53 research outputs found

    Extensive recombination events and horizontal gene transfer shaped the Legionella pneumophila genomes

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p><it>Legionella pneumophila </it>is an intracellular pathogen of environmental protozoa. When humans inhale contaminated aerosols this bacterium may cause a severe pneumonia called Legionnaires' disease. Despite the abundance of dozens of <it>Legionella </it>species in aquatic reservoirs, the vast majority of human disease is caused by a single serogroup (Sg) of a single species, namely <it>L. pneumophila </it>Sg1. To get further insights into genome dynamics and evolution of Sg1 strains, we sequenced strains Lorraine and HL 0604 1035 (Sg1) and compared them to the available sequences of Sg1 strains Paris, Lens, Corby and Philadelphia, resulting in a comprehensive multigenome analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We show that <it>L. pneumophila </it>Sg1 has a highly conserved and syntenic core genome that comprises the many eukaryotic like proteins and a conserved repertoire of over 200 Dot/Icm type IV secreted substrates. However, recombination events and horizontal gene transfer are frequent. In particular the analyses of the distribution of nucleotide polymorphisms suggests that large chromosomal fragments of over 200 kbs are exchanged between <it>L. pneumophila </it>strains and contribute to the genome dynamics in the natural population. The many secretion systems present might be implicated in exchange of these fragments by conjugal transfer. Plasmids also play a role in genome diversification and are exchanged among strains and circulate between different <it>Legionella </it>species.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Horizontal gene transfer among bacteria and from eukaryotes to <it>L. pneumophila </it>as well as recombination between strains allows different clones to evolve into predominant disease clones and others to replace them subsequently within relatively short periods of time.</p

    Relative effectiveness and adverse effects of cervical manipulation, mobilisation and the activator instrument in patients with sub-acute non-specific neck pain: results from a stopped randomised trial

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Neck pain of a mechanical nature is a common complaint seen by practitioners of manual medicine, who use a multitude of methods to treat the condition. It is not known, however, if any of these methods are superior in treatment effectiveness. This trial was stopped due to poor recruitment. The purposes of this report are (1) to describe the trial protocol, (2) to report on the data obtained from subjects who completed the study, (3) to discuss the problems we encountered in conducting this study.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A pragmatic randomised clinical trial was undertaken. Patients who met eligibility criteria were randomised into three groups. One group was treated using specific segmental high velocity low amplitude manipulation (diversified), another by specific segmental mobilisation, and a third group by the Activator instrument. All three groups were also treated for any myofascial distortions and given appropriate exercises and advice. Participants were treated six times over a three-week period or until they reported being pain free. The primary outcome measure for the study was Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC); secondary outcome measures included the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36v<sub>2</sub>), the neck Bournemouth Questionnaire, and the numerical rating scale for pain intensity. Participants also kept a diary of any pain medication taken and noted any perceived adverse effects of treatment. Outcomes were measured at four points: end of treatment, and 3, 6, and 12 months thereafter.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Between January 2007 and March 2008, 123 patients were assessed for eligibility, of these 47 were considered eligible, of which 16 were allocated to manipulation, 16 to the Activator instrument and 15 to the mobilisation group. Comparison between the groups on the PGIC adjusted for baseline covariants did not show a significant difference for any of the endpoints. Within group analyses for change from baseline to the 12-month follow up for secondary outcomes were significant for all groups on the Bournemouth Questionnaire and for pain, while the mobilisation group had a significant improvement on the PCS and MCS subscales of the SF-36<sub>v2</sub>. Finally, there were no moderate, severe, or long-lasting adverse effects reported by any participant in any group.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Although the small sample size must be taken into consideration, it appears that all three methods of treating mechanical neck pain had a long-term benefit for subacute neck pain, without moderate or serious adverse events associated with any of the treatment methods. There were difficulties in recruiting subjects to this trial. This pragmatic trial should be repeated with a larger sample size.</p

    Measurement of Cross-Linked Fibrin Derivatives in Patients Undergoing Abdominal-Surgery - Use in the Diagnosis of Postoperative Venous Thrombosis

    No full text
    Levels of plasma crosslinked fibrin derivatives, a sensitive and direct marker of the lysis of intravascular crosslinked fibrin, were measured serially in 135 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery to determine their behavior and their use as a screening test for postoperative venous thrombosis. Preoperative levels and levels on the first postoperative day were significantly higher by both enzyme immunoassay and latex assay in 31 patients who developed venous thrombosis (positive venography) than in 104 patients who did not (negative I-125 fibrinogen leg scan). Preoperative XLFDP levels 400 ng/ml (enzyme immunoassay) had a sensitivity to the diagnosis of postoperative venous thrombosis of 58%, specificity 74%, positive predictive value 41% and negative predictive value of 85%. The sensitivity of XLFDP levels over 1200 ng/ml on the first postoperative day was 65%, specificity 73%, positive predictive value 38% and negative predictive value 89%. These cutoff values were chosen (high negative predictive value) to allow identification of patients who were unlikely to have venous thrombosis. Measurement of plasma XLFDP, a simple inexpensive test, could bc used as a screen to select patients for surveillance procedures (IPG or duplex ultrasonography). A substantial increase in XLFDP levels (> 500 ng/ml) occurred in virtually all patients, suggesting that fibrinolysis is not 'shutdown' postoperatively and that these assays reflect lytic activity at the fibrin surface more accurately than do measurements of plasminogen activators and their inhibitors
    corecore