EVALUATION OF PCR AND ELISA-IgM RESULTS IN THE LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF CRIMEAN-CONGO HAEMORRHAGIC FEVER CASES IN 2008 IN TURKEY

Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a fatal zoonotic viral haemorrhagic infection described in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, and the Middle East. CCHF virus (CCHFV) classified in Bunyaviridae family and Nairovirus genus, is transmitted to humans by tick (Hyalomma and Ixodid) bites and human to human transmission may occur by direct contact with blood or other infected tissues. The disease became endemic and a public health problem since 2002 outbreak in Turkey. The specific laboratory diagnosis and confirmation of the disease is performed in Refik Saydam National Public Health Agency, by using molecular and serological methods. For this purpose serum and/or plasma samples from suspected CCHF patients are submitted to the reference laboratory with an official "possible case report form". According to the algorithm in our laboratory, the first samples which were sent from possible acute cases were searched initially by an in-house real time-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method and those which were found negative with PCR, were then studied by in-house ELISA method in terms of CCHF-IgM antibodies. In 2008, a total of 4634 samples obtained from 2855 CCHF suspected patients have been examined for the positivity of CCHFV, and 1315 (46%) cases were found to be positive by molecular and/or serologic methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of 726 cases whose at least 2 samples were sent to laboratory, with at least 1 positivity in at least 1 clinical sample with either PCR or IgM ELISA, or both, and with complete informations in possible case report form, during 2008 in Turkey. The positive results were also analyzed according to the starting date of the complaints and the date samples received in order to evaluate the positivity rates of molecular and serological methods with regard to the time. The first serum samples in 94.1% (683/726) of cases were found to be positive with PCR and/or ELISA-IgM methods. PCR positivity was found as 78.1% (5671726), while CCHFV-IgM positivity was detected in 116 (72.9%) in the remaining 159 PCR negative samples. In the first sera, PCR and ELISA results were evaluated in relation to the start of complaints and the date samples received. After the onset of symptoms, PCR positivity was determined as 83.4% in the samples taken in the first 5 days, and reduces to 67.5% in the samples between 6-10 days. The detection rate of CCHFV-IgM increases up to 95% when PCR positivity rate decreases after the 5(th) day. As expected, positivity is determined to be high by PCR in the first days, and ELISA-IgM after the 5(th) day. In conclusion, recording clinical data such as the onset of disease and the date of sample received ensure the accurate evaluation of the disease and the laboratory results are reliably accomplished in a short time

INFLUENZA SURVEILLANCE RESULTS IN 2007-2008 WINTER SEASON IN NINE PROVINCES OF TURKEY

Influenza virus infections constitute a serious public health problem owing to their epidemic and pandemic potential. Turkish Ministry of Health established the national influenza surveillance programme in two institutes to detect the virus types leading to the illness and the efficiency of the seasonal vaccine. Influenza surveillance is performed by Refik Saydam Hygiene Center, National Influenza Laboratory in nine provinces (which are located at central, northeast, south and east parts of Turkey) and by Istanbul University, Medical Faculty, Virology Laboratory in five provinces (which are located at west and northwest parts of Turkey). These two centers are the members of international information networks. The surveillance was aimed to contribute to the detection of influenza viruses with pandemic potential and also to determine the predominant strain circulating in Turkey. During November 2007-May 2008 period a total of 1157 clinical specimens collected from 90 health centers which were the representatives of nine provinces (Ankara, Samsun, Trabzon, Erzurum, Adana, Konya, Diyarbakir, Malatya and Van) were investigated for the presence of influenza virus and other respiratory viruses (Parainfluenza virus types 1-3, Respiratory Synctial Virus and Adenovirus). Samples were identified and subtyped by both molecular (real-time PCR) and cell culture techniques (MDCK and Hep-2). Influenza virus and at least one of the other respiratory viruses were detected in 321 (27.7%) and two different viruses in 16 of the specimens (total= 337). When all the specimens were considered, the most frequently identified virus was influenza A (n= 188, 16.2%), H1N1 being 6.3% and H3N2 9.9%. The rate of identification for influenza B was 7.6% (n= 88), for parainfluenza was 2.3% (n= 27), for adenovirus was 2% (n= 24) and for RSV was 0.9% (n= 10). When only the positive specimens (n= 337) were evaluated, influenza A was again the most frequently (55.7%) encountered virus, H1N1 being 38.8% and H3N2 61.2% of all. Influenza B was in the second rank with 26.1% frequency among the positive specimens. The results showed that influenza activity started around November and ended around May. When the distribution of influenza viruses were analysed according to months, Influenza A H1N1 predominated in January, influenza A H3N2 in December and February. influenza B viruses started to increase in February, and were also detected in May. The 2007-2008 influenza season in Turkey was characterized by moderate clinical activity, and a predominance of influenza A H3N2. These results indicate good match between the vaccine virus strains and the reported virus strains

Epidemiological, Clinical, and Laboratory Features of Children With COVID-19 in Turkey

Objectives: The aim of this study is to identify the epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children

Impact of the COVID‐19 Pandemic on Influenza Circulation During the 2020/21 and 2021/22 Seasons, in Europe

Background: The emergence of SARS‐CoV‐2 in late 2019 saw the implementation of public health and social measures (PHSM) by countries across Europe to reduce its transmission and impact on populations. Consequently, countries reported changes in influenza circulation and extensive disruptions to routine surveillance systems.MethodsWe describe the epidemiology of influenza in Europe between Weeks 40/2020 and 39/2022 compared to the 2016/17 to 2019/20 seasons, to assess the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic and PHSM on surveillance systems and influenza circulation.ResultsLow detections of influenza were observed through primary care sentinel sources during seasonal influenza periods (Week 40 to 20); 56 (of 39,457 specimens tested; < 1% positivity) in 2020/21 and 7261 (of 64,153 specimens tested; 11% positivity) detections in 2021/22 were observed, compared to an average of 18,383 (of 50,544 specimens tested; 36% positivity) detections in 2016/17 to 2019/20. Similarly, 11 (of 19,989 specimens tested; < 1% positivity) and 1488 (of 23,636 specimens tested; 6% positivity) detections were reported through SARI surveillance sources in 2020/21 and 2021/22, respectively, compared to an average of 2850 (of 10,389 specimens tested; 27% positivity) detections in 2016/17 to 2019/20. However, the 2021/22 interseasonal period saw unusual increases in influenza detections across surveillance site types when PHSM were easing.ConclusionIn conclusion, findings suggest that the restriction and easing of PHSM measures were associated with variations in influenza detections. Our observations of out‐of‐season influenza activity highlight the importance of an integrated respiratory surveillance strategy to monitor circulating respiratory viruses throughout the year to inform optimal prevention and control strategies.Data Availability Statement TESSy data are available upon request ([https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/ en/publications-data/european-surveillance-system-tessy])