Effect of a single oral doseof milrinone on left ventricular diastolic performance in the failing humanheart

In 14 patients with severe congestive heart failure, left ventricular pressure (measured by tip manometer) and derived variables were measured before and every 10 minutes after administration of oral milrinone (10 mg) for 50 minutes along with measurements of coronary sinus blood flow and drug plasma levels. Arterial and coronary sinus catecholamines were measured only before and 50 minutes after milrinone. Left ventricular pressure, volume (as determined by angiography) and derived indexes were simultaneously assessed at matched atrial paced heart rate before and 60 minutes after milrinone. Three patients who did not achieve a therapeutic plasma level (less than 150 ng/ml) were excluded. Peak negative first derivative of left ventricular pressure (-dP/dt) progressively and significantly increased (10%) together with a decrease in the two exponential time constants of relaxation, namely, Tau 1 (19%) and Tau 2 (22%), which represent the fit for and after the first 40 ms, respectively. Coronary flow significantly increased by 43% within 30 minutes, whereas the decrease (-13%) in coronary vascular resistance failed to be statistically significant. No change occurred in catecholamine concentrations after milrinone. Peak filling rate significantly increased by 15%. Pressure-volume curves showed a leftward and, in four patients, a downward shift; a significant decrease in minimal left ventricular diastolic and end-diastolic pressures (by 55 and 38%, respectively) and in end-diastolic volume (18%) occurred. The constant of elastic chamber stiffness measured by the simple elastic model tended to decrease, but failed to achieve a statistically significant level. Thus, oral milrinone improved left ventricular early relaxation and filling as well as chamber distensibility. This global improvement of diastolic function makes milrinone a potentially useful drug in the oral treatment of heart failure

Does Systematic Adherence to Joint Commission and AHA Heart Failure Performance Measures Improve Patient Outcomes?

Introduction It is unclear whether inpatient heart failure (HF) performance measures reduce post-discharge adverse events. This exploratory study examined the association between systematic adherence to a set of performance measures and outcomes. Measures included all four Joint Commission (JC) HF core measures and AHA recommended beta blockade prescription on discharge. Methods A retrospective review of a 3-hospital system was performed for all patients discharged with a primary diagnosis of HF in 2008-2009. Patients were included if they met eligibility criteria for one or more measures (n=1270). ‘Perfect care’ was defined as compliance with all eligible measures. Subsequent all-cause 30-day readmission and 1-year mortality was determined via electronic records and social security national database. Results ‘Perfect care’ significantly reduced 30-day readmissions (19.2% vs. 24.9%, p=.045; OR=.72, 95% CI 0.52-0.99). ‘Perfect care’ did not influence 1-year mortality. Conclusions Adherence to this set of composite performance measures positively influenced short-term patient outcomes. Benefit of adherence was found despite the longer LOS and higher severity of illness on index admission for patients receiving ‘perfect care’. The data support the clinical value of a systematic approach towards HF care on patient care quality. ‘Perfect care’ did not influence long term outcomes, which may be because inpatient processes do not extend to long term outpatient medical management

Cardiac transplant outcome of patients supported on left ventricular assist device vs. intravenous inotropic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Although the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has been increasingly used as a bridge to transplant, its effect on post-transplant outcome is uncertain. We, therefore, designed this study using the Cardiac Transplant Research Database to compare patients supported on an LVAD before transplant with those treated with intravenous inotropic medical therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 5,880 patients transplanted between 1990 and 1997, a total of 502 received support from LVADs and 2,514 received intravenous inotropic medical therapy at the time of transplant. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in post-transplant survival between the LVAD and medical-therapy groups (p = 0.09). Results of a multivariate Cox regression analysis were consistent with that of the Kaplan-Meier analysis and did not identify LVAD as a significant risk factor for mortality. The percentage of patients who received LVADs as a function of total transplants increased from 2% in 1990 to 16% in 1997. Furthermore, although the number of extracorporeal LVADs remained relatively constant, the number of intracorporeal LVADs increased over time. Multivariate parametric analysis found that the risk factors for post-transplant death in the LVAD group were extracorporeal LVAD use (p = 0.0004), elevated serum creatinine (p = 0.05), older donor age (p = 0.03), increased donor ischemic time (p < 0.0001), and earlier year of transplant (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Given a limited donor supply, the intracorporeal LVAD helps the sickest patients survive to transplant and provides post-transplant outcome similar to that of patients supported on inotropic medical therapy. Therefore, patients supported on LVADs before transplant may receive the greatest marginal benefit when compared with other transplant candidates