Hot or not? Discovery and characterization of a thermostable alditol oxidase from Acidothermus cellulolyticus 11B

We describe the discovery, isolation and characterization of a highly thermostable alditol oxidase from Acidothermus cellulolyticus 11B. This protein was identified by searching the genomes of known thermophiles for enzymes homologous to Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) alditol oxidase (AldO). A gene (sharing 48% protein sequence identity to AldO) was identified, cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli. Following 6xHis tag purification, characterization revealed the protein to be a covalent flavoprotein of 47 kDa with a remarkably similar reactivity and substrate specificity to that of AldO. A steady-state kinetic analysis with a number of different polyol substrates revealed lower catalytic rates but slightly altered substrate specificity when compared to AldO. Thermostability measurements revealed that the novel AldO is a highly thermostable enzyme with an unfolding temperature of 84 °C and an activity half-life at 75 °C of 112 min, prompting the name HotAldO. Inspired by earlier studies, we attempted a straightforward, exploratory approach to improve the thermostability of AldO by replacing residues with high B-factors with corresponding residues from HotAldO. None of these mutations resulted in a more thermostable oxidase; a fact that was corroborated by in silico analysis

GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

The third Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog (GWTC-3) describes signals detected with Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo up to the end of their third observing run. Updating the previous GWTC-2.1, we present candidate gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences during the second half of the third observing run (O3b) between 1 November 2019, 15∶00 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) and 27 March 2020, 17∶00 UTC. There are 35 compact binary coalescence candidates identified by at least one of our search algorithms with a probability of astrophysical origin pastro>0.5. Of these, 18 were previously reported as low-latency public alerts, and 17 are reported here for the first time. Based upon estimates for the component masses, our O3b candidates with pastro>0.5 are consistent with gravitational-wave signals from binary black holes or neutron-star-black-hole binaries, and we identify none from binary neutron stars. However, from the gravitational-wave data alone, we are not able to measure matter effects that distinguish whether the binary components are neutron stars or black holes. The range of inferred component masses is similar to that found with previous catalogs, but the O3b candidates include the first confident observations of neutron-star-black-hole binaries. Including the 35 candidates from O3b in addition to those from GWTC-2.1, GWTC-3 contains 90 candidates found by our analysis with pastro>0.5 across the first three observing runs. These observations of compact binary coalescences present an unprecedented view of the properties of black holes and neutron stars

Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC-3

We use 47 gravitational wave sources from the Third LIGO-Virgo-Kamioka Gravitational Wave Detector Gravitational Wave Transient Catalog (GWTC-3) to estimate the Hubble parameter H(z), including its current value, the Hubble constant H0. Each gravitational wave (GW) signal provides the luminosity distance to the source, and we estimate the corresponding redshift using two methods: the redshifted masses and a galaxy catalog. Using the binary black hole (BBH) redshifted masses, we simultaneously infer the source mass distribution and H(z). The source mass distribution displays a peak around 34Me, followed by a drop-off. Assuming this mass scale does not evolve with the redshift results in a H(z) measurement, yielding H0 = 68+12-8 km s-1 Mpc-1 (68% credible interval) when combined with the H0 measurement from GW170817 and its electromagnetic counterpart. This represents an improvement of 17% with respect to the H0 estimate from GWTC-1. The second method associates each GW event with its probable host galaxy in the catalog GLADE+, statistically marginalizing over the redshifts of each event's potential hosts. Assuming a fixed BBH population, we estimate a value of H0 = 68+8-6 km s-1 Mpc-1 with the galaxy catalog method, an improvement of 42% with respect to our GWTC-1 result and 20% with respect to recent H0 studies using GWTC-2 events. However, we show that this result is strongly impacted by assumptions about the BBH source mass distribution; the only event which is not strongly impacted by such assumptions (and is thus informative about H0) is the well-localized event GW190814

Open Data from the Third Observing Run of LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO

The global network of gravitational-wave observatories now includes five detectors, namely LIGO Hanford, LIGO Livingston, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO 600. These detectors collected data during their third observing run, O3, composed of three phases: O3a starting in 2019 April and lasting six months, O3b starting in 2019 November and lasting five months, and O3GK starting in 2020 April and lasting two weeks. In this paper we describe these data and various other science products that can be freely accessed through the Gravitational Wave Open Science Center at https://gwosc.org. The main data set, consisting of the gravitational-wave strain time series that contains the astrophysical signals, is released together with supporting data useful for their analysis and documentation, tutorials, as well as analysis software packages

