Augmenting neurocognitive remediation therapy to Preventive Cognitive Therapy for partially remitted depressed patients:protocol of a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial

Introduction Major depressive disorder (MDD) affects 163 million people globally every year. Individuals who experience subsyndromal depressive symptoms during remission (ie, partial remission of MDD) are especially at risk for a return to a depressive episode within an average of 4 months. Simultaneously, partial remission of MDD is associated with work and (psycho)social impairment and a lower quality of life. Brief psychological interventions such as preventive cognitive therapy (PCT) can reduce depressive symptoms or relapse for patients in partial remission, although achieving full remission with treatment is still a clinical challenge. Treatment might be more effective if cognitive functioning of patients is targeted as well since cognitive problems are the most persisting symptom in partial remission and predict poor treatment response and worse functioning. Studies show that cognitive functioning of patients with (remitted) MDD can be improved by online neurocognitive remediation therapy (oNCRT). Augmenting oNCRT to PCT might improve treatment effects for these patients by strengthening their cognitive functioning alongside a psychological intervention. Methods and analysis This study will examine the effectiveness of augmenting oNCRT to PCT in a pragmatic national multicentre superiority randomised controlled trial. We will include 115 adults partially remitted from MDD with subsyndromal depressive symptoms defined as a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score between 8 and 15. Participants will be randomly allocated to PCT with oNCRT, or PCT only. Primary outcome measure is the effect on depressive symptomatology over 1 year. Secondary outcomes include time to relapse, cognitive functioning, quality of life and healthcare costs. This first dual approach study of augmenting oNCRT to PCT might facilitate full remission in partially remitted individuals as well as prevent relapse over time. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was obtained by Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam. Outcomes will be made publicly available

Treatment-resistant depression and suicidality

Background: Thirty percent of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) attempt suicide at least once during their lifetime. However, it is unclear what the attempted and completed suicide incidences are in TRD patients after initiating a treatment, and whether specific treatments increase or decrease these incidences. Methods: We searched PubMed systematically for studies of depressed patients who failed at least two antidepressant therapies and were followed for at least three months after initiating a treatment. We estimated attempted and completed suicide incidences using a Poisson meta-analysis. Given the lack of controlled comparisons, we used a meta-regression to estimate whether these incidences differed between treatments. Results: We included 30 studies investigating suicidality in 32 TRD samples, undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS, n = 9), vagal nerve stimulation (VNS, n = 9), electroconvulsive therapy (ECT, n = 5), treatment-as-usual (n = 3), capsulotomy (n = 2), cognitive behavioral therapy (n = 2), ketamine (n = 1), and epidural cortical stimulation (n = 1). The overall incidence of completed suicides was 0.47 per 100 patient years (95% CI: 0.22–1.00), and of attempted suicides 4.66 per 100 patient years (95% CI: 3.53–6.23). No differences were found in incidences following DBS, VNS or ECT. Limitations: Suicidality is poorly recorded in many studies limiting the number of studies available. Conclusions: The completed and attempted suicide incidences are high (0.47 and 4.66 per 100 patient years respectively), but these incidences did not differ between three end of the line treatments (DBS, VNS or ECT). Given the high suicide risk in TRD patients, clinical trials should consider suicidality as an explicit outcome measure

