Immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients aged 80 or older with advanced non-small cell lung cancer or melanoma: a real-life multicentre study

International audienceBackground Data regarding characteristics, safety and survival outcomes of patients aged 80 or older treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in routine oncology practice are limited. Materials and methods We retrospectively collected data of patients aged 80 and older with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or melanoma treated with anti-PD1, anti-PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4 regardless of the treatment line, in 14 institutions, between January 2014 and June 2017. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with the Kaplan Meier method. Toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE 5.0. Multivariate analyses were performed with the Cox model. Results Eighty-two patients were included (36 with NSCLC, 45 with melanoma). Their median age was 82 years (range 80-93). Nivolumab and pembrolizumab were mainly used. In the NSCLC group, median PFS and OS were 2.3 months (95%CI 1.8-6.1) and 8.8 months (95%CI 5.5-18.1), respectively. In the melanoma group, median PFS and OS were 10.2 months (95%CI 4.5-20.0) and 24.5 months (95%CI 14.1-NR), respectively. The albumin level was found to be independently associated with a better OS in both groups. Grade 3-4 toxicities occurred in 15 patients (18.5%). One patient died from ICI-induced pulmonary toxicity. Conclusion Our study findings suggest that treatment with ICI in elderly patients with NSCLC and melanoma has a risk-benefit ratio that supports its use. However, we report in this cohort that one in five patients has a grade 3-4 IRAEs leading to treatment discontinuation. Geriatric assessment prior to initiation of therapy and during therapy should be routine in patients aged 80 years and older

Clinical and histological study of follicular helper T-cell lymphomas with indolent evolution

International audienceINTRODUCTION: Follicular helper T-cell lymphomas (TFHL) have an aggressive course with a poor outcome. European and US guidelines recommend anthracycline-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment, but the 5-year overall survival rate is still approximately 30%. We describe here the features of a cohort of TFHL patients who experienced prolonged survival despite the absence of specific treatment or the initiation of steroid-based therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In our study, we describe 15 adult patients who suffered from TFHL and had not received intensive chemotherapy at diagnosis for any reason. Biopsies of these cases were centrally reviewed, and the mutational pattern was determined using next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: These 15 patients had the classic clinical, biological and pathological features of TFHL, angioimmunoblastic-type. TET2 mutations were found in 83% of patients; RHOA G17V, IDH2 R172 and DNMT3A mutations were found in 67%, 42% and 33% of the patients, respectively. Among the 15 patients, 8 did not receive any treatment, and 7 received steroid-based treatment. Ten patients had progression (5 in each group). Four patients died (3 of them from the progression of their lymphoma). The median follow-up in our cohort was 53 months. The 5-year OS was 66%, 100% for untreated patients and 29% for the others. In those 2 groups, the median time to treatment initiation was 22 months from diagnosis. CONCLUSION: We described a series of 15 well-characterized TFHL patients with an indolent outcome, suggesting that a watch-and-wait approach can be proposed in selected patients. Identifying factors predicting such evolution is warranted