Search for Gravitational Waves Associated with Fast Radio Bursts Detected by CHIME/FRB during the LIGO-Virgo Observing Run O3a

We search for gravitational-wave (GW) transients associated with fast radio bursts (FRBs) detected by the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment Fast Radio Burst Project, during the first part of the third observing run of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo (2019 April 1 15:00 UTC-2019 October 1 15:00 UTC). Triggers from 22 FRBs were analyzed with a search that targets both binary neutron star (BNS) and neutron star-black hole (NSBH) mergers. A targeted search for generic GW transients was conducted on 40 FRBs. We find no significant evidence for a GW association in either search. Given the large uncertainties in the distances of our FRB sample, we are unable to exclude the possibility of a GW association. Assessing the volumetric event rates of both FRB and binary mergers, an association is limited to 15% of the FRB population for BNS mergers or 1% for NSBH mergers. We report 90% confidence lower bounds on the distance to each FRB for a range of GW progenitor models and set upper limits on the energy emitted through GWs for a range of emission scenarios. We find values of order 1051-1057 erg for models with central GW frequencies in the range 70-3560 Hz. At the sensitivity of this search, we find these limits to be above the predicted GW emissions for the models considered. We also find no significant coincident detection of GWs with the repeater, FRB 20200120E, which is the closest known extragalactic FRB

