Decreased Frequency of the HLA-DRB1*11 Allele in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection

A genetically determined resistance or susceptibility to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may make an important contribution to the course of liver disease and may be linked to the human major histocompatibility complex (MHC). The aim of this study was to investigate the HLA class II genotype profile in chronic hepatitis C and to determine the HLA-hepatitis C association. The experimental population was composed of 49 unrelated chronic HCV patients (31 females, 18 males; mean age, 54.4 ± 1.7 years; range, 34 to 73 years). The control population consisted of 43 ethnically matched healthy donors. HLA-DR and -DQ alleles were studied for patients and controls by a PCR-sequence-specific-primer low-resolution method. Anti-HCV was investigated with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay II, and HCV RNA was investigated with reverse transcriptase nested PCR. The HLA class II allele, DRB1*11, was found at reduced frequency in 49 patients with chronic hepatitis C (anti-HCV and HCV RNA positive) compared to that for controls (22.4 versus 51.0%; P < 0.01, odds ratio = 0.3, confidence interval = 0.1 to 0.7). No further HLA associations with chronic HCV infection were observed, and there was no correlation between the stage of disease and HLA. DRB1*11 was also found at reduced frequency in all HCV antibody-positive patients compared to controls (corrected P = not significant). DRB1*11 was associated with chronic HCV infection, and it is possible that HLA-DRB1*11 may have a protective feature in chronic HCV infection. In addition, DRB1*11 was associated with protection from HCV infection. These findings suggest that host HLA class II genotype is an important factor determining the outcome of infection with HCV

Comparative evaluation of the microplate nitrate reductase assay and the rezasurin microtitre assay for the rapid detection of multidrug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates

The microplate nitrate reductase assay (MNRA) and the rezasurin microtitre assay (REMA) were used for the susceptibility testing of 73 clinical isolates and the results were compared with those that were obtained using the Bactec 460 TB and Bactec MGIT 960 systems. The REMA and the MNRA were performed in 96-well plates. For the REMA, the concentrations of isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF) ranged from 1.0-0.01 mu g/mL and 2.0-0.03 mu g/mL, respectively. For the MNRA, the INH concentration was between 1.0-0.03 mu g/mL and the RIF concentration was between 2.0-0.06 mu g/mL. For the MNRA, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and INH/RIF agreement were 100/95.6, 97.6/100, 96.8/100, 100/98 and 98.6/98.6, respectively, and for the REMA, they were 100/91.3, 90.4/100, 88.5/100, 100/96.1 and 94.5/97.2, respectively. Our data suggest that these two rapid, low-cost methods may be inexpensive, alternative assays for the rapid detection of multidrug resistant tuberculosis in low-income countries

Comparison of the Proportion Method With Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube and E-test for Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between proportion method with mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) and E-test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Forty clinical isolates were tested. MGIT and E-test with the first line antituberculous drugs correlated with the proportion method. Our results suggested that MGIT and E-test methods can be routinely used instead of the proportion method

EFFECT OF LINEZOLID IN COMBINATION WITH ISONIAZID AND RIFAMPICIN AGAINST MULTIDRUG RESISTANT MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS CLINICAL ISOLATES

Tuberculosis continues to be a serious public health problem worldwide. Since multi-drug resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis constitutes a serious problem in tuberculosis control, new and more effective chemotherapeutic agents are required. This study was aimed to investigate the in vitro effect of linezolid alone and in combination with isoniazid and rifampicin against 10 multidrug resistant M.tuberculosis isolates by using the checkerboard method. Checkerboard testing was performed by the broth microdilution method, using Middlebrook 7H9 broth with 10% oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase. Antibiotic combinations were tested at concentrations of 0.06-4 mu g/ml for linezolid and 0.03-32 mg/ml for isoniazid and rifampicin. The results were evaluated according to the calculated fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index. All clinical isolates were found to be susceptible to linezolid; MICs of linezolid were 0.25 mu g/ml for two strains and 0.5 mu g/ml for the other strains. While rifampicin MIC values were > 32 mu g/ml for all the isolates, isoniazid MIC values were 4 mu g/ml for two isolates, 8 mu g/ml for six isolates, 16 mu g/ml for one isolate and 32 mu g/ml for one isolate. In this study, synergism was detected in only one strain between linezolid and isoniazid (FIC index: 0.265). Although synergy was observed between linezolid and isoniazid just for one strain, further larger scale in vitro and in vivo studies are necessary to evaluate the effect of different drug combinations against multidrug-resistant M.tuberculosis strains

Comparative evaluation of the microplate nitrate reductase assay and the rezasurin microtitre assay for the rapid detection of multidrug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates

The microplate nitrate reductase assay (MNRA) and the rezasurin microtitre assay (REMA) were used for the susceptibility testing of 73 clinical isolates and the results were compared with those that were obtained using the Bactec 460 TB and Bactec MGIT 960 systems. The REMA and the MNRA were performed in 96-well plates. For the REMA, the concentrations of isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF) ranged from 1.0-0.01 µg/mL and 2.0-0.03 µg/mL, respectively. For the MNRA, the INH concentration was between 1.0-0.03 µg/mL and the RIF concentration was between 2.0-0.06 µg/mL. For the MNRA, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and INH/RIF agreement were 100/95.6, 97.6/100, 96.8/100, 100/98 and 98.6/98.6, respectively, and for the REMA, they were 100/91.3, 90.4/100, 88.5/100, 100/96.1 and 94.5/97.2, respectively. Our data suggest that these two rapid, low-cost methods may be inexpensive, alternative assays for the rapid detection of multidrug resistant tuberculosis in low-income countries

SHORT COMMUNICATION - Comparison of the Proportion Method With Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube and E-test for Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between proportion method with mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) and E-test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis   . Forty clinical isolates were tested. MGIT and E-test with the first line antituberculous drugs correlated with the proportion method. Our results suggested that MGIT and E-test methods can be routinely used instead of the proportion method

Evaluation of four colourimetric susceptibility tests for the rapid detection of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates

The purpose of this study is to evaluate four rapid colourimetric methods, including the resazurin microtitre assay (REMA), malachite green decolourisation assay (MGDA), microplate nitrate reductase assay (MNRA) and crystal violet decolourisation assay (CVDA), for the rapid detection of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis. Fifty Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates were used in this study. Eighteen isolates were MDR, two isolates were only resistant to isoniazid (INH) and the remaining isolates were susceptible to both INH and rifampicin (RIF). INH and RIF were tested in 0.25 µg/mL and 0.5 µg/mL, respectively. The agar proportion method was used as a reference method. MNRA and REMA were performed with some modifications. MGDA and CVDA were performed as defined in the literature. The agreements of the MNRA for INH and RIF were 96% and 94%, respectively, while the agreement of the other assays for INH and RIF were 98%. In this study, while the specificities of the REMA, MGDA and CVDA were 100%, the specificity of the MNRA was lower than the others (93.3% for INH and 90.9% for RIF). In addition, while the sensitivity of the MNRA was 100%, the sensitivities of the others were lower than that of the MNRA (from 94.1-95%). The results were reported on the seventh-10th day of the incubation. All methods are reliable, easy to perform, inexpensive and easy to evaluate and do not require special equipment