Reinvestment – the Cause of the Yips?

<div><p>The yips is a multi-etiological phenomenon consisting of involuntary movements during the execution of a skill (e.g., a golf putt). Reinvestment, the conscious control of a movement that detrimentally affects automated movements, is thought to be a potential mechanism leading to the yips. Preventing yips-affected golfers from consciously controlling their movement, therefore, should be beneficial. The aim of the study was to be the first to empirically test in a laboratory whether reinvestment causes the yips and to explore if the tendency to reinvest can explain yips behavior. Nineteen yips-affected golfers participated in a lab experiment. They putted with the dominant arm in a skill-focus and an extraneous condition, in which they had to perform different dual tasks designed either to direct their focus on their own skill or to distract them from it. The tendency to reinvest was estimated via the Movement-Specific Reinvestment Scale. Yips behavior was assessed by putting performance and movement variability. Although the dual-task performance showed that the attentional manipulation worked, the tendency to reinvest did not predict the behavior of the yips-affected golfers in either putting condition. The yips-affected golfers also showed no difference in yips behavior between the skill-focus and the extraneous condition. In other words, the attentional manipulation did not change yips behavior. The data do not support the assumption that there is a link between the yips and reinvestment, likely because of the multi-etiological nature of the yips. Other psychological or neurological mechanisms such as conditioned reactions may better explain the yips and should be investigated.</p></div

Answer sheet for the secondary task in the skill-focus condition.

<p>After the execution of the putt, the participants had to indicate as accurately as possible where the lower arm was located on the swing curves during the execution, when the tone was presented. The gray curve indicates the backswing. The black curve indicates the forward swing.</p

Movement variability and performance of the sample in the pretest.

<p>The excluded participants (5, 18, 21) by video rating also exhibited a low movement variability. The standard deviation for the mean (M) is indicated as error bars.</p

Movement variability in the skill-focus (<i>SE</i> = 17.8) and extraneous (<i>SE</i> = 18.4) conditions.

<p>Error bars indicate the standard deviations of the mean.</p

Performance in the skill-focus (<i>SE</i> = 7.3) and extraneous (<i>SE</i> = 6.8) conditions.

<p>Error bars indicate the standard deviations of the mean.</p

Reliability of measures used in the pretest and putting conditions.

<p>Reliability of measures used in the pretest and putting conditions.</p

Winning Ugly – Gewinnen um jeden Preis?

Lobinger BH, Reinhard ML, Tüschen F, Bentler D, Zepp C, Hellermann F. Winning Ugly – Gewinnen um jeden Preis? Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie. 2023.Im Leistungssport scheint es nicht selten um ein „Gewinnen um jeden Preis“ zu gehen: Wo liegen die Grenzen zwischen regelkonformem, cleverem, taktischem Verhalten im Umgang mit dem Gegner oder der Gegnerin und unfairem, unmoralischem Handeln? Wie sollten sich Sportpsychologinnen und Sportpsychologen dazu positionieren? Ausgehend von Praxisbeispielen widmet sich dieser Beitrag dem Forschungsstand zu Winning Ugly und Trash Talk in der Praxis des Leistungssports. Als Rahmenkonzept für eine vertiefte Diskussion und die Ableitung erster Konsequenzen und Interventionsmöglichkeiten vor allem im Fußball, wird ein ökosystemischer Zugang gewählt. Dieser diskutiert Erscheinungsformen, potentielle psychologische Ursachen und Zusammenhänge für Spieler_in, Trainer_in, Mannschaft, Eltern und Verein. Die so charakterisierte Praxis des „Gewinnen um jeden Preis“ wird vor dem Hintergrund der Verwendung von injunktiven und deskriptiven Normen und Werten im System Leistungssport diskutiert. Mit Bezug zum professionellen Handeln in der Angewandten Sportpsychologie werden abschließend Thesen im Umgang mit beispielhaften Winning Ugly Verhaltensweisen zur Diskussion gestellt