16 research outputs found
Hsf1 Activation Inhibits Rapamycin Resistance and TOR Signaling in Yeast Revealed by Combined Proteomic and Genetic Analysis
TOR kinases integrate environmental and nutritional signals to regulate cell growth in eukaryotic organisms. Here, we describe results from a study combining quantitative proteomics and comparative expression analysis in the budding yeast, S. cerevisiae, to gain insights into TOR function and regulation. We profiled protein abundance changes under conditions of TOR inhibition by rapamycin treatment, and compared this data to existing expression information for corresponding gene products measured under a variety of conditions in yeast. Among proteins showing abundance changes upon rapamycin treatment, almost 90% of them demonstrated homodirectional (i.e., in similar direction) transcriptomic changes under conditions of heat/oxidative stress. Because the known downstream responses regulated by Tor1/2 did not fully explain the extent of overlap between these two conditions, we tested for novel connections between the major regulators of heat/oxidative stress response and the TOR pathway. Specifically, we hypothesized that activation of regulator(s) of heat/oxidative stress responses phenocopied TOR inhibition and sought to identify these putative TOR inhibitor(s). Among the stress regulators tested, we found that cells (hsf1-R206S, F256S and ssa1-3 ssa2-2) constitutively activated for heat shock transcription factor 1, Hsf1, inhibited rapamycin resistance. Further analysis of the hsf1-R206S, F256S allele revealed that these cells also displayed multiple phenotypes consistent with reduced TOR signaling. Among the multiple Hsf1 targets elevated in hsf1-R206S, F256S cells, deletion of PIR3 and YRO2 suppressed the TOR-regulated phenotypes. In contrast to our observations in cells activated for Hsf1, constitutive activation of other regulators of heat/oxidative stress responses, such as Msn2/4 and Hyr1, did not inhibit TOR signaling. Thus, we propose that activated Hsf1 inhibits rapamycin resistance and TOR signaling via elevated expression of specific target genes in S. cerevisiae. Additionally, these results highlight the value of comparative expression analyses between large-scale proteomic and transcriptomic datasets to reveal new regulatory connections
Evaluating Preparative Isoelectric Focusing of Complex Peptide Mixtures for Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics: A Case Study in Profiling Chromatin-Enriched Subcellular Fractions in Saccharomyces
Preparative Peptide Isoelectric Focusing as a Tool for Improving the Identification of Lysine-Acetylated Peptides from Complex Mixtures
Large-Scale Phosphoproteomics Analysis of Whole Saliva Reveals a Distinct Phosphorylation Pattern
Hexapeptide Libraries for Enhanced Protein PTM Identification and Relative Abundance Profiling in Whole Human Saliva
Performance of preclinical models in predicting drug‑induced liver injury in humans: a systematic review
Drug‑induced liver injury (DILI) causes one in three market withdrawals due to adverse drug reactions, causing preventable human suffering and massive financial loss. We applied evidence‑based methods to investigate the role of preclinical studies in predicting human DILI using two anti‑diabetic drugs from the same class, but with different toxicological profiles: troglitazone (withdrawn from US market due to DILI) and rosiglitazone (remains on US market). Evidence Stream 1: A systematic literature review of in vivo studies on rosiglitazone or troglitazone was conducted (PROSPERO registration CRD42018112353). Evidence Stream 2: in vitro data on troglitazone and rosiglitazone were retrieved from the US EPA ToxCast database. Evidence Stream 3: troglitazone‑ and rosiglitazone‑related DILI cases were retrieved from WHO Vigibase. All three evidence stream analyses were conducted according to evidence‑based methodologies and performed according to pre‑registered protocols. Evidence Stream 1: 9288 references were identified, with 42 studies included in analysis. No reported biomarker for either drug indicated a strong hazard signal in either preclinical animal or human studies. All included studies had substantial limitations, resulting in “low” or “very low” certainty in findings. Evidence Stream 2: Troglitazone was active in twice as many in vitro assays (129) as rosiglitazone (60), indicating a strong signal for more off‑target effects. Evidence Stream 3: We observed a fivefold difference in both all adverse events and liver‑related adverse events reported, and an eightfold difference in fatalities for troglitazone, compared to rosiglitazone. In summary, published animal and human trials failed to predict troglitazone’s potential to cause severe liver injury in a wider patient population, while in vitro data showed marked differences in the two drugs’ off‑target activities, offering a new paradigm for reducing drug attrition in late development and in the market. This investigation concludes that death and disability due to adverse drug reactions may be prevented if mechanistic information is deployed at early stages of drug development by pharmaceutical companies and is considered by regulators as a part of regulatory submissions
Flexible and Accessible Workflows for Improved Proteogenomic Analysis Using the Galaxy Framework
Proteogenomics combines large-scale
genomic and transcriptomic
data with mass-spectrometry-based proteomic data to discover novel
protein sequence variants and improve genome annotation. In contrast
with conventional proteomic applications, proteogenomic analysis requires
a number of additional data processing steps. Ideally, these required
steps would be integrated and automated via a single software platform
offering accessibility for wet-bench researchers as well as flexibility
for user-specific customization and integration of new software tools
as they emerge. Toward this end, we have extended the Galaxy bioinformatics
framework to facilitate proteogenomic analysis. Using analysis of
whole human saliva as an example, we demonstrate Galaxy’s flexibility
through the creation of a modular workflow incorporating both established
and customized software tools that improve depth and quality of proteogenomic
results. Our customized Galaxy-based software includes automated,
batch-mode BLASTP searching and a Peptide Sequence Match Evaluator
tool, both useful for evaluating the veracity of putative novel peptide
identifications. Our complex workflow (approximately 140 steps) can
be easily shared using built-in Galaxy functions, enabling their use
and customization by others. Our results provide a blueprint for the
establishment of the Galaxy framework as an ideal solution for the
emerging field of proteogenomics
Flexible and Accessible Workflows for Improved Proteogenomic Analysis Using the Galaxy Framework
Proteogenomics combines large-scale
genomic and transcriptomic
data with mass-spectrometry-based proteomic data to discover novel
protein sequence variants and improve genome annotation. In contrast
with conventional proteomic applications, proteogenomic analysis requires
a number of additional data processing steps. Ideally, these required
steps would be integrated and automated via a single software platform
offering accessibility for wet-bench researchers as well as flexibility
for user-specific customization and integration of new software tools
as they emerge. Toward this end, we have extended the Galaxy bioinformatics
framework to facilitate proteogenomic analysis. Using analysis of
whole human saliva as an example, we demonstrate Galaxy’s flexibility
through the creation of a modular workflow incorporating both established
and customized software tools that improve depth and quality of proteogenomic
results. Our customized Galaxy-based software includes automated,
batch-mode BLASTP searching and a Peptide Sequence Match Evaluator
tool, both useful for evaluating the veracity of putative novel peptide
identifications. Our complex workflow (approximately 140 steps) can
be easily shared using built-in Galaxy functions, enabling their use
and customization by others. Our results provide a blueprint for the
establishment of the Galaxy framework as an ideal solution for the
emerging field of proteogenomics