Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

To discuss challenges concerning treatment for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) and review complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies being evaluated for this condition, we performed a comprehensive search of articles published from 1990–2005 using the PubMed, Medline databases. Data from the articles were abstracted and pooled by subject. Keywords cross-searched with CP/CPPS included: complementary, alternative, integrative, therapies, interventions, nutrition, antioxidants, herbs, supplements, biofeedback and acupuncture. Listed articles with no abstracts were not included. Various CAM therapies for CP/CPPS exist including biofeedback, acupuncture, hyperthermia and electrostimulation. Additionally, a variety of in vitro and in vivo studies testing herbal and nutritional supplements were found. Saw palmetto, cernilton and quercetin were the most frequently tested supplements for CP/CPPS. Although many CAM therapies demonstrate positive preliminary observations as prospective treatments for CP/CPPS, further exploratory studies including more randomized, controlled trials are necessary for significant validation as treatment options for this complex disorder

A pilot study on acupuncture for lower urinary tract symptoms related to chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain

Background: The etiology and treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/ CPPS) remain poorly understood. Pain, lower urinary tract voiding symptoms and negative impact on quality of life (QOL) are the most common complaints. Acupuncture, which has been widely used to treat painful and chronic conditions, may be a potential treatment to alleviate the constellation of symptoms experienced by men with CP/CPPS. The purpose of our study was to assess the impact of standardized full body and auricular acupuncture in men refractory to conventional therapies and collect pilot data to warrant further randomized trials. Methods: Ten men diagnosed with category IIIA or IIIB CP/CPPS >6 months, refractory to at least 1 conventional therapy (antibiotics, anti-inflammatory agents, 5-α reductase inhibitors, α-1 blockers) and scoring >4 on the pain subset of the NIH-CPSI were prospectively analyzed in an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved, single-center clinical trial (Columbia University Medical Center IRB#AAAA-7460). Standardized full body and auricular acupuncture treatment was given twice weekly for 6 weeks. The primary endpoints were total score of the NIH-CPSI and assessment of serious adverse events. The secondary endpoints were individual scores of the NIH-CPSI and QOL questionnaire scores of the short-form 36 (SF-36). Results: The median age of the subjects was 36 years (range 29–63). Decreases in total NIH-CPSI scores (mean ± SD) after 3 and 6 weeks from baseline (25.1 ± 6.6) were 17.6 ± 5.7 (P < 0.006) and 8.8 ± 6.2 (P < 0.006) respectively and remained significant after an additional 6 weeks of follow-up (P < 0.006). Symptom and QOL/NIH-CPSI sub-scores were also significant (P < 0.002 and P < 0.002 respectively). Significance in 6 of 8 categories of the SF-36 including bodily pain (P < 0.002) was achieved. One regression in the SF-36 vitality category was observed after follow-up. There were no adverse events. Conclusion: The preliminary findings, although limited, suggest the potential therapeutic role of acupuncture in the treatment of CP/CPPS. Data from this and previous studies warrant randomized trials of acupuncture for CP/CPPS and particular attention towards acupuncture point selection, treatment intervention, and durability of acupuncture

A pilot study on acupuncture for lower urinary tract symptoms related to chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The etiology and treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) remain poorly understood. Pain, lower urinary tract voiding symptoms and negative impact on quality of life (QOL) are the most common complaints. Acupuncture, which has been widely used to treat painful and chronic conditions, may be a potential treatment to alleviate the constellation of symptoms experienced by men with CP/CPPS. The purpose of our study was to assess the impact of standardized full body and auricular acupuncture in men refractory to conventional therapies and collect pilot data to warrant further randomized trials.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Ten men diagnosed with category IIIA or IIIB CP/CPPS >6 months, refractory to at least 1 conventional therapy (antibiotics, anti-inflammatory agents, 5-α reductase inhibitors, α-1 blockers) and scoring >4 on the pain subset of the NIH-CPSI were prospectively analyzed in an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved, single-center clinical trial (Columbia University Medical Center IRB#AAAA-7460). Standardized full body and auricular acupuncture treatment was given twice weekly for 6 weeks. The primary endpoints were total score of the NIH-CPSI and assessment of serious adverse events. The secondary endpoints were individual scores of the NIH-CPSI and QOL questionnaire scores of the short-form 36 (SF-36).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The median age of the subjects was 36 years (range 29–63). Decreases in total NIH-CPSI scores (mean ± SD) after 3 and 6 weeks from baseline (25.1 ± 6.6) were 17.6 ± 5.7 (P < 0.006) and 8.8 ± 6.2 (P < 0.006) respectively and remained significant after an additional 6 weeks of follow-up (P < 0.006). Symptom and QOL/NIH-CPSI sub-scores were also significant (P < 0.002 and P < 0.002 respectively). Significance in 6 of 8 categories of the SF-36 including bodily pain (P < 0.002) was achieved. One regression in the SF-36 vitality category was observed after follow-up. There were no adverse events.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The preliminary findings, although limited, suggest the potential therapeutic role of acupuncture in the treatment of CP/CPPS. Data from this and previous studies warrant randomized trials of acupuncture for CP/CPPS and particular attention towards acupuncture point selection, treatment intervention, and durability of acupuncture.</p