Enzymatic Glucose Based Bio batteries: Bioenergy to Fuel Next Generation Devices

[EN] This article consists of a review of the main concepts and paradigms established in the field of biological fuel cells or biofuel cells. The aim is to provide an overview of the current panorama, basic concepts, and methodologies used in the field of enzymatic biofuel cells, as well as the applications of these bio-systems in flexible electronics and implantable or portable devices. Finally, the challenges needing to be addressed in the development of biofuel cells capable of supplying power to small size devices with applications in areas related to health and well-being or next-generation portable devices are analyzed. The aim of this study is to contribute to biofuel cell technology development; this is a multidisciplinary topic about which review articles related to different scientific areas, from Materials Science to technology applications, can be found. With this article, the authors intend to reach a wide readership in order to spread biofuel cell technology for different scientific profiles and boost new contributions and developments to overcome future challenges.Financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and University, through the State Program for Talent and Employability Promotion 2013-2016 by means of Torres Quevedo research contract in the framework of Bio2 project (PTQ-14-07145) and from the Instituto Valenciano de Competitividad Empresarial-IVACE-GVA (BioSensCell project)Buaki-Sogo, M.; García-Carmona, L.; Gil Agustí, MT.; Zubizarreta Saenz De Zaitegui, L.; García Pellicer, M.; Quijano-Lopez, A. (2020). Enzymatic Glucose Based Bio batteries: Bioenergy to Fuel Next Generation Devices. Topics in Current Chemistry (Online). 378(6):1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41061-020-00312-8S1283786Schlögl R (2015) The revolution continues: Energiewende 2.0. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:4436–4439Mitcheson PD, Yeatman EM, Rao GK, Holmes AS, Green TC (2008) Energy harvesting from human and machine motion for wireless electronic devices. Proc IEEE 96(9):1457–1486Wang ZL, Wu W (2012) Nanotechnology-enabled energy harvesting for self-powered micro-/nanosystems. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:11700-11721Lamy C, Lima A, LeRhun V, Delime F, Coutanceau C, Léger J-M (2002) Recent advances in the development of direct alcohol fuel cells (DAFC). J Power Sources 105:283Cheng X, Shi Z, Glass N, Zhang L, Zhang J, Song D, Liu Z-S, Wang H, Shen J (2007) A review of PEM hydrogen fuel cell contamination: impacts, mechanisms, and mitigation. J Power Sources 165:739Boudghere Stambouli A, Traversa E (2002) Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC): a review of an environmentally clean and efficient source of energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 6:433–455Qiao Y, Li CM (2011) Nanostructured catalyst in fuel cells. J Mater Chem 21:4027–4036Edwards PP, Kuznetsov VL, David WIF, Brandon NP (2008) Hydrogen and fuel cells: towards sustainable energy future. Energy Policy 36:4356–4362Kirubakaran A, Jain S, Nema RK (2009) A review on fuel cell technologies and power electronic interface. Renew Sustain Energy 13:2430–2440Kerzenmacher S, Ducree J, Zengerle R, von Stetten F (2008) An abiotically catalyzed glucose fuel cell for powering medical implants: reconstructed manufacturing protocol and analysis of performance. J Power Sources 182:66–75Drake RF, Kusserow BK, Messinger S, Matsuda S (1970) A tissue implantable fuel cell power supply. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 16:199–205Giner J, Holleck G, Malachesky PA (1973) Eine implantierbare Brennstoffzelle zum Betrieb eines mechanischen Herzens. Phys Chem 77:782–783. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbpc.19730771009Cosnier S, LeGoff A, Holzinger M (2014) Towards glucose biofuel cells implanted in human body for powering artificial organs: review. Electrochem Commun 38:19–23Katz E (2015) Implantable biofuel cells operating in vivo—potential power sources for bioelectronic devices. Bioelectron Med 2:1–12Bullen RA, Arnot TC, Lakeman JB, Walsh FC (2006a) Biofuel cells and their development . Biosens Bioelectron 21:2015–2045Cooney MJ, Svoboda V, Lau C, Martin G, Minteer SD (2008) Enzyme catalysed biofuel cells. Energy Environ Sci 1:320–337Cracknell JA, Vincent KA, Armstrong FA (2008) Enzymes as working or inspirational electrocatalysts for fuel cells