Comparison of efficacy in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab who did or did not discontinue treatment due to immune-related adverse events:A real-world data study

SIMPLE SUMMARY: This retrospective study of real-world patients with metastatic melanoma shows that discontinuing treatment with combination immunotherapy due to adverse events does not result in a poorer outcome compared to patients that did not discontinue due to toxicity. This is important knowledge for clinicians and patients, as discontinuing treatment may cause great anxiety for patients because they believe that it may limit the response. ABSTRACT: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are very prevalent when treating patients with ipilimumab and nivolumab in combination, and 30–40% of patients discontinue the treatment for this reason. It is of high clinical relevance to investigate the consequences of discontinuing the treatment early since combination therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab is the first line of treatment for many patients with metastatic melanoma. In this follow-up study, with real-world data from the nationwide DAMMED database, we investigated whether there was a difference in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients who discontinued or did not discontinue treatment within the first four doses of treatment due to irAEs. In total, 448 patients were treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab. Of these, 133 patients discontinued due to irAEs in the induction phase. Using the Cox proportional hazards model, there was no significant difference in PFS when comparing the group that discontinued with the group that did not discontinue. The group that discontinued had a significantly longer OS than the group that received the full length of treatment. Therefore, we conclude that there is no significant negative impact on efficacy for patients who discontinue due to irAEs in the induction phase of combination immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma

Five-Year Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

945 patients with inoperable stage III or stage IV melanoma were randomised to ipilimumab plus nivolumab (ipi/nivo)(314), nivolumab (nivo) (316) or ipilimumab (Ipilimumab) (315). The minimum follow up from randomisation of the last patient was 60 months. Objective responses were seen in 58% of Ipilimumab/nivo, 45% of nivo and 19% of Ipilimumab patients. Complete responses were seen in 22% (Ipilimumab/nivo), 19% (nivo) and 6% (Ipi) patients. Overall survival (OS) at five years was 52% (Ipilimumab/nivo), 44% (nivo) and 26% (Ipi). In patients with and without bras mutations the OS at five years was 60 & 48% (Ipilimumab/nivo), 46 & 43% (nivo) and 30 & 25% (Ipi) respectively. OS curves were flat beyond three years indicating that these treatments lead to sustained long term survival of these patients

Safety and efficacy of nintedanib as second-line therapy for patients with differentiated or medullary thyroid cancer progressing after first-line therapy. A randomized phase II study of the EORTC Endocrine Task Force (protocol 1209-EnTF)

BackgroundNintedanib is a triple-angiokinase inhibitor with potential activity in patients with advanced thyroid cancers, as radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR DTC) and medullary thyroid cancer (MTC).DesignEORTC-1209 (NCT01788982) was a double-blind randomized (2:1 ratio) placebo-controlled phase II, multi-cohort study exploring the efficacy and safety of nintedanib in patients with progressive, locally advanced, and/or metastatic RAIR DTC and MTC. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the per-protocol (PP) population for both cohorts. Secondary endpoints included response rate, duration of response, overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsRAIR DTC cohort: Seventy out of the 75 planned patients with RAIR DTC (median age, 66 years; 39 women) who had progressed after one (76%) or two lines (24%) of previous systemic therapy were randomized to receive either nintedanib (N = 45) or placebo (N = 25). Of these, 69 patients started treatment and 56 met all inclusion criteria (PP). At data cutoff, the median duration of follow-up was 26.3 months in the nintedanib arm and 19.8 months in the placebo arm. In the PP population, the median PFS was 3.7 months [80% confidence interval (CI), 1.9–6.5] in the nintedanib arm and 2.9 months (80% CI, 2.0–5.6) in the placebo arm (HR = 0.65; 80% CI, 0.42–0.99; one-sided log-rank test P = 0.0947). No objective response was observed. The median OS was 29.6 months [80% CI, 15.2–not reached (NR)] in the nintedanib arm and not reached in the placebo arm. Grade 3–4 adverse events of any attribution occurred in 50% of patients receiving nintedanib and in 36% of patients receiving placebo. MTC cohort: Thirty-one out of the 67 planned patients with MTC (median age, 57 years; eight women) who had progressed after one (68%) or two (32%) lines of previous systemic therapy were randomized to receive either nintedanib (N = 22) or placebo (N = 9). Of these, 20 patients (15 in the nintedanib arm and five in the placebo arm) started treatment and met all inclusion criteria (PP). The median PFS was 7.0 months (80% CI, 1.9–8.7) in the nintedanib arm and 3.9 months (80% CI, 3.0–5.5) in the placebo arm (HR = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.16–1.53). No objective response was reported. The median OS was 16.4 months (80% CI, 12.1–24.9) in the nintedanib arm and 12.3 months (80% CI, 7.1–NR) in the placebo arm. Grade 3–4 adverse events of any attribution during the blinded period occurred in 59.1% of patients receiving nintedanib and in 33.3% of patients receiving placebo.ConclusionThis study did not suggest a clinically significant improvement of PFS with nintedanib over placebo in patients with pretreated RAIR DTC and MTC

