7 research outputs found

    Complicaciones neurológicas en el trasplante alogénico de progenitores hematopoyéticos

    Get PDF
    Las complicaciones neurológicas son una complicación de considerable morbilidad y mortalidad en el trasplante alogénico de progenitores hematopoyéticos (alo-TPH), con una incidencia muy variable en la literatura (entre 8% y el 65%) debido a la variabilidad en los criterios diagnósticos y la dificultad de diagnóstico. En este proyecto de tesis se analiza la incidencia de las diversas complicaciones neurológicas en el alo-TPH, se describen las características clínicas de los distintos tipos de complicaciones neurológicas en el alo-TPH, se evalúa su impacto pronóstico y se analizan los factores de riesgo para su desarrollo. En resumen, se estudió una cohorte de 971 pacientes tratados en el Hospital La Fe entre el años 2000 y 2016. La incidencia acumulada de desarrollo de al menos una complicación neurológica fue 6,3% a los 30 días, 9% a los 3 meses, 14,6% al año y 17% a los 5 años, con una incidencia distintas en función del tipo de trasplante (24% a los 5 años tras el TSCU, 20% si donante HLA idéntico no emparentado, 12,3% si hermano HLA idéntico y 7% tras el TPH haploidéntico)

    Post-transplant cyclophosphamide and sirolimus based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia

    Get PDF
    Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has emerged as a promising graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). However, no studies have reported the efficacy of a GvHD prophylaxis based on PTCy with sirolimus (Sir-PTCy) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this retrospective study, we analyze the use of sirolimus in combination with PTCy, with or without mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), on 242 consecutive adult patients with AML undergoing a myeloablative first allo-HSCT from different donor types, in three European centers between January 2017 and December 2020. Seventy-seven (32%) patients received allo-HSCT from HLA-matched sibling donor, 101 (42%) from HLA-matched and mismatched unrelated donor, and 64 (26%) from haploidentical donor. Except for neutrophil and platelet engraftment, which was slower in the haploidentical cohort, no significant differences were observed in major transplant outcomes according to donor type in univariate and multivariate analysis. GvHD prophylaxis with Sir-PTCy, with or without MMF, is safe and effective in patients with AML undergoing myeloablative allo-HSCT, resulting in low rates of transplant-related mortality, relapse/progression, and acute and chronic GvHD in all donor settings

    Sirolimus versus cyclosporine in haploidentical stem cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis

    No full text
    Abstract Sirolimus has emerged as an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors‐based (CNI) graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. This retrospective study compares the outcome of 133 consecutive adult patients with haematological malignancies undergoing haploidentical stem cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), combined with cyclosporine A (PTCy–CsA–MMF, n = 67) or sirolimus (PTCy–Sir–MMF, n = 66) as GVHD prophylaxis strategy. The median follow‐up was 48 (range 22–83) and 13 (range 3–33) months, respectively. PTCy–CsA–MMF was associated in multivariate analyses with a higher risk of acute kidney injury (HR 2.1, 95% CI, 1.21–3.57, p = .008) and thrombotic microangiopathy (HR 12.5, 95% CI, 1.66–93.5, p = .014), whereas PTCy–Sir–MMF was associated with a higher risk of hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) (HR 10.8, 95% CI, 1.52–77, p = .018), especially late‐onset forms, which totally resolved and none of the patients needed discontinuation of sirolimus. Two SOS‐related deaths were detected, both in the PTCy–CsA–MMF subgroup. Both GVHD prophylaxis strategies were otherwise comparable in terms of engraftment, GVHD incidence and survival
    corecore