and electrolysis. Chem Rev 108:2439–2461Sheldon RA (2007) Enzyme immobilization: the quest for optimum performance. Adv Synth Catal 349:1289–1307Bullen RA, Arnot TC, Lakeman JB, Walsh FC (2006b) Biofuel cells and their development. Biosens Bioelectron 21:2015–2045Koch C, Popiel D, Harnisch F (2014) Functional redundancy of microbial anodes fed by domestic wastewater. ChemElectroChem 1:1923–1931Mano N, Mao F, Heller A (2003) Characteristics of a miniature compartment-less glucose−O2 biofuel cell and its operation in a living plant. J Am Chem Soc 125(21):6588–6594Mano N, Mao F, Heller A (2002) A miniature biofuel cell operating in a physiological buffer. J Am Chem Soc 124(44):12962–12963Bruen D, Delaney C, Florea L, Diamond D (2017) Glucose sensing for diabetes monitoring: recent developments. Sensors 17:1866Falk M, Blum Z, Shleev S (2012) Direct electron transfer based enzymatic fuel cells. Electrochim Acta 82:191–202White HB (1976) Coenzymes as fossils of an earlier metabolic state. J Mol Evol 7:101–104Broderick JB (2001) Coenzymes and cofactors. In: eLS. Wiley, Chichester. https://www.els.net. https://doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.0000631Sakurai T, Kataoka K (2007) Basic and applied features of multicopper oxidases, CueO, bilirubin oxidase, and laccase. Chem Rec 7:220–229Bankar SB, Bule MV, Singhal RS, Ananthanarayan L (2009) Glucose oxidase—an overview. Biotech Adv 27:489–501Ferri S, Kojima K, Sode K (2011) Review of glucose oxidases and glucose dehydrogenases: a bird’s eye view of glucose sensing enzymes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 5:1068–1076Katz E, MacVittie K (2013) Implanted biofuel cells operating in vivo—methods, applications and perspectives—feature article. Energy Environ Sci 6:2791–2803Ghindilis AL, Atanasov P, Wilkins E (1997) Enzyme catalysed direct electron transfer: fundamentals and analytical applications. Electroanalysis 9:661–674Von Woedtke Th, Fisher U, Abel P (1994) Glucose oxidase electrodes: effect of H2O2 on enzyme activity? Biosens Bioelectron 9:65–71Kleppe K (1966) The effect of H2O2 on glucose oxidase from Aspergillus niger. Biochemistry 5:139–143Zebda A, Godran C, Le Goff A, Holzinger M, Cinquin P, Cosnier S (2011) Mediatorless high-power glucose biofuel cells based on compressed carbon nanotube-enzyme electrodes. Nat Commun 2:370Borenstein A, Hanna O, Attias R, Luski S, Brousse T, Aurbach D (2017) Carbon-based composite materials for supercapacitor electrodes: a review. J Mater Chem A 5:12653–12672Angione MD, Pilolli R, Cotrone S, Magliulo M, Mallardi A, Palazzo G, Sabbatini L, Fine D, Dodabalapur A, Lioffi N, Torsi L (2011) Carbon based nanomaterials for electronic bio-sensing. Mat Today 14:424–433Cha C, Shin SR, Annabi N, Dokmeci MR, Khademhosseini A (2013) Carbon based nanomaterials: multifunctional materials for biomedical engineering. ACS Nano 7:2891–2897Wang Z, Dai Z (2015) Carbon nanomaterials-based electrochemical biosensors: an overview. Nanoscale 7:6420–6431Jariwala D, Sangwan VK, Lauhon LJ, Marks TJ, Hersam MC (2013) Carbon nanomaterials for electronics, optoelectronics, photovoltaics and sensing. Chem Soc Rev 42:2824–2860Babadi AA, Bagheri S, Abdul Hamid SB (2016) Progress on implantable biofuel cell: nano-carbon functionalization for enzyme immobilization enhancement. Biosens Bioelectron 15:850–860Osadebe I, Leech D (2014) Effect of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on glucose oxidation by glucose oxidase or a flavin-dependent glucose dehydrogenase in redox-polymer-mediated enzymatic fuel cell anodes. ChemElectroChem 1:1988–1993Si P, Huang Y, Wang T, Ma J (2013) Nanomaterials for electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose biosensors. RSC Adv 3:3487–3502Putzbach W, Ronkainen NJ (2013) Immobilization techniques in the fabrication of nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors: a review. Sensors 13(4):4811–4840Walcarius A, Minteer SD, Wang J, Lin Y, Merkoçi A (2013) Nanomaterials for bio-functionalized electrodes: recent trends. J Mater Chem B 1:4878–4908Datta S, Christena LR, Rajaram YRS (2013) Enzyme immobilization: an overview on techniques and support materials. 