Cognitive behavioral therapy for misophonia: A randomized clinical trial

Background: Patients with misophonia suffer from anger or disgust confronted with specific sounds such as smacking or breathing. Avoidance of cue-related situations results in social isolation and significant functional impairment. This is the first randomized, controlled cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) trial for misophonia, evaluating the short- and long-term efficacy. Methods: The evaluator-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted from May 2017 until December 2018 at an academic outpatient clinic. Misophonia patients were randomly assigned to 3 months of weekly group-CBT or a waiting list and tested at baseline, 3 months (following CBT or waiting list), 6 months (after cross-over), and 15/18 months (1-year follow-up). CBT consisted of task concentration and arousal reduction, positive affect labeling, and stimulus manipulation. Co-primary outcomes were symptom severity assessed by the Amsterdam Misophonia Scale-Revised (AMISOS-R) and improvement on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I). Secondary outcomes were self-assessed ratings of general psychopathology (Symptom Checklist-90-Revised [SCL-90-R]) and quality of life (five-dimensional EuroQol [EQ5-D], Sheehan Disability Scale [SDS], WHO Quality of Life-BREF [WHOQoL-BREF]). Results: In all, 54 out of 71 patients were included (mean age, 33.06 [SD, 14.13] years; 38 women [70.4%]) and 46 (85%) completed the study. In the randomized phase, CBT resulted in statistically significant less misophonia symptoms in the short-term (−9.7 AMISOS-R; 95% CI, −12.0 to −7.4; p <.001, d = 1.97). The CBT group had an observed clinical improvement (CGI-I < 3) in 37% compared to 0% in the waiting list group (p <.001). The effect of CBT was maintained at 1-year follow-up on primary and secondary outcomes. Conclusions: This first randomized control trial shows both short-term and long-term efficacy of CBT for misophonia

Episodic memory following deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule and electroconvulsive therapy

BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) and Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) are effective treatments for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, a common side effect of ECT is autobiographical memory loss (e.g., personal experiences), whereas the impact of DBS on autobiographical memories has never been established. OBJECTIVE: Comparing autobiographical memories following DBS and ECT. METHODS: In two hospitals in The Netherlands, we interviewed 25 TRD patients treated with DBS of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (vALIC), 14 TRD patients treated with ECT and 22 healthy controls (HC) with the Autobiographical Memory Inventory - Short Form (AMI-SF) in a prospective, longitudinal study between March 2010 and August 2016. Patients treated with DBS were interviewed before surgery, after surgery, and twice during treatment over 122.7 (SD: ±22.2) weeks. Patients treated with ECT were tested before ECT, after six right unilateral (RUL) ECT sessions and twice following ECT over 65.1 (±9.3) weeks. Controls were tested four times over 81.5 (±15.6) weeks. RESULTS: Compared to HC, the AMI-SF score decreased faster in both TRD groups (P < 0.001). More specifically, AMI-SF score decreased in a comparable rate as HC after DBS surgery, but decreased more during treatment. The AMI-SF decrease in the ECT group was larger than both the DBS and HC groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both ECT and vALIC DBS result in a faster autobiographical memory decline compared to HC. DBS might have a negative impact on autobiographical memories, although less so than ECT. Future work should dissect whether DBS or characteristics of TRD cause this decline

Cost-effectiveness of deep brain stimulation versus treatment as usual for obsessive-compulsive disorder

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is effective for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but requires expensive medical procedures. To date, no study has examined the cost-effectiveness of DBS for OCD. To perform the first economic evaluation of DBS for therapy refractory OCD. We conducted a 2-year prospective, open cost-effectiveness study, comparing DBS (n = 17) with treatment as usual (TAU) (n = 11), with cost per Quality-Adjusted-Life-Year (QALY) as outcome measure. Apart from the base-case, or primary analysis, we conducted two practice-based scenarios: (1) standard care scenario, without research and innovation costs, and (2) rechargeable scenario, in which we assume the use of a rechargeable battery. Base-case and both scenarios were extrapolated to four years to estimate long-term cost-effectiveness. Compared to TAU, DBS provides an additional 0.26 QALY (SD = 0.16). Median cost per QALY gained is estimated at €141,446 for base-case, €115,916 for standard care and €65,394 for the rechargeable scenario. Extending the time-horizon to four years results in a median cost per QALY of €80,313 for base-case, €69,287 for standard care, and turned out to be cost-saving at €4678 per QALY for the rechargeable scenario. Assuming a willingness to pay threshold of €80,000/QALY, DBS, under base-case and standard care had 25% and 35% probability of being more cost-effective than TAU. With the rechargeable scenario and in all scenarios extrapolated to four years, the probability of cost-effectiveness was equal or higher than TAU. This study indicates DBS for OCD is cost-effective in the long-term, especially when rechargeable batteries are taken into accoun

Deep brain stimulation versus ablative surgery for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis

