23 research outputs found

    The mean number of gridlines crossed (a) and the mean number of times animals were observed using refuge (b) in 30 seconds for <i>Rana aurora</i> (a,b) and <i>Anaxyrus boreas</i> (c,d) in a 2Γ—2 factorial design with two chemical cue treatments (predator, neutral), and two Bd treatments (Bd<sup>+</sup>, Bd<sup>βˆ’</sup>).

    No full text
    <p><i>Rana aurora</i> tadpoles decreased activity in the presence of chemical cues from <i>Taricha</i> predators. Bd<sup>+</sup><i>Anaxyrus boreas</i> tadpoles were more active and used refuge more frequently when exposed to chemical cues of <i>Ambystoma</i> predators compared to neutral chemical cues.</p

    Survival analysis using Cox proportional hazards of amphibian prey species from predation by two salamander species: <i>Taricha granulosa</i> predators on tadpoles of <i>Pseudacris regilla</i> and <i>Rana aurora</i>, and <i>Ambystoma macrodactylum</i> predators of <i>Rana cascadae</i> tadpoles.

    No full text
    <p>Survival analysis using Cox proportional hazards of amphibian prey species from predation by two salamander species: <i>Taricha granulosa</i> predators on tadpoles of <i>Pseudacris regilla</i> and <i>Rana aurora</i>, and <i>Ambystoma macrodactylum</i> predators of <i>Rana cascadae</i> tadpoles.</p

    Dryad primate helminth prevalence

    No full text
    The prevalence of helminth parasites infecting wild primate species (a subset of Global Mammal Parasite Database)

    Two-way ANOVA tables for activity (mean number of gridlines crossed/30 sec) and refuge use (the mean number of times animals were observed using refuge/30 sec) for larvae of four amphibian species in a 2Γ—2 factorial design with two cue treatments (predator, neutral), and two exposure treatments to <i>Batrachochytrium</i> pathogen (Bd<sup>+</sup> and Bd<sup>βˆ’</sup>).

    No full text
    <p>Two-way ANOVA tables for activity (mean number of gridlines crossed/30 sec) and refuge use (the mean number of times animals were observed using refuge/30 sec) for larvae of four amphibian species in a 2Γ—2 factorial design with two cue treatments (predator, neutral), and two exposure treatments to <i>Batrachochytrium</i> pathogen (Bd<sup>+</sup> and Bd<sup>βˆ’</sup>).</p

    Dryad ungulate virus bacteria prevalence

    No full text
    The prevalence of microparasites (viruses and bacteria) infecting non-domesticated ungulate species (a subset of the 2005 update of the Global Mammal Parasite Database)

    Dryad carnivore helminth PSR

    No full text
    The number of unique helminth parasites (parasite species richness (PSR)) infecting wild carnivore species (a subset of the 2005 update of the Global Mammal Parasite Database)

    Dryad D-index carnivores primates ungulates

    No full text
    Defensibility index calculated from day range length and home range area for carnivores, ungulates, and primates. Data collated from PanTHERIA and Carbone et al. 2005. See the manuscript for further details

    Dryad ungulate helminth prevalence

    No full text
    The prevalence of helminth parasites infecting non-domesticated ungulate species (a subset of the 2005 update of the Global Mammal Parasite Database)

    Dryad primate virus bacteria PSR

    No full text
    The number of unique virus and bacteria microparasites (parasite species richness (PSR)) infecting wild primate species (a subset of the Global Mammal Parasite Database)

    Dryad ungulate virus bacteria PSR

    No full text
    The number of unique virus and bacteria microparasites (parasite species richness (PSR)) infecting non-domesticated ungulate species (a subset of the 2005 update of the Global Mammal Parasite Database)
    corecore