A human- and male-specific protocadherin that acts through the wnt signaling pathway to induce neuroendocrine transdifferentiation of prostate cancer cells.

Protocadherin-PC (PCDH-PC) is a gene on the human Y chromosome that is selectively expressed in apoptosis- and hormone-resistant human prostate cancer cells. The protein encoded by PCDH-PC is cytoplasmically localized and has a small serine-rich domain in its COOH terminus that is homologous to the beta-catenin binding site of classical cadherins. Variants of prostate cancer cells that express PCDH-PC have high levels of nuclear beta-catenin protein and increased wnt-signaling. In this study, we show that transfection of human prostate cancer cells (LNCaP) with PCDH-PC or culture of these cells in androgen-free medium (a condition that up-regulates PCDH-PC expression) activates wnt signaling as assessed by nuclear accumulation of beta-catenin, increased expression of luciferase from a reporter vector promoted by Tcf binding elements and increased expression of wnt target genes. Moreover, LNCaP cells transfected with PCDH-PC or grown in androgen-free medium transdifferentiate to neuroendocrine-like cells marked by elevated expression of neuron-specific enolase and chromogranin-A. Neuroendocrine transdifferentiation was also observed when LNCaP cells were transfected by stabilized beta-catenin. Increased wnt signaling and neuroendocrine transdifferentiation of LNCaP cells induced by culture in androgen-free medium was suppressed by short interfering RNAs that target PCDH-PC as well as by dominant-negative Tcf or short interfering RNA against beta-catenin, supporting the hypothesis that increased expression of PCDH-PC is driving neuroendocrine transdifferentiation by activating wnt signaling. These findings have significant implications for the process through which prostate cancers progress to hormone resistance in humans

Network statistics and major hubs in consensus modules visualized in Fig 7.

<p>Only intra-module interactions are considered (N = 640). The three consecutive numbers in parentheses in rows 1 and 4 indicate the number of edges in the ‘positive dominant’, ‘negative dominant, and the ‘heterogeneous’ groups respectively. The two consecutive numbers in parentheses in row 2 denote the number of non-phosphospecific and phosphospecific antibodies respectively. The sum of antibody counts in row 2 (185) is one less than the number of unique antibodies in the discovery set because one antibody (14.3.3_zeta) has no intra-module interactions despite having multiple inter-module interactions (<a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004765#pcbi.1004765.s010" target="_blank">S1A Table</a>).</p

Network visualization of the six modules discovered in Fig 6.

<p>Only intra-module interactions are visualized. Each interaction is colored red, blue, or black based on membership in the positive dominant, negative dominant, or the heterogeneous groups respectively. The vertex colors are adopted from <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004765#pcbi.1004765.g006" target="_blank">Fig 6</a> and denote module number. Network statistics are provided in <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004765#pcbi.1004765.t003" target="_blank">Table 3</a>, and module membership information for all discovery set interactions is provided in <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004765#pcbi.1004765.s010" target="_blank">S1A Table</a>.</p

Principal component analysis and unsupervised clustering of 11 tumor types using consensus edge weights from the TOP6 methods.

<p>(<b>A</b>) Four major groups of tumor types can be observed in the PC1 vs. PC2 (left) and PC2 vs. PC3 (right) plots: 1) COAD, READ; 2) LUAD, LUSC, HNSC; 3) GBM, KIRC; 4) OV, BRCA, UCEC, BLCA. (<b>B</b>) Hierarchical clustering (Ward linkage and Euclidean distance) on consensus edge weights places tumor types into the same four groups on the dendrogram (left). The heat map on the right is constructed from the percentages of overlapping edges between tumor types. The order of tumor types in the heat map is taken from the dendrogram on the left.</p