3 Biotech 3(1):1–9Ivanov I, Vidaković-Koch T, Sundmaker K (2010) Recent advances in enzymatic fuel cells; experiments and modelling. Energies 3:803–846Nguyen HH, Kim M (2017) An overview of techniques in enzyme immobilization. Appl Sci Converg Technol 26(6):157–163Fu J, Reinhold J, Woodbury NW (2011) Peptide-modified surfaces for enzyme immobilization. PLoS One 6(4):e18692Lee DH, Park CH, Yeo JM, Kim SW (2006) Lipase immobilization on silica gel using a cross-linking method. J Ind Eng Chem 12(5):777–782Szymańska K, Bryjak J, Jarzębski AB (2009) Immobilization of invertase on mesoporous silicas to obtain hyper active biocatalysts. Top Catal 52:1030–1036Al-Lolage F, Meneghello M, Ma S, Ludwig R, Barlett PN (2017) A flexible method for the stable, covalent immobilization of enzymes at electrode surfaces. ChemElectroChem 4:1528–1534Gutierrez-Sanchez C, Shleev S, De Lacey AL, Pita M (2015) Third-generation oxygen amperometric biosensor based on Trametes hirsuta laccase covalently bound to graphite electrode. Chem Pap 69:237–240Pita M, Gutierrez-Sanchez C, Toscano MD, Shleev S, De Lacey AL (2013) Oxygen biosensor based on bilirubin oxidase immobilized on a nanostructured gold electrode. Bioelectrochemistry 94:69–74Vaz-Dominguez C, Campuzano S, Rüdiger O, Pita M, Gorbacheva M, Shleev S, Fernandez VM, de Lacey LA (2008) Laccase electrode for direct electrocatalytic reduction of O2 to H2O with high-operational stability and resistance to chloride inhibition. Biosens Bioelectron 24(4):531–537Gutiérrez-Sánchez C, Jia W, Beyl Y, Pita M, Schuhmann W, de Lacey LA, Stoica L (2012) Enhanced direct electron transfer between laccase and hierarchical carbon microfibers/carbon nanotubes composite electrodes. Comparison of three enzyme immobilization methods. Electrochim Acta 82:218–223Lv Y, Jin S, Wang Y, Lun Z, Xia C (2016) Recent advances in the application of nanomaterials in enzymatic glucose sensors. J Iran Chem Soc 13(10):1767–1776Zhao C, Gai P, Song R, Chen Y, Zhang J, Zhu J-J (2017) Nanostructured material-based biofuel cells: recent advances and future prospects. Chem Soc Rev 46:1545–1564Yu EH, Scott K (2010) Enzymatic biofuel cells—fabrication of enzyme electrodes. Energies 3:23–42Minteer SD, Atanassov P, Luckarift HR, Johnson GR (2013) New materials for biological fuel cells. Mater Today 15(4):166–173Sarma AK, Vatsyayan P, Goswami P, Minteer SD (2009) Recent advances in material science for developing enzyme electrodes. Biosens Bioelectron 24:2313–2322Jesionowski T, Zdarta J, Krajewska B (2014) Enzyme immobilization by adsorption: a review. Adsorption 20:801–821Sardar M, Gupta MN (2005) Immobilization of tomato pectinase on Con A-Seralose 4B by bioaffinity layering. Enzyme Microbial Technol 37:355–359Sheldon RA (2011) Characteristic features and biotechnological applications of cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 92:467–477Velasco-Lozano S, López-Gallego F, Mateos-Díaz JC, Favela-Torres E (2015) Cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEA) in enzyme improvement—a review. Biocatalysis 1:166–177Cosnier S (1999) Biomolecule immobilization on electrode surfaces by entrapment or attachment to electrochemically polymerized films. A review. Biosen Bioelectron 14:443–456Heller A (1990) Electrical wiring of redox enzymes. Acc Chem Res 29:128–134Heller A (1992) Electrical connection of enzyme redox centres to electrodes. J Phys Chem 96:3579–3587Martins MVA, Pereira AR, Luz RAS, Iost RM, Crespilho FN (2014) Evidence of short-range electron transfer of a redox enzyme on graphene oxide electrodes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:17426–17436Luz RAS, Pereira AR, de Souza JCP, Sales FCPF, Crespilho FN (2014) Enzyme biofuel cells: thermodynamics. Kinetics and challenges in applicability. ChemElectroChem 1(11):1751–1777Neto SA, De Andrade AR (2013) New energy sources: the enzymatic biofuel cell. J Braz Chem Soc 24(12):1891–1912Rapoport BI, Kedzierski JT, Sarpeshkar R (2012) A glucose fuel cell for implantable brain–machine interfaces. PLoS One 7(6):6 e38436Zebda A, Alcaraz J-P, Vadgama P, Shleev S, Minteer SD, Boucher F, Cinquin P, Martin DK (2018) Challenges for successful implantation of biofuel cells. Bioelectrochemistry 124:57–72Ferraris RP, Diamond J (1997) Regulation of intestinal sugar transport. Physiol Rev 77:257–301Sprague JE, Arbeláez AM (2011) Glucose counterregulatory responses to hypoglicemia. