5 research outputs found

    Monocyte-derived dendritic cells from breast cancer patients are biased to induce CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells

    Get PDF
    DCs orchestrate immune responses contributing to the pattern of response developed. In cancer, DCs may play a dysfunctional role in the induction of CD4(+)CD25(+) Foxp3(+) Tregs, contributing to immune evasion. We show here that Mo-DCs from breast cancer patients show an altered phenotype and induce preferentially Tregs, a phenomenon that occurred regardless of DC maturation stimulus (sCD40L, cytokine cocktail, TNF-alpha, and LPS). The Mo-DCs of patients induced low proliferation of allogeneic CD3(+)CD25(neg)Foxp3(neg) cells, which after becoming CD25(+), suppressed mitogen-stimulated T cells. Contrastingly, Mo-DCs from healthy donors induced a stronger proliferative response, a low frequency of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) with no suppressive activity. Furthermore, healthy Mo-DCs induced higher levels of IFN-gamma, whereas the Mo-DCs of patients induced higher levels of bioactive TGF-beta 1 and IL-10 in cocultures with allogeneic T cells. Interestingly, TGF-beta 1 blocking with mAb in cocultures was not enough to completely revert the Mo-DCs of patients' bias toward Treg induction. Altogether, these findings should be considered in immunotherapeutic approaches for cancer based on Mo-DCs. J. Leukoc. Biol. 92: 673-682; 2012.Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [09/02074-6, 09/54599-5]Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq

    Human monocytes but not dendritic cells are killed by blocking of autocrine cyclooxygenase activity

    No full text
    Dendritic cells (DCs), in peripheral tissues, derive mostly from blood precursors that differentiate into DCs under the influence of the local microenvironment. Monocytes constitute the main known DC precursors in blood and their infiltration into tissues is up-regulated during inflammation. During this process, the local production of mediators, like prostaglandins (PGs), influence significantly DC differentiation and function. In the present paper we show that treatment of blood adherent mononuclear cells with 10 mu M indomethacin, a dose achieved in human therapeutic settings, causes monocytes` progressive death but does not affect DCs viability or cell surface phenotype. This resistance of DCs was observed both for cells differentiated in vitro from blood monocytes and for a population with DCs characteristics already present in blood. This phenomenon could affect the local balance of antigen-presenting cells, influence the induction and pattern of immune responses developed under the treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and, therefore, deserves further investigation. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)FAPESP[04/09956-0]CNPqConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq

    Laminin-derived peptide C16 regulates Tks expression and reactive oxygen species generation in human prostate cancer cells

    No full text
    Laminin peptides influence cancer biology. We investigated the role of a laminin-derived peptide C16 regulating invadopodia molecules in human prostate cancer cells (DU145). C16 augmented invadopodia activity of DU145 cells, and stimulated expression Tks4, Tks5, cortactin, and membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase 1. Reactive oxygen species generation is also related to invadopodia formation. This prompted us to address whether C16 would induce reactive oxygen species generation in DU145 cells. Quantitative fluorescence and flow cytometry showed that the peptide C16 increased reactive oxygen species in DU145 cells. Furthermore, significant colocalization between Tks5 and reactive oxygen species was observed in C16-treated cells. Results suggested that the peptide C16 increased Tks5 and reactive oxygen species in prostate cancer cells. The role of C16 increasing Tks and reactive oxygen species are novel findings on invadopodia activity2351587CNPQ - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFAPESP – Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa Do Estado De São Paulo304986/2009-7; 471411/2013-2; 303983/2017-52008/57103-8; 2009/17336-6; 2009/16150-6; 2009/16136-3; 2010/07699-1; 2015/03393-9; 2018/03528-
    corecore