A prospective phase II trial exploring the association between tumor microenvironment biomarkers and clinical activity of ipilimumab in advanced melanoma

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Ipilimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, has demonstrated an improvement in overall survival in two phase III trials of patients with advanced melanoma. The primary objective of the current trial was to prospectively explore candidate biomarkers from the tumor microenvironment for associations with clinical response to ipilimumab.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In this randomized, double-blind, phase II biomarker study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00261365), 82 pretreated or treatment-naïve patients with unresectable stage III/IV melanoma were induced with 3 or 10 mg/kg ipilimumab every 3 weeks for 4 doses; at Week 24, patients could receive maintenance doses every 12 weeks. Efficacy was evaluated per modified World Health Organization response criteria and safety was assessed continuously. Candidate biomarkers were evaluated in tumor biopsies collected pretreatment and 24 to 72 hours after the second ipilimumab dose. Polymorphisms in immune-related genes were also evaluated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Objective response rate, response patterns, and safety were consistent with previous trials of ipilimumab in melanoma. No associations between genetic polymorphisms and clinical activity were observed. Immunohistochemistry and histology on tumor biopsies revealed significant associations between clinical activity and high baseline expression of FoxP3 (p = 0.014) and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (p = 0.012), and between clinical activity and increase in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) between baseline and 3 weeks after start of treatment (p = 0.005). Microarray analysis of mRNA from tumor samples taken pretreatment and post-treatment demonstrated significant increases in expression of several immune-related genes, and decreases in expression of genes implicated in cancer and melanoma.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Baseline expression of immune-related tumor biomarkers and a post-treatment increase in TILs may be positively associated with ipilimumab clinical activity. The observed pharmacodynamic changes in gene expression warrant further analysis to determine whether treatment-emergent changes in gene expression may be associated with clinical efficacy. Further studies are required to determine the predictive value of these and other potential biomarkers associated with clinical response to ipilimumab.</p

PD-L1 is a biomarker of real-world clinical outcomes for anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-1 monotherapy in metastatic melanoma

Background: Metastatic melanoma (MM) is commonly treated with a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab, regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression. Methods: We conducted a population-based study including all patients with MM (except ocular melanoma) treated in Denmark with first-line combination therapy or anti-PD-1 monotherapy since January 2017. Baseline data including known prognostic characteristics were used in multivariable and propensity-matched score (PMS) analyses to assess progression-free survival (PFS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS), and overall survival (OS) according to PD-L1 expression. Results: We identified 1341 eligible patients, with known PD-L1 status for 1081 patients (43% PD-L1 ≥ 1%, 57% PD-L1 &lt; 1%). PD-L1 ≥ 1% was an independent positive prognostic biomarker for survival in the overall cohort (MSS: HR 0.66, CI 0.52–0.83, p &lt; 0.001). In the PMS PD-L1 ≥ 1% cohort, combination therapy showed similar clinical outcomes to monotherapy (PFS: HR 1.41, CI 0.94–2.11, p = 0.101; MSS: HR 1.21, CI 0.70–2.11, p = 0.49; OS: HR 1.17, CI 0.68–2.00, p = 0.567). In contrast, in the PMS PD-L1 &lt; 1% and in the PMS PD-L1 &lt; 1% BRAF WT cohorts, combination therapy improved PFS (respectively with HR 0.70, CI 0.53–0.93, p = 0.013; and HR 0.54, CI 0.37–0.78, p = 0.001), but did not reach statistically significant improvements of MSS (HR 0.72, CI 0.50–1.02, p = 0.065; and HR 0.79, CI 0.51–1.21, p = 0.278) or OS (HR 0.78, CI 0.56–1.08, p = 0.135; and HR 0.81, CI 0.54–1.21, p = 0.305) compared to monotherapy. Conclusion: Our findings support previous exploratory analyses of Checkmate-067, highlighting that improved clinical outcomes with combination therapy are not established in unselected patients with high (≥1%) tumor PD-L1 expression.</p