on spatial patterns of virus spread
Spatial patterns of spread were compared between strains of Bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV) that differ in causing systemic necrotic (hypersensitive) or non-necrotic symptoms in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius). Both types of BYMV were spread naturally by aphids from adjacent infected pasture into a large lupin block ('natural spread site'), or from clover plants introduced as virus sources into two field experiments with lupin. Cumulative spatial data for plants with disease symptoms from a range of times in the growing period were assessed using Spatial Analysis by Distance IndicEs (SADIE). At the 'natural spread site', with non-necrotic BYMV, the extent of clustering of plants with symptoms increased gradually over time, while with necrotic BYMV there was less clustering and no increase over time. In both experiments, for the type of BYMV that was introduced into a plot, there was a gradual increase in clustering, but with this being greater with non-necrotic BYMV. In the second experiment, there was also significant clustering of plants with symptoms of non-necrotic BYMV in plots without introduced non-necrotic foci but not for necrotic BYMV in plots without introduced necrotic foci. When clustering data for plants with newly recorded symptoms was tested for spatial association between successive assessment dates, association was positive for both BYMV types though stronger for the non-necrotic type, declining as the temporal lag increased. Generally, association was strongest for assessments 2-3 wk apart, corresponding approximately to the period for BYMV to move systemically in plants and for obvious symptoms to appear in shoot tips. Contour maps for local association between dates showed that the strongest spatial associations were from coincidence of infection gaps rather than infection patches. The combination of information from clustering and association analysis showed that spread of non-necrotic BYMV is less diffuse, with considerably more localised infection surrounding the infection sources. This work demonstrates how spatial virus spread can be diminished when hypersensitive (necrotic) resistance is deployed, and the limitations associated with employing hypersensitivity that is strain specific