Outcome of intracranial bleeding managed with prothrombin complex concentrate in patients on direct factor Xa inhibitors or vitamin K antagonists

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is the most feared complication of anticoagulation with a high mortality and morbidity. Before registration of a specific reversal agent for factor Xa inhibitors (FXa-I), international guidelines recommended prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), which also is the specific reversal agent for vitamin K antagonists (VKA). In two contemporary cohorts, we compared clinical outcomes between patients with FXa-I and VKA related ICH treated with PCC between 2014 and 2018. Primary outcome was effective hemostasis after 24 h, according to the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis definition. Safety outcomes were defined as venous and arterial thromboembolic complications and death within 30 days. Thirty-six patients with FXa-I-ICH and 39 patients with VKA-ICH were available for analysis. Baseline characteristics were comparable between both groups, except for time from start of symptoms to presentation at the hospital. In the FXa-I-ICH cohort, 24 (73%) patients achieved effective hemostasis compared to 23 (62%) patients in the VKA-ICH cohort (crude odds ratio [OR] 1.62 [95%CI 0.59–4.48], adjusted OR 1.45 [95%CI 0.44–4.83]). Eight (24%) patients with FXa-I-ICH deceased compared to 17 (45%) patients with VKA-ICH (crude OR 0.38 [95%CI 0.14–1.24], adjusted OR 0.41 [95%CI 0.12–1.24]). In this observational cohort study, the outcome of ICH managed with PCC was similar in patients with FXa-I-ICH and in patients with VKA-ICH

Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Special Populations with Direct Oral Anticoagulants

As a result of the successful completion of their respective phase III studies compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been approved for the treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). These DOACs-apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban-have subsequently seen a steady uptake among clinicians since their approval. Despite the suitability of DOACs for a broad range of patients, they are not appropriate in certain situations, whereas in others they require additional considerations such as dose reductions. Subanalyses of phase III trials and studies on specific VTE patient populations have been conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the DOACs in a broad range of settings, such as patients with renal impairment, patients with cancer, patients of childbearing potential, patients with multiple comorbidities and pediatric patients. Furthermore, many recent guidance documents from important hematological societies and other specialists have incorporated several of these developments. These documents also identify the patients for whom DOACs are not suitable and where traditional anticoagulation options such as heparins or VKAs should be considered instead. This review provides an overview of key VTE patient subgroups, the clinical evidence supporting the use of anticoagulation in these patients, and a discussion of the most appropriate approaches to their management, including considerations such as dosing, acute and extended treatment durations, and DOAC selection

Effect of polypharmacy on bleeding with rivaroxaban versus vitamin K antagonist for treatment of venous thromboembolism

Background Polypharmacy, including use of inhibitors of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), is common in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and is associated with increased bleeding. Methods In 8246 patients included in the EINSTEIN-VTE studies for acute VTE, we evaluated the effect of polypharmacy on bleeding and on the relative differences between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonist (VKA). We assessed the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding) by number of comedications (none, 1-3, >= 4) at baseline, and by use of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inhibitors. Interaction between rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin/VKA and comedication was assessed by Cox regression analysis with p(interaction) estimates. Results With increasing number of comedications, the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding rose from 5.7% to 13.3% in rivaroxaban recipients and from 9.1% to 11.1% in enoxaparin/VKA recipients. Whereas rivaroxaban was associated with a reduced bleeding risk compared with enoxaparin/VKA in patients without comedication (hazard ratio [HR] 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-0.9), the risk was similar in patients with >= 4 comedications (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.97-1.5, p(interaction) .002). Use of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inhibitors was associated with a doubled bleeding risk compared with no use, without a difference between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin/VKA. Conclusion We conclude that fixed-dose rivaroxaban as compared with enoxaparin followed by dose-adjusted VKA is not associated with an increased bleeding risk in patients with VTE administered polypharmacy in general and CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inhibitors specifically. This implies that the observed increased bleeding risks with polypharmacy and use of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inhibitors are likely explained by comorbidities and frailty, and not by pharmacokinetic interactions

Effect of polypharmacy on bleeding with rivaroxaban versus vitamin K antagonist for treatment of venous thromboembolism

