17 research outputs found
Cognitive-behavioral intervention for distress in patients with melanoma
BACKGROUND Melanoma accounts for > 79% of skin cancer-related deaths, although it accounts for only 4% of skin cancer incidence. Given the potential for lethality, it is likely that patients with melanoma may experience significant emotional distress. The current study was designed to determine the effect of a cognitive-behavioral intervention on distress and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with melanoma who had medium-to-high distress. METHODS Forty-eight patients who had Global Severity Index scores ≥ 60 2 months after their initial visit to the multidisciplinary melanoma clinic were randomized to receive either standard care or 4 sessions of a cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBI). Repeated assessments using the Brief Symptom Inventory, the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory occurred at baseline, at 2 months, and at 6 months after intervention for both groups. RESULTS An intent-to-treat analysis did not reveal significantly lower distress in the CBI group at 2 months or 6 months of follow-up, although differences were noted in anxiety and HRQOL. An effect-of-intervention analysis did reveal lower levels of distress in the CBI group at 2 months, with differences approaching significance at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS The four-session CBI significantly reduced distress and improved HRQOL for a period of 2 months in patients with melanoma who had medium-to-high distress, with improved general health evident 6 months after the intervention. Some variation in results was revealed in an intent-to-treat analysis. The initial evidence from the current study showed that a brief intervention may be effective for creating change in individuals with cancer who have increased distress, although further research is needed to identify the most optimal approach for delivering the intervention. Cancer 2003;98:854–64. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11579Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/34378/1/11579_ftp.pd
A phase II study of sequential 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) and paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer (Protocol PV BC 97/01)
Sequential administration of the association of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) and paclitaxel could be better tolerated than the association of an anthracycline and paclitaxel while having a similar antitumour effect. 69 patients with advanced breast cancer previously untreated with anthracyclines or paclitaxel entered a phase II multicentre study in which FEC was followed by paclitaxel. Both regimens were administered 4 times every 21 days. The median follow-up is 20 months and 38/69 patients have died. Grade III–IV toxicity was acceptable. Leukopenia occurred in 26% of patients, thrombocytopenia in 2% and anaemia in 4%. One patient had reversible heart failure during FEC therapy. Peripheral neuropathy and arthralgia-myalgia occurred in 9% and 4% of patients, respectively and one patient had respiratory hypersensitivity during paclitaxel treatment. 9 patients did not complete therapy because of: treatment refusal (n= 1), cardiac toxicity (n= 1), early death during FEC chemotherapy (n= 1), major protocol violations (n= 4), hypersensitivity reaction (n= 1) and early death during paclitaxel chemotherapy (n= 1). The overall response rate was 65% (95% CI = 53–76), and 7% of patients had stable disease. Therapy was defined as having failed in 28% of patients because they were not evaluable (13%) or had progressive disease (15%). The median time to progression and survival are 13.2 and 23.5 months, respectively. Sequential FEC-paclitaxel is a suitable strategy for patients with metastatic breast cancer who have not been previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes. In fact, it avoids major haematologic toxicity and has a good antitumour effect. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.co
Phase II study of gemcitabine and vindesine in patients with previously untreated non-resectable non-small-cell lung cancer
Because both vindesine and gemcitabine are active drugs in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with different modes of action and only partly overlapping toxicity, a phase II study was performed. Gemcitabine 1000 mg m−2 was given on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks, while vindesine 3 mg m−2 was administered weekly for 7 weeks, then every 2 weeks. A total of 42 patients with nonresectable NSCLC were included. The median age of patients was 56 years; 57% were men, 52% had adenocarcinoma, 31% squamous cell carcinoma and 17% had large-cell carcinoma. The performance status ranged from 0 to 2 with 83% in performance status 1. The majority (55%) had stage IV disease, while 40% had stage III B and 5% stage III A disease. WHO grade 3–4 leucopenia occurred in five patients (12%) and 9% had grade 4 neutropenia. Thrombocytopenia grade 3–4 was observed in six patients (15%). There were no septic death or bleeding episodes. One patient had a transient WHO grade 4 increase in bilirubin, and four patients had a decrease in glomerular filtration rate below the normal limit; one of these patients developed a non-reversible renal insufficiency. Ten patients (24%) complained of dyspnoea of uncertain mechanism, possibly involving bronchoconstriction. There were one complete and seven partial responses among 40 assessable patients (20%, 95% confidence limits 9–36%). Median response duration was 31 weeks (range 11–83 weeks) and median survival time 31 weeks (range 2–171 weeks). The current combination of gemcitabine and vindesine does not appear to be promising for further examination because of the toxicity and somewhat disappointing activity. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaig
Avaliação da qualidade de vida em pacientes laringectomizados: uma revisão sistemática
A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care: preliminary psychometric analysis in French, Polish, Swedish and Italian oncology patients
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe
Preoperative radiation therapy and surgery in the treatment of "bulky" squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix (stage Ib, IIa, and IIb operable tumors)
Forty-two women with "bulky" squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix, larger than 5 cm, were treated between 1982 and 1988. The median follow-up was 5 years (from 37 to 106 months). The age range was from 25 to 77 years (mean: 49). There were 14 stage Ib, 5 stage IIa, and 23 stage IIb operable patients. Forty grays were delivered at mid-plane of the pelvis (23 fractions in 31 days) using the four-field technique (6-18 MV). External beam radiation therapy was followed by 20 Gy of intracavitary radiation therapy. Forty-eight days later total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH-BSO) and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy were performed. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival was 83 and 81%, respectively. The 5-year locoregional control rate was 83%. Thirteen patients suffered from mild to severe complications (31%) but there were only two long-term (5%) complications