The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: A systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from The Royal Society via the DOI in this record.In recent years, new genome editing technologies have emerged that can edit the genome of non-human animals with progressively increasing efficiency. Despite ongoing academic debate about the ethical implications of these technologies, no comprehensive overview of this debate exists. To address this gap in the literature, we conducted a systematic review of the reasons for and against the development and use of genome editing technologies in animals reported in the academic literature. Most included articles were written by academics from the biomedical or animal sciences. The reported reasons related to seven themes: human health, efficiency, risks and uncertainty, animal welfare, animal dignity, environmental considerations and public acceptability. Our findings illuminate several key considerations about the academic debate, including the underrepresentation of animal interests, a lack of disciplinary diversity in the contributing academics, a scarcity of systematic comparisons of potential consequences of using these technologies, and a disjunction between the public and academic debate on this topic. As such, this article can be considered a call for a broad range of academics to get increasingly involved in the discussion about genome editing, to incorporate animal interests and systematic comparisons, and to further discuss the aims and methods of public involvement.Division of Applied and Engineering Sciences of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Researc