Background: Polypharmacy, including use of inhibitors of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), is common in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and is associated with increased bleeding. Methods: In 8246 patients included in the EINSTEIN-VTE studies for acute VTE, we evaluated the effect of polypharmacy on bleeding and on the relative differences between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonist (VKA). We assessed the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding) by number of comedications (none, 1–3, ≥4) at baseline, and by use of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inhibitors. Interaction between rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin/VKA and comedication was assessed by Cox regression analysis with pinteraction estimates. Results: With increasing number of comedications, the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding rose from 5.7% to 13.3% in rivaroxaban recipients and from 9.1% to 11.1% in enoxaparin/VKA recipients. Whereas rivaroxaban was associated with a reduced bleeding risk compared with enoxaparin/VKA in patients without comedication (hazard ratio [HR] 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4–0.9), the risk was similar in patients with ≥4 comedications (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.97–1.5, pinteraction.002). Use of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inhibitors was associated with a doubled bleeding risk compared with no use, without a difference between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin/VKA. Conclusion: We conclude that fixed-dose rivaroxaban as compared with enoxaparin followed by dose-adjusted VKA is not associated with an increased bleeding risk in patients with VTE administered polypharmacy in general and CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inhibitors specifically. This implies that the observed increased bleeding risks with polypharmacy and use of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inhibitors are likely explained by comorbidities and frailty, and not by pharmacokinetic interactions

Clinical characteristics of patients with direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) levels outside expected ranges:A retrospective chart study

Background: Routine monitoring direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is not recommended, yet DOAC levels are frequently measured in clinical practice. Interpretation of levels, especially those outside expected ranges, is challenging. Until now it's unclear which patients are at risk for these levels. Aim: Identify clinical characteristics of patients with DOAC levels outside expected ranges. Methods: Patients of 2 Dutch academic medical centers with a DOAC concentration measured between 2012 and 2019 were included. DOAC levels above upper limit peak and below lower limit trough ranges, based on DOAC registration trials, were assigned outside expected range. Differences between patients were evaluated using Chi-square, independent sample-T tests and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Of 597 patients with DOAC measurement, 108 (18.1%) had levels outside expected ranges. Compared to patients with levels within range, patients with levels above range (n = 64) were older (71.1 vs. 60.6 years), more often had creatinine clearance <50 ml/min (32.8% vs. 13.9%). and used more often interacting (17.2% vs. 6.7%) and/or antiplatelet co-medication (25.0% vs. 13.1%). Patients with levels above (62.5%) and below range (61.4%) more often had atrial fibrillation as DOAC indication versus patients with levels within range (39.1%). Age (OR 1.046 [1.025–1.068]) was associated with levels above range, while dabigatran versus apixaban was associated with levels below range (OR 6.060 [1.836–19.996]). Conclusion: Particularly older aged patients with additional comorbidity and co-medication had DOAC levels outside expected ranges. Prospective studies are essential to investigate whether identification of patients with levels outside expected ranges is necessary to reduce the risk of clinically relevant adverse events

Emergencies on direct oral anticoagulants: Management, outcomes, and laboratory effects of prothrombin complex concentrate

Background In the initial absence of specific reversal agents for factor Xa inhibitors (FXa-Is), prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) as a hemostatic agent has been recommended by guidelines. Since 2017, idarucizumab has been registered for dabigatran reversal. Still, data on the clinical outcome of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-related emergencies (major bleeding or urgent interventions) is scarce. In addition, it is unknown to what extent PCC restores thrombin generation in FXa-I-related emergencies. Our aim was to describe management and clinical outcomes of DOAC-related emergencies and to assess the laboratory effect of PCC in patients with FXa-I emergencies. Methods In this prospective cohort study in 5 Dutch hospitals, patients presenting with DOAC-related emergencies were eligible. The primary outcome was effective hemostasis according to the ISTH definition. Safety outcomes were 30-day mortality and thromboembolic rate. In patients treated with PCC, additional blood samples were taken to assess the effect on thrombin generation. Results We included 101 patients with major bleeding (FXa-I, 76; dabigatran, 25) and 21 patients requiring an urgent intervention (FXa-I, 16; dabigatran, 5). Of patients with major bleeding, 67% were treated with PCC or idarucizumab. Effective hemostasis, 30-day mortality, and thromboembolism rate were 67%, 22%, and 1%, respectively. In a subset of bleeding patients on FXa-I managed with PCC, thrombin generation increased, with 96% immediately after PCC administration. In patients requiring an urgent intervention, effective hemostasis, 30-day mortality, and thromboembolic rate were 95%, 14%, and 5%. Conclusions Effective hemostasis was achieved in the majority of patients presenting with DOAC-related emergencies;, thromboembolic complications were rare, and mortality was quite high