Effectiveness of oncogenetics training on general practitioners' consultation skills: a randomized controlled trial

Contains fulltext : 137892.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)PURPOSE: General practitioners are increasingly called upon to deliver genetic services and could play a key role in translating potentially life-saving advancements in oncogenetic technologies to patient care. If general practitioners are to make an effective contribution in this area, their genetics competencies need to be upgraded. The aim of this study was to investigate whether oncogenetics training for general practitioners improves their genetic consultation skills. METHODS: In this pragmatic, blinded, randomized controlled trial, the intervention consisted of a 4-h training (December 2011 and April 2012), covering oncogenetic consultation skills (family history, familial risk assessment, and efficient referral), attitude (medical ethical issues), and clinical knowledge required in primary-care consultations. Outcomes were measured using observation checklists by unannounced standardized patients and self-reported questionnaires. RESULTS: Of 88 randomized general practitioners who initially agreed to participate, 56 completed all measurements. Key consultation skills significantly and substantially improved; regression coefficients after intervention were equivalent to 0.34 and 0.28 at 3-month follow-up, indicating a moderate effect size. Satisfaction and perceived applicability of newly learned skills were highly scored. CONCLUSION: The general practitioner-specific training proved to be a feasible, satisfactory, and clinically applicable method to improve oncogenetics consultation skills and could be used as an educational framework to inform future training activities with the ultimate aim of improving medical care

Competency Assessment

Assessment is an essential feature of the competency-based educational model because only by means of evaluation can we verify achievement of specified learning outcomes. This is especially important in the context of health professions education, where the competencies of interest impact the well-being of patients. Therefore, just as with planning the instructional component of a curriculum, development of an assessment system must start with the specification of desired learning outcomes in the form of knowledge, skills, and attitudes expected of trainees or practitioners in order to provide safe and effective patient care. Issues to consider when judging the quality of evaluation methods include the reliability of data generated by the assessment, validity of decisions based on test results, educational impact on individuals undergoing evaluation and other stakeholders, and the feasibility of implementing the assessment system. In addition to these criteria and the particular competencies to be evaluated, the choice of testing methods from among numerous available techniques should consider multiple dimensions, such as appropriate level of assessment, stage of learner development, and, very importantly, overall purpose and context of the assessment. Ultimately, no one method can assess all aspects of professional competence, but familiarity with strengths and limitations of various modalities can guide the development of appropriate assessment systems. Strengths of simulation-based methods for evaluative purposes include the ability to assess actual performance of psychomotor skills and demonstration of nontechnical professional competencies in environments that safely and authentically mirror real practice settings. In addition, the programmability of simulations permits on-demand testing of rare but important clinical situations and consistent presentation of evaluation problems to multiple examinees; this reproducibility becomes especially important when high-stakes decisions are contingent upon such assessments