Objective: Ablative surgery (ABL) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) are last-resort treatment options for patients suffering from treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The aim of this study was to conduct an updated meta-analysis comparing the clinical outcomes of the ablative procedures capsulotomy and cingulotomy and deep brain stimulation. Methods: We conducted a PubMed search to identify all clinical trials on capsulotomy, cingulotomy, and DBS. Random effects meta-analyses were performed on 38 articles with a primary focus on efficacy in reducing OCD symptoms as measured by a reduction in the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score and the responder rate (≥35% reduction in Y-BOCS score). Results: With responder rates of 48% and 53% after 12–16 months and 56% and 57% at last follow-up for ABL and DBS, respectively, and large effect sizes in the reduction in Y-BOCS scores, both surgical modalities show effectiveness in treating refractory OCD. Meta-regression did not show a statistically significant difference between ABL and DBS regarding these outcomes. Regarding adverse events, a statistically significant higher rate of impulsivity is reported in studies on DBS. Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows equal efficacy of ABL and DBS in the treatment of refractory OCD. For now, the choice of intervention should, therefore, rely on factors such as risk of developing impulsivity, patient preferences, and experiences of psychiatrist and neurosurgeon. Future research should provide more insight regarding differences between ABL and DBS and response prediction following direct comparisons between the surgical modalities, to enable personalized and legitimate choices between ABL and DBS

Apathy Induced by Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Apathy, the loss of motivation, is a common problem in Parkinson's disease (PD) and often observed following deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN). The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the occurrence of apathy following STN DBS in literature. Relevant articles were searched in PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Web of Sciences electronic databases. Studies were included if they reported apathy scores pre- and post-DBS or the cross-sectional difference between PD patients receiving STN DBS and patients receiving medication only. Thirty-three articles were included in the meta-analyses from 6,658 screened articles by two authors independently. A total of 1,286 patients were included with a mean age (±standard deviation [SD]) of 58.4 ± 8.5 years and a disease duration of 11.0 ± 5.8 years. The apathy score measured by means of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES), Starkstein Apathy Scale (SAS), and the Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) was significantly higher after DBS than pre-operatively (g = 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.19-0.48, P < 0.001). An equal, significant difference in severity of apathy was found between STN DBS and medication only (g = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.03-0.65; P = 0.004). Statistical heterogeneity was moderately high, but the effects stood strong after multiple analyses and were independent of tapering off dopaminergic medication. The findings of this meta-analysis indicate that apathy is increased after STN DBS compared to the pre-operative state and to medication only (systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42019133932). © 2020 Universiteit van Amsterdam. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Cognitive behavioral therapy for misophonia: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Patients with misophonia suffer from anger or disgust confronted with specific sounds such as smacking or breathing. Avoidance of cue-related situations results in social isolation and significant functional impairment. This is the first randomized, controlled cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) trial for misophonia, evaluating the short- and long-term efficacy. METHODS: The evaluator-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted from May 2017 until December 2018 at an academic outpatient clinic. Misophonia patients were randomly assigned to 3 months of weekly group-CBT or a waiting list and tested at baseline, 3 months (following CBT or waiting list), 6 months (after cross-over), and 15/18 months (1-year follow-up). CBT consisted of task concentration and arousal reduction, positive affect labeling, and stimulus manipulation. Co-primary outcomes were symptom severity assessed by the Amsterdam Misophonia Scale-Revised (AMISOS-R) and improvement on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I). Secondary outcomes were self-assessed ratings of general psychopathology (Symptom Checklist-90-Revised [SCL-90-R]) and quality of life (five-dimensional EuroQol [EQ5-D], Sheehan Disability Scale [SDS], WHO Quality of Life-BREF [WHOQoL-BREF]). RESULTS: In all, 54 out of 71 patients were included (mean age, 33.06 [SD, 14.13] years; 38 women [70.4%]) and 46 (85%) completed the study. In the randomized phase, CBT resulted in statistically significant less misophonia symptoms in the short-term (-9.7 AMISOS-R; 95% CI, -12.0 to -7.4; p < .001, d = 1.97). The CBT group had an observed clinical improvement (CGI-I < 3) in 37% compared to 0% in the waiting list group (p < .001). The effect of CBT was maintained at 1-year follow-up on primary and secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This first randomized control trial shows both short-term and long-term efficacy of CBT for misophonia