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 9:463–475Slaughter G, Kulkarni T (2019) Detection of human plasma glucose using a self-powered glucose biosensor. Energies 12:825Rathee K, Dhull V, Dhull R, Singh S (2016) Biosensors based on electrochemical lactate detection: a comprehensive review. Biochem Biophys Rep 5:35–54Koushanpour A, Gamella M, Katz E (2017) A biofuel cell based on biocatalytic reactions of lactate on both anode and cathode electrodes—extracting electrical power from human sweat. Electroanalysis 29:1602–1611Yao Y, Li H, Wang D, Liu C, Zhang C (2017) An electrochemiluminescence cloth-based biosensor with smartphone-based imaging for detection of lactate in saliva. Analyst 142:3715–3724Pankratov D, González-Arribas E, Blum Z, Shleev S (2016) Tear based bioelectronics. Electroanalysis 28:1250–1266Krogstad AL, Jansson PA, Gisslen P, Lönnroth P (1996) Microdialysis methodology for the measurement of dermal interstitial fluid in humans. Br J Dermatol 134(6):1005–1012Bandodkar AJ, Wang J (2016) Wearable biofuel cells: a review. Electroanalysis 28:1188–1200Jia W, Valdés-Ramírez G, Bandodkar AJ, Windmiller JR, Wang J (2013) Epidermal biofuel cells: energy harvesting from human perspiration. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:1–5Jeerapan I, Sempionatto JR, Pavinatto A, You J-M, Wang J (2016) Stretchable biofuel cells as wearable textile-based self-powered sensors. J Mater Chem A 4:18342–18353Valdés-Ramírez G, Li Y-G, Kima J, Jia W, Bandodkar AJ, Nuñez-Flores R, Miller PR, Wu S-Y, Narayan R, Windmiller JR, Polsky R, Wang J (2016) Microneedle-based self-powered glucose sensor. Electrochem Commun 47:58–62Gamella M, Koushanpour A, Katz E (2018) Biofuel cells—activation of micro- and macro- electronic devices. Bioelectrochemistry 119:33–42Mano N, Mao F, Shin W, Chen T, Heller A (2003) A miniature biofuel cell operating at 0.78 V. Chem Commun 20:518–519Shi B, Li Z, Fan Y (2018) Implantable energy harvesting devices. Adv Mater 30:1801511MacVittie K, Halámek J, Halámková L, Southcott M, Jemison WD, Lobel R, Katz E (2013) From “cyborg” lobsters to a pacemaker powered by implantable biofuel cells. Energy Environ Sci 6:81–86Szczupak A, Halámek J, Halámková L, Bocharova V, Alfonta L, Katz E (2012) Living battery—biofuel cells operating in vivo in clams. Energy Environ Sci 5:8891–8895Southcott M, MacVittie K, Halámek J, Halámková L, Jemison WD, Lobel R, Katz E (2013) A pacemaker powered by an implantable biofuel cell operating under conditions mimicking the human blood circulatory system—battery not included. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:6278–6283MacVittie K, Conlon T, Katz E (2015) A wireless transmission system powered by an enzyme biofuel cell implanted in an orange. Bioelectrochemistry 106:28–33Aghahosseini H, Ramazani A, Asiabi PA, Gouranlou F, Hosseini F, Rezaei A, Min B-K, Joo SW (2016) Glucose-based biofuel cells: nanotechnology as a vital science in biofuel cell performance. Nanochem Res 1(2):83–204Zebda A, Cosnier S, Alcaraz J-P, Holzinger M, Le Goff A, Gondran C, Boucher F, Giroud F, Gorgy K, Lamraoui H, Cinquin P (2013) Single glucose biofuel cells implanted in rats power electronic devices. Sci Rep 2013:1516Ichi-Ribault SE, Alcaraz J-P, Boucher F, Boutaud B, Dalmolin R, Boutonnat J, Cinquin P, Zebda A, Martin DK (2018) Remote wireless control of an enzymatic biofuel cell implanted in a rabbit for 2 months. Electrochim Acta 269:360–366Bandodkar A (2017) Review—wearable biofuel cells: past, present and future. J Electrochem Soc 164(3):H3007–H3014Coman V, Ludwig R, Harreither W, Haltrich D, Gorton L, Ruzgas T, Shleev S (2010) A direct electron transfer-based glucose/oxygen biofuel cell operating in human serum. Fuel Cells 10(1):9–16Shoji K, Akiyama Y, Suzuki M, Nakamura N, Ohno H, Morishima K (2016) Biofuel cell backpacked insect and its application to wireless sensing. Biosens Bioelectron 78:390–395Reuillard B, Abreu C, Lalaoui N, Le Goff A, Holzinger M, Ondel O, Buret F, Cosnier S (2015) One-year stability for a glucose/oxygen biofuel cell combined with pH reactivation of the laccase/carbon nanotube biocathode. Bioelectrochemistry 106:73–76Sales FCPF, Iost RM, Martins MVA, Almeida MC, Crespilho FN (2013) An intravenous implantable glucose/dioxygen biofuel cell with modified flexible carbon fiber electrodes. Lab Chip 13:468Falk M, Narvez Villarrubia CW, Babanova S, Atanassov P, Shleev S (2013) Biofuel cells for biomedical applications: colonizing the animal kingdom. ChemPhysChem 14:2045–2058Rasmussen M, Ritzmann RE, Lee I, Pollack AJ, Scherson D (2012) An implantable biofuel cell for a live insect. J Am Chem Soc 134(3):1458–1460Halámková L, Halámek J, Bocharova V, Szczupak A, Alfonta L, Katz E (2012) Implanted biofuel cell operating in a living snail. J Am Chem Soc 134:5040–5043Cinquin P, Gondran C, Giroud F, Mazabrard