Age-Related Vascularization and Ossification of Joints in Children: An International Pilot Study to Test Multiobserver Ultrasound Reliability

International audienceObjective: To determine the intra- and interobserver reliability of ultrasound (US)-detected age-related joint vascularization and ossification grading in healthy children. Methods: Following standardized image acquisition and machine setting protocols, 10 international US experts examined 4 joints (wrist, second metacarpophalangeal joint, knee, and ankle) in 12 healthy children (divided into 4 age groups: 2–4, 5–8, 9–12, and 13–16 years). Gray-scale was used to detect the ossification grade, and power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) was used to detect physiologic vascularization. Ossification was graded from 0 (no ossification) to 3 (complete ossification). A positive PDUS signal was defined as any PDUS signal inside the joint. Kappa statistics were applied for intra- and interobserver reliability. Results: According to the specific joint and age, up to 4 solitary PDUS signals (mean 1.5) were detected within each joint area with predominant localization of the physiologic vascularization in specific anatomic positions: fat pad, epiphysis, physis, and short bone cartilage. The kappa values for ossification grading were 0.87 (range 0.85–0.91) and 0.58 for intra- and interobserver reliability, respectively. The bias-adjusted kappa values for intra- and interobserver reliability were 0.71 (range 0.44–1.00) and 0.69, respectively. Conclusion: Detection of normal findings (i.e., grading of physiologic ossification during skeletal maturation and identification of physiologic vessels) can be highly reliable by using clear definitions and a standardized acquisition protocol. These data will permit development of a reliable and standardized US approach for evaluating pediatric joint pathologies

Consensus-based semi-quantitative ultrasound scoring system for gout lesions: Results of an OMERACT Delphi process and web-reliability exercise

International audienceObjective: This study aimed to develop (1) a new ultrasound definition for aggregates and (2) a semi-quantitative ultrasound scoring system (0–3) for tophus, double contour and aggregates. Furthermore, the intra- and inter-reader reliabilities of both the re-defined aggregates and the semi-quantitative scoring system were assessed using static image exercises. Methods: Thirty-seven rheumatologists were invited. A Delphi process was used for re-defining aggregates and for selecting a semi-quantitative scoring system with >75% agreement obligate for reaching consensus. Subsequently, a web-based exercise on static ultrasound images was conducted in order to assess the reliability of both the re-defined aggregates and the semi-quantitative scoring system. Results: Twenty rheumatologists contributed to all rounds of the Delphi and image exercises. A consensual re-definition of aggregates was obtained after three Delphi rounds but needed an overarching principle for scoring aggregates in patients. A consensus-based semi-quantitative ultrasound scoring system for gout lesions was developed after two Delphi rounds. The re-definition of aggregates showed good intra- and inter-reader reliability (κ-values 0.71 and 0.61). The reliabilities of the scoring system were good for all lesions with slightly higher intra-reader (κ-values 0.74–0.80) than inter-reader reliabilities (κ-values 0.61–0.67). Conclusion: A re-definition of aggregates was obtained with a good reliability when assessing static images. The first consensus-based semi-quantitative ultrasound scoring system for gout-specific lesions was developed with good inter- and intra-reader reliability for all lesions when tested in static images. The next step is to assess the reliabilities when scoring lesions in patients