A Liver Index and its Relationship to Indices of HCC Aggressiveness

A Hepatocellular (HCC) Aggressiveness Index was recently constructed, consisting of the sum of the scores for the 4 clinical parameters of maximum tumor size, multifocality, presence of portal vein thrombus and blood alphafetoprotein levels. It was observed that there was an association with several liver function tests. We have now formed a Liver Index from the 4 liver parameters with the highest hazard ratios with respect to HCC aggressiveness, namely: blood total bilirubin, gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGTP), albumin and platelet levels (cirrhosis surrogate). We found that the scores for the Liver Index related significantly to survival, but also to the Aggressiveness Index and to its individual HCC components as well as showing significant trends with the components. These results support the hypothesis that liver function is not only an important prognostic factor in HCC patients, but may also be involved in HCC biology and aggressiveness. Blood albumin, GGTP, albumin and platelet levels were used to create a Liver Index that related significantly to parameters of HCC aggressiveness

Prognosis of untreated hepatocellular carcinoma.

The prognosis of untreated patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is heterogeneous, and survival data were mainly obtained from control arms of randomized studies. Clinical practice data on this topic are urgently needed, so as to help plan studies and counsel patients. We assessed the prognosis of 600 untreated patients with HCC managed by the Italian Liver Cancer Group. Prognosis was evaluated by subdividing patients according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification. We also assessed the main demographic, clinical, and oncological determinants of survival in the subgroup of patients with advanced HCC (BCLC C). Advanced (BCLC C: n5138; 23.0%) and end-stage HCC (BCLC D; n5210; 35.0%) represented the majority of patients. Overall median survival was 9 months, and the principal cause of death was tumor progression (n5279; 46.5%). Patients\u2019 median survival progressively and significantly decreased as BCLC stage worsened (BCLC 0: 38 months; BCLC A: 25 months; BCLC B: 10 months; BCLC C: 7 months; BCLC D: 6 months; P < 0.0001). Female gender (hazard ratio [HR]50.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]50.33-0.90; P50.018), ascites (HR51.81; 95% CI51.21-2.71; P50.004), and multinodular (>3) HCC (HR51.79; 95% CI51.21-2.63; P50.003) were independent predictors of survival in patients with advanced HCC (BCLC C). Conclusion: BCLC adequately predicts the prognosis of untreated HCC patients. In untreated patients with advanced HCC, female gender, clinical decompensation of cirrhosis, and multinodular tumor are independent prognostic predictors and should be taken into account for patient stratification in future therapeutic studies. (HEPATOLOGY 2015;61:184-190

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma need a personalized management: A lesson from clinical practice

N/

Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis (CC) can develop hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), although the clinical characteristics of HCC in these patients have not been completely defined. We aimed to characterize the clinical features of patients diagnosed with HCC after CC during a 15-year period (1992-2006). METHODS: The clinical characteristics of 45 consecutive CC patients with HCC were analyzed, along with modality of diagnosis, tumor stage, treatment, survival, and causes of death. Data were compared with those of 426 consecutive patients with HCC and only hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, diagnosed during the same period at the Italian Liver Cancer group centers. RESULTS: HCC patients with CC had similar impairments in liver function as patients with HCV infection (Child-Pugh class A: 53% vs 65%; P = .141). However, the HCC patients with CC had lower aminotransferase levels (P < .001) and higher platelet counts (P < .001). HCC was significantly less likely to be diagnosed during surveillance in CC patients (29% vs 64%; P < .0001). Patients with CC had a significantly greater prevalence of advanced HCC stage, according to Milano criteria (69% vs 41%; P < .0005), larger HCC size (4.9 vs 3.0 cm; P = .0001), lower amenability to any treatment (27% vs 42%; P = .036), and shorter survival times (P = .009, log-rank test) compared with HCV patients. Causes of death were similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with HCV patients, HCC in CC patients often is diagnosed at an advanced stage, probably owing to lack of surveillance; this leads to limited treatment options and shorter survival times

Application of the Intermediate-Stage Subclassification to Patients with Untreated Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES:The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) intermediate stage (BCLC B) includes a heterogeneous population of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, in order to facilitate treatment decisions, a panel of experts proposed to subclassify BCLC B patients. In this study, we aimed to assess the prognostic capability of the BCLC B stage reclassification in a large cohort of patients with untreated HCC managed by the Italian Liver Cancer Group.METHODS:We assessed the prognosis of 269 untreated HCC patients observed in the period 1987-2012 who were reclassified according to the proposed subclassification of the BCLC B stage from stage B1 to stage B4. We evaluated and compared the survival of the various substages.RESULTS:Median survival progressively decreased from stage B1 (n=65, 24.2%: 25 months) through stages B2 (n=105, 39.0%: 16 months) and B3 (n=22, 8.2%: 9 months), to stage B4 (n=77, 28.6%: 5 months; P<0.0001). Moreover, we observed a significantly different survival between contiguous stages (B1 vs. B2, P=0.0002; B2 vs. B3, P<0.0001; B3 vs. B4, P=0.0219). In multivariate analysis, the BCLC B subclassification (P<0.0001), MELD score (P=0.0013), and platelet count (P=0.0252) were independent predictors of survival.CONCLUSIONS:The subclassification of the intermediate-stage HCC predicts the prognosis of patients with untreated HCC. The prognostic figures identified in this study may be used as a benchmark to assess the efficacy of therapeutic intervention in the various BCLC B substages, whereas it remains to be established whether incorporation of the MELD score might improve the prognosis of treated patients

The evolutionary scenario of hepatocellular carcinoma in Italy: an update

Background & Aims: Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma is changing worldwide. This study aimed at evaluating the changing scenario of aetiology, presentation, management and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in Italy during the last 15\ua0years. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the ITA.LI.CA (Italian Liver Cancer) database including 5192 hepatocellular carcinoma patients managed in 24 centres from 2000 to 2014. Patients were divided into three groups according to the date of cancer diagnosis (2000\u20132004, 2005\u20132009 and 2010\u20132014). Results: The main results were as follows: (i) progressive patient aging; (ii) progressive expansion of non-viral cases and, namely, of \u201cmetabolic\u201d hepatocellular carcinomas; (iii) increasing proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosed during a correct (semi-annual) surveillance programme; (iv) favourable cancer stage migration; (v) increased use of radiofrequency ablation to the detriment of percutaneous ethanol injection; (vi) improved outcomes of ablative and transarterial treatments; (vii) improved overall survival (adjusted for the lead time in surveyed patients), particularly after 2009, of both viral and non-viral patients presenting with an early- or intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions: During the last 15\ua0years several aetiological and clinical features of hepatocellular carcinoma patients have changed, as their management. The observed improvement of overall survival was owing both to the wider use of semi-annual surveillance, expanding the proportion of tumours that qualified for curative treatments, and to the improved outcome of loco-regional treatments