Knowledge and interest in medical ethics and bioethics in medical graduation

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the interest and knowledge about Medical Ethics and Bioethics in medical graduation. METHODS: Transversal and descriptive study. Two different questionnaires were applied with questions about the interest in Medical Ethics and Bioethics and the knowledge about the Brazilian Code of Medical Ethics (CME), one to professors and the other to students. RESULTS: One hundred and one professors and 331 students answered the questionnaires. The Brazilian CME had been read by 86.2% of the teachers and by 100% of the students. The importance given to the discipline Medical Ethics, on a scale from 1 to 5, was similar among teachers and students (4.7 ± 0.7 vs. 4.5 ± 0.8; p = 0.086); however the self-evaluation on knowledge about this subject was higher in the first group (3.4 ± 0.9 vs. 3.2 ± 0.7; p = 0.017). In a block with 9 questions, the right answer was given by 5,0 ± 1.9 of teachers and 5.9 ± 1.5 of students (p < 0,001); the mean of correct answers were related to the reading of the CME. CONCLUSIONS: The present study presents unpublished data about the perception of medical teachers and students about medical ethics and bioethics and can be useful for improving the teaching of these disciplines in our medical schools.OBJETIVOS: Avaliar o interesse e o conhecimento sobre ética médica e bioética na graduação médica. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal e descritivo. Foram utilizados dois questionários auto-aplicáveis, um para docentes e outro para discentes, com questões sobre o interesse em ética médica e bioética e conhecimento sobre o Código de Ética Médica (CEM). RESULTADOS: Foram avaliados 101 professores e 331 estudantes. O CEM brasileiro foi lido por 86,2% dos professores e 100% dos alunos. A importância dada à disciplina de ética médica, numa escala de 1 a 5, foi semelhante entre professores e estudantes (4,7 ± 0,7 vs. 4,5 ± 0,8; p = 0,086), enquanto o autoconhecimento sobre o tema foi maior no primeiro grupo (3,4 ± 0,9 vs. 3,2 ± 0,7; p = 0,017). De um total de nove questões avaliadas sobre o conhecimento do CEM, a média de acertos foi de 5,0 ± 1,9 questões para os professores e de 5,9 ± 1,5 para os acadêmicos (p < 0,001), sendo os acertos correlacionados positivamente com a leitura do código. CONCLUSÕES: Este estudo fornece um panorama inédito sobre a percepção de professores e estudantes de Medicina sobre a ética médica e bioética, podendo servir para fundamentar a melhora do ensino dessa disciplina em nossas faculdades.Universidade Federal da BahiaEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde PúblicaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Escola Paulista de Medicina Hospital São PauloInstituto do coração da Bahia Hospital Ana NeryUniversidade Federal da Bahia Hospital Universitário Professor Edgar SantosUNIFESP, EPM, Hospital São PauloSciEL

Conhecimento e interesse em ética médica e bioética na graduação médica

OBJETIVOS: Avaliar o interesse e o conhecimento sobre ética médica e bioética na graduação médica. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal e descritivo. Foram utilizados dois questionários auto-aplicáveis, um para docentes e outro para discentes, com questões sobre o interesse em ética médica e bioética e conhecimento sobre o Código de Ética Médica (CEM). RESULTADOS: Foram avaliados 101 professores e 331 estudantes. O CEM brasileiro foi lido por 86,2% dos professores e 100% dos alunos. A importância dada à disciplina de ética médica, numa escala de 1 a 5, foi semelhante entre professores e estudantes (4,7 ± 0,7 vs. 4,5 ± 0,8; p = 0,086), enquanto o autoconhecimento sobre o tema foi maior no primeiro grupo (3,4 ± 0,9 vs. 3,2 ± 0,7; p = 0,017). De um total de nove questões avaliadas sobre o conhecimento do CEM, a média de acertos foi de 5,0 ± 1,9 questões para os professores e de 5,9 ± 1,5 para os acadêmicos (p < 0,001), sendo os acertos correlacionados positivamente com a leitura do código. CONCLUSÕES: Este estudo fornece um panorama inédito sobre a percepção de professores e estudantes de Medicina sobre a ética médica e bioética, podendo servir para fundamentar a melhora do ensino dessa disciplina em nossas faculdades

The burden of mild asthma: Clinical burden and healthcare resource utilisation in the NOVELTY study

Background: Patients with mild asthma represent a substantial proportion of the population with asthma, yet there are limited data on their true burden of disease. We aimed to describe the clinical and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) burden of physician-assessed mild asthma.Methods: Patients with mild asthma were included from the NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY (NOVELTY; NCT02760329), a global, 3-year, real-world prospective study of patients with asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from community practice (specialised and primary care). Diagnosis and severity were based on physician discretion. Clinical burden included physician-reported exacerbations and patient-reported measures. HCRU included inpatient and outpatient visits.Results: Overall, 2004 patients with mild asthma were included; 22.8% experienced ≥1 exacerbation in the previous 12 months, of whom 72.3% experienced ≥1 severe exacerbation. Of 625 exacerbations reported, 48.0% lasted >1 week, 27.7% were preceded by symptomatic worsening lasting >3 days, and 50.1% required oral corticosteroid treatment. Health status was moderately impacted (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score: 23.5 [standard deviation ± 17.9]). At baseline, 29.7% of patients had asthma symptoms that were not well controlled or very poorly controlled (Asthma Control Test score <20), increasing to 55.6% for those with ≥2 exacerbations in the previous year. In terms of HCRU, at least one unscheduled ambulatory visit for exacerbations was required by 9.5% of patients, including 9.2% requiring ≥1 emergency department visit and 1.1% requiring ≥1 hospital admission.Conclusions: In this global sample representing community practice, a significant proportion of patients with physician-assessed mild asthma had considerable clinical burden and HCRU

Treatable traits in the NOVELTY study

CorrigendumVolume 27, Issue 12, Respirology, pages: 1095-1095. First Published online: November 6, 2022 10.1111/resp.14406International audienceAsthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are two prevalent and complex diseases that require personalized management. Although a strategy based on treatable traits (TTs) has been proposed, the prevalence and relationship of TTs to the diagnostic label and disease severity established by the attending physician in a real-world setting are unknown. We assessed how the presence/absence of specific TTs relate to the diagnosis and severity of 'asthma', 'COPD' or 'asthma + COPD'