“Handing out non-prescribed antibiotics is storing up trouble for the next generation!” Unpacking multistakeholder views of drivers and potential solutions in Ethiopia

Abstract Background Antibiotic resistance is a global health crisis, with inappropriate antibiotic use often being linked to non-prescribed antibiotic dispensing practices. This study aimed to examine the perspectives of multiple stakeholders on the drivers and potential solutions for non-prescribed antibiotic dispensing in Ethiopian community drug retail outlets (CDROs). Despite the prescription only use policies, the practice remains prevalent in Ethiopia. Many factors are thought to contribute to this issue, although little research is available for non-urban settings. Methods A phenomenological qualitative study was conducted. Pharmacy professionals (owners or employees) working in non-urban towns CDROs were selected through a simulated client study, which identified CDROs that had dispensed antibiotics without a prescription. Some high-level decision makers in the Ethiopian health system were also purposively selected. Interviews were conducted in-person and over the phone or via Zoom. The interview data were transcribed verbatim, translated to English, and thematically analysed. NVivo 12 software was used to assist with coding. Results CDRO pharmacy professionals (n = 18) and five decision makers were interviewed. Most professionals (61%) were pharmacists working in drug stores, with one to 11 years of work experience. Several contributing factors were identified at the level of patients, CDRO staff, and the healthcare system. These included economic interests, inadequate knowledge and inappropriate attitudes about antibiotic use or supply, and issues within the healthcare system included inaccessibility and insufficient capacity, absence of or a weak enforcement of prescription-only regulations or service supervision. Additionally, patient-related factors included a lack of knowledge and inappropriate attitudes about antibiotics use and their supply, previous successful treatment experience and a culture of seeking out antibiotics. Conclusions A complex set of modifiable factors related to patients, CDRO staff and healthcare system were identified that contribute to the non-prescribed supply of antibiotics. Due to this complexity, a single solution will not resolve the issues. Therefore, a range of multifaceted solutions have been suggested, including stricter regulation, increasing availability and accessibility of healthcare services, collaboration, and local consensus-building among CDROs, regular training for CDRO staff, and using community social events to educate the public about responsible use of antibiotics

The impact of pharmacist-led medication therapy management on medication adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled study

Background: Poor adherence to antidiabetic medications leads to a higher rate of hospital admissions and adverse health outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.Objective: This study aims to evaluate whether a pharmacist-led medication therapy management, compared to the usual care, could enhance medication adherence and reduce hospital admission in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from February 1 to July 30, 2016. Patients in the control group (n=65) received the usual care while patients in the intervention group (n=62) received a personalized pharmacotherapeutic care plan and diabetes education. The two groups were compared by repeated measure ANOVA at 3 and 6‐months with medication adherence (using Morisky medication adherence scale) and number of hospital admissions as the main outcome variables.Results: A total of 127 patients were included in the study. A marked and statistically significant increase in medication adherence from baseline to 3 and 6 months were noted in the intervention group (increased from 9.2% at baseline to 61% at 6 month) compared with the control group (increased from 13.2% at baseline (to 30.2% at 6 month; p-value<0.01). Furthermore, at the 6-month follow-up, only 23 patients in MTM group with poorly controlled blood glucose levels resulted in hospital admissions compared to 48 patients in non-MTM group, resulting in a 52.1% fewer hospital admissions (p< 0.001).Conclusions: The findings of this study implied that pharmacist-led medication therapy management might improve medication adherence and reduce number of hospitalizations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Hence, policies and guidelines should be in place in order for clinical pharmacists to fully engage in patient care and improve the medication therapy outcomes

The impact of pharmacist-led medication therapy management on medication adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled study

Background: Poor adherence to antidiabetic medications leads to a higher rate of hospital admissions and adverse health outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Objective: This study aims to evaluate whether a pharmacist-led medication therapy management, compared to the usual care, could enhance medication adherence and reduce hospital admission in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from February 1 to July 30, 2016. Patients in the control group (n=65) received the usual care while patients in the intervention group (n=62) received a personalized pharmacotherapeutic care plan and diabetes education. The two groups were compared by repeated measure ANOVA at 3 and 6‐months with medication adherence (using Morisky medication adherence scale) and number of hospital admissions as the main outcome variables. Results: A total of 127 patients were included in the study. A marked and statistically significant increase in medication adherence from baseline to 3 and 6 months were noted in the intervention group (increased from 9.2% at baseline to 61% at 6 month) compared with the control group (increased from 13.2% at baseline (to 30.2% at 6 month; p-valu

When fear and misinformation go viral: Pharmacists' role in deterring medication misinformation during the 'infodemic' surrounding COVID-19

The world has faced an unprecedented challenge when coronavirus (COVID-19) emerged as a pandemic. Millions of people have contracted the virus and a significant number of them lost their lives, resulting in a tremendous social and economic shock across the globe. Amid the growing burden of the pandemic, there are parallel emergencies that need to be simultaneously tackled: the proliferation of fake medicines, fake news and medication misinformation surrounding COVID-19. Pharmacists are key health professionals with the required skills and training to contribute to the fight against these emergencies. Primarily, they can be a relevant source of accurate and reliable information to the public or other fellow health professionals thereby reducing the spread of COVID-19 medication misinformation. This can be achieved by providing accurate and reliable information based on recommendations given by relevant health authorities and professional associations to make sure the community understand the importance of the message and thus minimise the detrimental consequences of the pandemic. This commentary aims to summarise the existing literature in relation to the promising treatments currently under trial, the perils of falsified medications and medicine-related information and the role of pharmacists in taking a leading role in combating these parallel global emergencies