12 research outputs found

    Potential Neuroregenerative and Neuroprotective Effects of Uridine/Choline-Enriched Multinutrient Dietary Intervention for Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Narrative Review

    No full text
    In mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer disease (AD), also known as prodromal AD, there is evidence for a pathologic shortage of uridine, choline, and docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]), which are key nutrients needed by the brain. Preclinical and clinical evidence shows the importance of nutrient bioavailability to support the development and maintenance of brain structure and function in MCI and AD. Availability of key nutrients is limited in MCI, creating a distinct nutritional need for uridine, choline, and DHA. Evidence suggests that metabolic derangements associated with ageing and disease-related pathology can affect the body’s ability to generate and utilize nutrients. This is reflected in lower levels of nutrients measured in the plasma and brains of individuals with MCI and AD dementia, and progressive loss of cognitive performance. The uridine shortage cannot be corrected by normal diet, making uridine a conditionally essential nutrient in affected individuals. It is also challenging to correct the choline shortfall through diet alone, because brain uptake from the plasma significantly decreases with ageing. There is no strong evidence to support the use of single-agent supplements in the management of MCI due to AD. As uridine and choline work synergistically with DHA to increase phosphatidylcholine formation, there is a compelling rationale to combine these nutrients. A multinutrient enriched with uridine, choline, and DHA developed to support brain function has been evaluated in randomized controlled trials covering a spectrum of dementia from MCI to moderate AD. A randomized controlled trial in subjects with prodromal AD showed that multinutrient intervention slowed brain atrophy and improved some measures of cognition. Based on the available clinical evidence, nutritional intervention should be considered as a part of the approach to the management of individuals with MCI due to AD, including adherence to a healthy, balanced diet, and consideration of evidence-based multinutrient supplements

    A Comparison of Naproxen Sodium to Propranolol Hydrochloride and a Placebo Control for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache

    No full text
    SYNOPSIS A 17 week, double‐blind, randomized, parallel, multicenter study compared naproxen sodium 550 mg bid, propranolol hydrochloride 40 mg tid, and placebo in 129 patients with classical or common migraine. Daily efficacy data were collected during the 12 week full treatment phase. Characteristics measured included headache days, headache severity, nausea, vomiting and visual disturbances. Patients and investigators, separately, rated the overall response and tolerance to the medication at the end of the trial. Patients' daily records revealed a trend toward superiority in the reduction of headache frequency, headache severity, nausea and visual disturbances for naproxen sodium and propranolol hydrochloride when compared to the placebo. In the overall evaluation of therapeutic response, both patients and investigators favored naproxen sodium in comparison with placebo. In a similar paired comparison the patients, but not the investigators, judged the overall response to propranolol better than placebo. In the overall evaluation of tolerance, both the patients and investigators favored propranolol hydrochloride. The majority of patients reported a high incidence and severity of gastrointestinal complaints associated with naproxen sodium treatment than propranolol hydrochloride treatment. The incidence and severity of nongastrointestinal complaints related to naproxen and propranolol hydrochloride treatment were comparable. Headache activity occurring before and after the onset of menses was analyzed for a subset of 30 patients. Those treated with naproxen sodium experienced lesser headache frequency and severity during the week prior to menses, compared with the week after onset of menses. The difference in severity in the naproxen sodium treated patients was statistically significant when compared to the placebo treated patients and approached significance when compared to the propranolol hydrochloride treated patients. In this study naproxen sodium was shown to be an effective prophylactic medication for migraine. A long‐term study, to confirm these findings, seems warranted

    Review and appraisal of concept of sustainable food production systems

    No full text
    corecore