The use of mobile phone while driving: Behavior and determinant analysis in one of the largest metropolitan area of Italy

The use of mobile phones while driving is one of the main causes of road accidents and it is a phenomenon in continuous growth. The key aim of this study is to analyse simultaneously knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward the use of mobile phones while driving in one of the largest and populous metropolitan areas of Italy, Naples. The data acquired from 774 questionnaires - administered to subjects evenly divided by gender and with an average age of 39 years - revealed that 69 % have used their mobile phone while driving at least once in their lifetime. Among those who used the phone, 63.6 % use it to make phone calls while 75.2 % only to answer them; 49.1 % read messages and only 33.3 % write them. It is also notable that 34.1 % do not stop to answer a call and only 10 % do not value the use of headsets while driving as fundamental. The results indicate that cell phone usage while driving is common in the study population, despite many having university-level education and satisfactory risks awareness. The multiple linear regression analysis shows how knowledge is not correlated to the behavior held. On the contrary, attitudes are strongly correlated to knowledge and behavior, meaning that good attitudes bring forth positive behavior. According to the collected data and statistical analysis, it is possible to identify factors that can greatly affect the use of mobile phone while driving and establish targeted prevention programs

Right ventricular ejection fraction measurement in moderate acute respiratory failure (ARF). Effects of PEEP

Eight patients mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure were submitted to increasing levels of PEEP, from 0 to 15 cm H2O. Right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) and end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVI) were measured using the fast response thermistor Swan-Ganz catheter. PEEP induced a linear decrease of cardiac index, while the pulmonary artery pressure increased. In three patients (group A) with a RVEDVI larger than 120 ml at ZEEP, RVEF decreased and RVEDVI increased with PEEP. In the other five patients (RVEDVI less than 120 ml, group B), RVEF was unchanged and RVEDVI decreased at PEEP 15 cm H2O. This study suggest that RV changes induced by PEEP are probably a function of the initial RVEF and RVEDVI