39 research outputs found

    Genetic and acquired factors influencing the effectiveness and toxicity of drug therapy in osteoporosis

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength, usually related to decreased bone mass and microstructural alterations of bone tissue, predisposing a person to an increased risk of fracture. As other prevalent disorders, osteoporosis is the result of a complex interplay of genetic and acquired factors. Areas covered: We provide an update of recent studies aimed at identifying the clinical and genetic factors that influence the response to drugs used to treat osteoporosis, as well as those determining the risk of two intriguing adverse effects of antiresorptives: osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and atypical femoral fractures (AFF). Expert opinion: Several clinical factors have been suggested to increase the risk of a poor drug response, such as advanced age and frailty. Candidate gene studies suggest that some common polymorphisms of the Wnt pathway and farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FDPS), the target enzyme for bisphosphonates, also influence the response to antiresorptives. However, they await for replication in large independent cohorts of patients. Similarly, some genetic and acquired factors may influence the risk of ONJ and AFF. Preliminary data suggest that the risk of suffering these adverse effects may have a polygenic basis

    Does diagnostic delay result in decreased survival in paediatric brain tumours?

    Full text link
    To study the hypothesis that a delay in the diagnosis of paediatric brain tumours results in decreased survival outcome probability, we compared the prediagnostic period of 315 brain tumour patients (median age 6.7 years, range, 0 to 16 years) with progression-free and overall survival. The median prediagnostic symptomatic interval was 60 days (range, 0 to 3,480 days), with a median parental delay of 14 days (range, 0 to 1,835 days) and a median doctor's delay of 14 days (range, 0 to 3,480 days). The prediagnostic symptomatic interval correlated significantly with the patient age, tumour histology, tumour location and year of diagnosis, but not with gender. We then grouped the patients according to histology (low-grade glioma [n=77], medulloblastoma [n=57], high-grade glioma [n=40], craniopharyngioma [n=27], ependymoma [n=20] and germ cell tumours [n=18]). Contrary to common belief, long prediagnostic symptomatic interval or long doctor's delay did not result in decreased survival outcome probability in any of these groups. The effect of tumour biology on survival seems to be dominant and overwhelms any possible opposing effect on survival of a delay in diagnosis
    corecore