Development of sustainable drinking water quality solutions for rural communities in the developing world

In developed countries potable water is usually taken for granted, where advanced infrastructure and a strong economy has allowed waterborne diseases (such as cholera and dysentery) to be virtually eradicated. In contrast, developing countries have poor infrastructure, lack development, stability and vibrancy. Consuming untreated, and potentially contaminated, groundwater extracted from shallow wells is the only option. The primary aim of this study was to undertake an extensive field water quality-sampling programme in rural villages throughout Malawi. About 95 % of all the wells tested failed to meet safe drinking water values for untreated water in the wet season, while about 80 % of the wells failed in the dry season. The main forms of contamination emanate from bacteriological and physical constituents. As noted in the United Nations post-2015 water agenda, water quality is just as important as water quantity—the two are inextricably linked. Hence, there is currently a great need to develop more appropriate, cost-effective options to treat water; particularly to reduce the 3.5 million deaths related to inadequate water supply and sanitation each year. Subsequently the aim was directed towards investigating a sustainable, yet appropriate, way to treat shallow well water to significantly improve quality. The most suitable method to remove coliforms and turbidity from water is via the process of coagulation, using aluminium sulphate (alum) or ferric sulphate (ferric). The limited availability and relative expense of these chemicals has led to other more appropriate indigenous coagulants being sought for developing countries. Natural plant extracts have been available for water purification for many centuries. However, the science and engineering application of the use of plant extracts have not really been developed. To start to address this, Leeds Beckett University and the University of Malawi—The Polytechnic have shown that a locally available plant extract, Moringa oleifera, which grows wild throughout rural villages in developing countries, can be used to improve water quality in the order of 80–94 %. The flocculent capacity of M. oleifera is closely comparable to that of a well-established chemical coagulant, alum

Comparative study between M. oleifera and aluminum sulfate for water treatment: case study Colombia

The world has a water deficit, mostly located in developing countries. For example, in Colombia, water deficit is a major concern and it increases in rural areas, where the rate of accessibility to drinking water is of 33.26 % in 2005. Since the 1970s, the most used technology for water purification is the conventional physicochemical process. The most common coagulant used in this process is aluminum sulfate (alum). This study focuses on a comparison between Moringa oleifera seeds and alum for water treatment in different natural waters. Results showed that M. oleifera removed 90 % turbidity and alum 96 % from water samples from the tested natural brook. However, color removal for M. oleifera was 95 and 80.3 % for alum. For water-polluted samples, both coagulants have shown high efficiency (100 %) in color and turbidity removal. Usage of natural coagulants (i.e., M. oleifera) instead of chemical ones (i.e., alum) are more convenient in rural areas where the economic situation and accessibility of those products are key elements to maintain fresh water treatment standards. Additionally, results demonstrated that high dosages M. oleifera did not affect the optimal value in terms of color and turbidity removal. In rural and developing countries, this is important because it does not require a sophisticated dosing equipment