Characterization of applied forces and torques during rigid bronchoscopy intubation

Background:Rigid bronchoscopy intubation poses a significant risk of complication to patients from mechanical trauma. Despite the importance of precision in forces exerted by surgeons during intubation, no prior study has analyzed the overall forces and torques involved in rigid bronchoscopy intubation, and whether existing training modalities accurately replicate them.Methods:A bronchoscope was equipped with a 6-axis load sensor to measure forces and torques applied during rigid bronchoscopy intubation. The device was applied to measure intubation forces in low-fidelity manikins and patients by interventional pulmonologists.Results:Axial and lateral forces were measured during rigid bronchoscope intubation from the mouth to the mid-trachea. The mean axial/lateral forces recorded during manikin trials were 6.93/18.06 N, whereas those recorded during patient trials were 4.57/9.43 N. Average axial and lateral force application was therefore 51.6% and 92.6% higher in manikin, respectively. Applied axial torque averaged across all human trials was 130.5 N-mm compared with 78.3 N-mm for manikin trials, 40% lower in manikin than in human. Lateral torque application during manikin intubation showed greater variation in between trials and a greater range of SDs within trials.Conclusion:This was the first application of a rigid bronchoscope measurement device designed to measure forces applied at the handle. Force and torque discrepancies between manikin training and patient applications were found, indicating a possible mismatch between the haptic feedback received by physicians during rigid training and application. This inconsistency could be resolved via novel haptic training modalities and help increase atraumatic intubations

How Does Reduction Mammaplasty Surgical Technique Impact Clinical, Aesthetic, and Patient-Reported Outcomes?: A Comparison of the Superomedial and Inferior Pedicle Techniques.

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive comparison of surgical, aesthetic, and quality of life outcomes by reduction mammaplasty technique does not exist. We sought to ascertain the effect of technique on clinical, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic macromastia undergoing a superomedial or inferior pedicle reduction mammoplasty by a single surgeon were identified. BREAST-Q surveys were administered. Postoperative breast aesthetics were assessed in 50 matched-patients. Patient characteristics, complications, quality of life, and aesthetic scores were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 101 patients underwent reductions; 60.3% had a superomedial pedicle. Superomedial pedicle patients were more likely to have grade 3 ptosis (P \u3c 0.01) and had significantly shorter procedure time (P \u3c 0.01). Only the inferior pedicle technique resulted in wound dehiscence (P = 0.03) and reoperations from complications (P \u3c 0.01). Those who underwent an inferior pedicle reduction were 4.3 times more likely to experience a postoperative complication (P = 0.03). No differences in quality of life existed between cohorts (P \u3e 0.05). Superomedial pedicle patients received significantly better scarring scores (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The superomedial pedicle reduction mammoplasty technique provides clinical and aesthetic benefits compared with the inferior pedicle technique