S, Pellisier A, Boucher F, Alcaraz J-P, Gorgy K, Lenouvel F, Mathé S, Porcu P, Cosnier S (2010) A glucose biofuel cell implanted in rats. Plos One 5(5):e010476Chen C, Xie Q, Yang D, Xiao H, Fu Y, Tan S, Yao S (2013) Recent advances in electrochemical glucose biosensors: a review. RSC Adv 3:4473–4491Andoralov V, Falk M, Suyatin DB, Granmo M, Sotres J, Ludwig R, Popov VO, Schouenborg J, Blum Z, Shleev S (2013) Biofuel cell based on microscale nanostructured electrodes with inductive coupling to rat brain neuronsVerbeek MM, Leen WG, Willemsen MA, Slats D, Claassen JA (2016) Hourly analysis of cerebrospinal fluid glucose shows large diurnal fluctuations. J Cereb Blood F Met 36(5):899–902González-Guerrero MJ, Del Campo FJ, Esquivel JP, Leech D, Sabaté N (2017) Paper-based microfluidic biofuel cell operating under glucose concentrations within physiological range. Biosens Bioelectron 90:475–480Takeuchi ES, Leising RA (2002) Lithium batteries for biomedical applications. MRS Bull 27(8):624–627Bock DC, Marschilok A, Takeuchi KJ, Takeuchi ES (2012) Batteries used to power implantable biomedical devices. Electrochim Acta 84:155–164Greatbatch W, Lee JH, Mathias W, Eldridge M, Moser JR, Schneider AA (1971) The solid-state lithium battery: a new improved chemical power source for implantable cardiac pacemaker. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 18(5):317–324Liu Y, Dong S (2007) A biofuel cell with enhanced power output by grape juice. Electrochem Commun 9(7):1423–1427Choi S, Lee H, Ghaffari R, Hyeon T, Kim D-H (2016) Recent advances in flexible and stretchable bio-electronic devices integrated with nanomaterials. Adv Mater 28:4203–4218Zhou L, Mao J, Ren Y, Han ST, Roy VAL, Zhou Y (2018) Recent advances of flexible data storage devices based on organic nanoscale materials. Small 14(10):1703126Gwon H, Kim H-S, Lee KU, Seo D-H, Park YC, Lee Y-S, Ahn BT, Kong K (2011) Flexible energy storage devices based on graphene paper. Energy Environ Sci 4:1277–1283Pang C, Lee C, Suh K-Y (2013) Recent advances in flexible sensors for wearable and implantable devices. J Appl Pol Sci 130:1429–1441Bandodkar AJ, Wang J (2014) Non-invasive wearable electrochemical sensors: a review. Trends Biotech 32(7):363–371Bandodkar AJ, Uia W, Wang J (2015) Tatto-based wearable electrochemical devices: a review. Electroanalysis 27(3):562–572Reid RC, Minteer SD, Gale BK (2015) Contact lens biofuel cell tested in a synthetic tear solution. Biosens Bioelectron 68:142Falk M, Andoralov V, Blum Z, Sotres J, Suyatin DM, Ruzgas T, Arnebrant T, Shleev S (2012) Biofuel cells as a power source for electronic contact lenses. Biosens Bioelectron 37(1):38–45Falk M, Andoralov V, Silow M, Toscano MD, Shleev S (2013) Miniature biofuel cell as a potential power source for Glucose-sensing contact lenses. Anal Chem 85(13):6342–6348Reid R, Jones SR, Hickey DP, Minteer SD, Gale BK (2016) Modeling carbon nanotubes connectivity and surface activity in a contact lens biofuel cell. Electrochim Acta 203:30–40Blum Z, Pankratov D, Shleev S (2014) Powering electronic contact lenses: current achievements, challenges and perspective. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 9(4):269–273Xiao X, Siepenkoetter T, Conghaile PÓ, Leech D, Magner E (2018) Nanoporous gold-based biofuel cell on contact lenses. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(8):7107–7116Yang X-Y, Tian G, Jiang N, Su B-L (2012) Immobilization technology: a sustainable solution for biofuel cell design. Ener Environ Sci 5:5540–5563Mano N (2019) Engineering glucose oxidase for bioelectrochemical applications. Bioelectrochemistry 128:218–240Mate DM, Gonzalez-Perez D, Falk M, Kittl R, Pita M, De Lacey LA, Ludwig R, Shleev S, Alcalde M (2013) Blood tolerant caccase by directed evolution. Chem Biol 20:223–231Zhang L, Carucci C, Reculusa S, Goudeau B, Lefrançois P, Gounel S, Mano N, Kuhn A (2019) Rational design of enzyme-modified electrodes for optimized bioelectrocatalytic activity. ChemElectroChem 6(19):4980–4984Arechederra MN, Addo PK, Minteer SD (2011) Poly(neutral red) as a NAD+ reduction catalyst and a NADH oxidation catalyst: towards the development of a rechargeable biobattery. Electrochim Acta 56:1585Yang Y, Wang ZL (2015) Hybrid energy cells for simultaneously harvesting multi-types of energies. NanoEnergy 14:245–256Hansen BJ, Liu Y, Yang R, Wang ZL (2010) Hybrid nanogenerator for concurrently harvesting biomechanical and biochemical energy. ACS Nano 4:3647Song K, Han JH,

GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object

We report the observation of a compact binary coalescence involving a 22.2 - 24.3 $M_{\odot}$ black hole and a compact object with a mass of 2.50 - 2.67 $M_{\odot}$ (all measurements quoted at the 90$\%$ credible level). The gravitational-wave signal, GW190814, was observed during LIGO's and Virgo's third observing run on August 14, 2019 at 21:10:39 UTC and has a signal-to-noise ratio of 25 in the three-detector network. The source was localized to 18.5 deg$^2$ at a distance of $241^{+41}_{-45}$ Mpc; no electromagnetic counterpart has been confirmed to date. The source has the most unequal mass ratio yet measured with gravitational waves, $0.112^{+0.008}_{-0.009}$, and its secondary component is either the lightest black hole or the heaviest neutron star ever discovered in a double compact-object system. The dimensionless spin of the primary black hole is tightly constrained to $\leq 0.07$. Tests of general relativity reveal no measurable deviations from the theory, and its prediction of higher-multipole emission is confirmed at high confidence. We estimate a merger rate density of 1-23 Gpc$^{-3}$ yr$^{-1}$ for the new class of binary coalescence sources that GW190814 represents. Astrophysical models predict that binaries with mass ratios similar to this event can form through several channels, but are unlikely to have formed in globular clusters. However, the combination of mass ratio, component masses, and the inferred merger rate for this event challenges all current models for the formation and mass distribution of compact-object binaries

Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star-Black Hole Coalescences

We report the observation of gravitational waves from two compact binary coalescences in LIGO's and Virgo's third observing run with properties consistent with neutron star-black hole (NSBH) binaries. The two events are named GW200105_162426 and GW200115_042309, abbreviated as GW200105 and GW200115; the first was observed by LIGO Livingston and Virgo, and the second by all three LIGO-Virgo detectors. The source of GW200105 has component masses $8.9^{+1.2}_{-1.5}\,M_\odot$ and $1.9^{+0.3}_{-0.2}\,M_\odot$, whereas the source of GW200115 has component masses $5.7^{+1.8}_{-2.1}\,M_\odot$ and $1.5^{+0.7}_{-0.3}\,M_\odot$ (all measurements quoted at the 90% credible level). The probability that the secondary's mass is below the maximal mass of a neutron star is 89%-96% and 87%-98%, respectively, for GW200105 and GW200115, with the ranges arising from different astrophysical assumptions. The source luminosity distances are $280^{+110}_{-110}$ Mpc and $300^{+150}_{-100}$ Mpc, respectively. The magnitude of the primary spin of GW200105 is less than 0.23 at the 90% credible level, and its orientation is unconstrained. For GW200115, the primary spin has a negative spin projection onto the orbital angular momentum at 88% probability. We are unable to constrain spin or tidal deformation of the secondary component for either event. We infer a NSBH merger rate density of $45^{+75}_{-33}\,\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3} \mathrm{yr}^{-1}$ when assuming GW200105 and GW200115 are representative of the NSBH population, or $130^{+112}_{-69}\,\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3} \mathrm{yr}^{-1}$ under the assumption of a broader distribution of component masses

Search for gravitational waves associated with gamma-ray bursts detected by Fermi and Swift during the LIGO–Virgo run O3b

We search for gravitational-wave signals associated with gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected by the Fermi and Swift satellites during the second half of the third observing run of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo (2019 November 1 15:00 UTC–2020 March 27 17:00 UTC). We conduct two independent searches: a generic gravitational-wave transients search to analyze 86 GRBs and an analysis to target binary mergers with at least one neutron star as short GRB progenitors for 17 events. We find no significant evidence for gravitational-wave signals associated with any of these GRBs. A weighted binomial test of the combined results finds no evidence for subthreshold gravitational-wave signals associated with this GRB ensemble either. We use several source types and signal morphologies during the searches, resulting in lower bounds on the estimated distance to each GRB. Finally, we constrain the population of low-luminosity short GRBs using results from the first to the third observing runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo. The resulting population is in accordance with the local binary neutron star merger rate