43 research outputs found

    Quantifying the production of plant pollen at the farm scale

    Get PDF
    Summary: Plant pollen is rich in protein, sterols and lipids, providing crucial nutrition for many pollinators. However, we know very little about the quantity, quality and timing of pollen availability in real landscapes, limiting our ability to improve food supply for pollinators. We quantify the floral longevity and pollen production of a whole plant community for the first time, enabling us to calculate daily pollen availability. We combine these data with floral abundance and nectar measures from UK farmland to quantify pollen and nectar production at the landscape scale throughout the year. Pollen and nectar production were significantly correlated at the floral unit, and landscape level. The species providing the highest quantity of pollen on farmland were Salix spp. (38%), Filipendula ulmaria (14%), Rubus fruticosus (10%) and Taraxacum officinale (9%). Hedgerows were the most pollen‐rich habitats, but permanent pasture provided the majority of pollen at the landscape scale, because of its large area. Pollen and nectar were closely associated in their phenology, with both peaking in late April, before declining steeply in June and remaining low throughout the year. Our data provide a starting point for including pollen in floral resource assessments and ensuring the nutritional requirements of pollinators are met in farmland landscapes

    Landscape-scale drivers of pollinator communities may depend on land-use configuration

    Get PDF
    Research into pollinators in managed landscapes has recently combined approaches of pollination ecology and landscape ecology, because key stressors are likely to interact across wide areas. While laboratory and field experiments are valuable for furthering understanding, studies are required to investigate the interacting drivers of pollinator health and diversity across a broader range of landscapes and a wider array of taxa. Here, we use a network of 96 study landscapes in six topographically diverse regions of Britain, to test the combined importance of honeybee density, insecticide loadings, floral resource availability and habitat diversity to pollinator communities. We also explore the interactions between these drivers and the cover and proximity of semi-natural habitat. We found that among our four drivers, only honeybee density was positively related to wild pollinator abundance and diversity, and the positive association between abundance and floral resources depended on insecticide loadings and habitat diversity. By contrast, our exploratory models including habitat composition metrics revealed a complex suite of interactive effects. These results demonstrate that improving pollinator community composition and health is unlikely to be achieved with general resource enhancements only. Rather, local land-use context should be considered in fine-tuning pollinator management and conservation

    Information et compétition dans les systÚmes plantes-Îllinisateurs (rÎles de la structure spatiale et dela diversité des communautés végétales)

    No full text
    Les systĂšmes plantes-pollinisateurs sont constituĂ©s de deux communautĂ©s, une animale et une vĂ©gĂ©tale dont les individus entretiennent des interactions mutualistes qui sont essentielles Ă  la pollinisation. Mes travaux de recherche ont eu pour principal objet l Ă©tude des interactions entre insectes pollinisateurs d une part et entre plantes d autre part, ainsi que leurs impacts respectifs sur les paramĂštres clĂ©s de l interaction plante-pollinisateur, Ă  savoir les comportements de butinage et l attractivitĂ© des plantes. Dans un premier axe, mon attention s est portĂ©e sur l utilisation de l information sociale par inadvertance (ISI), dĂ©finie comme l information produite de façon fortuite par les autres, dans les choix d espĂšces florales Ă  visiter chez les bourdons (Bombus terrestris L.). Une premiĂšre expĂ©rience rĂ©alisĂ©e avec des fleurs artificielles montre que l attraction sociale permet aux bourdons d exploiter plus efficacement leur environnement alors constituĂ© d espĂšces florales difficilement discriminables et spatialement hĂ©tĂ©rogĂšnes. Dans une seconde expĂ©rience, la flexibilitĂ© de l utilisation de l ISI a Ă©tĂ© Ă©tudiĂ©e en fonction de la densitĂ© de congĂ©nĂšres et de la diversitĂ© des communautĂ©s florales. J ai montrĂ© que les congĂ©nĂšres pouvaient ĂȘtre perçus comme source d information et de compĂ©tition en fonction du contexte environnemental. Ces Ă©tudes soulignent l importance des communautĂ©s vĂ©gĂ©tales dans l utilisation de l ISI par les bourdons, et en retour, les implications de ce comportement pour la pollinisation vĂ©gĂ©tale sont discutĂ©es. Le second axe de cette thĂšse est consacrĂ© Ă  l Ă©tude de l impact des interactions de compĂ©tition et de facilitation entre plantes pour l accĂšs aux ressources, sur les paramĂštres liĂ©s Ă  l attractivitĂ© des plantes pour les pollinisateurs. En manipulant expĂ©rimentalement la diversitĂ© de communautĂ©s vĂ©gĂ©tales, j ai montrĂ© que la prĂ©sence d espĂšces hautement compĂ©titives pouvait altĂ©rer l investissement des plantes voisines moins compĂ©titives dans leur production de nectar, via une diminution concomitante du nombre de fleurs et du volume de nectar par fleur. Par ailleurs, l apport de litiĂšres produites par ces communautĂ©s vĂ©gĂ©tales aux sols pourrait augmenter l attractivitĂ© des communautĂ©s vĂ©gĂ©tales aux pollinisateurs. Ceci suggĂšre que les interactions entre plantes pour l accĂšs aux services de pollinisation peuvent ĂȘtre indirectement modifiĂ©es par les interactions qu elles entretiennent pour l accĂšs Ă  d autres ressources.PARIS-BIUSJ-Physique recherche (751052113) / SudocSudocFranceF

    Effect of local spatial plant distribution and conspecific density on bumble bee foraging behaviour

    No full text
    International audience1. Size variations in pollinator populations may modify competitive interactions among foragers. Competition among pollinators has been shown to lead to one of two contrasting behaviours: either specialisation to the most profitable plant species or generalisation to several species. When foraging, pollinators are also confronted with heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of plant resources. Because variations in both the forager density and plant spatial distribution can affect pollinator behaviour, focus was on the interactive effect of these two factors. 2. Bumble bee (Bombus terrestris L.) individuals were trained on a focal species (Lotus corniculatus L.) and experimentally tested whether variations in the forager density (two or six bumble bees foraging together), plant community spatial distribution (two plant species: L. corniculatus and Medicago sativa, which were either patchily or randomly distributed), and their interaction modified bumble bee foraging behaviour. 3. It was shown that when confronted with a high forager density, bumble bees focused their visits towards the most familiar species, especially when foraging under a random plant distribution. These modifications affected the fruiting of the focal plant species, with a significantly lower reproductive success under low density/patchy conditions. 4. This study demonstrates that the foraging decisions of bumble bees are influenced by variations in both the conspecific density and plant spatial distribution. Given the increasing impact of human activities on plant-pollinator communities, this raises the question of the potential implications of these results for plant communities in natural conditions when confronted with variations in the pollinator density and spatial distribution of plants

    Phylogenetic, functional and taxonomic responses of wild bee communities along urbanisation gradients

    No full text
    International audienceIncreasing urbanisation is one of the primary drivers of land-use change that threaten biodiversity. Wild bee communities have been reported with contrasting responses to urbanisation, with varying effects on abundance and taxonomical diversity. The suite of functional traits exhibited by wild bee species might determine their persistence in urban areas. Urbanisation thus can impose an environmental filter with potential consequences on the functional and phylogenetical diversity of wild bee communities.Here, we sampled 2944 wild bee specimens from 156 species in 29 sites located along an urbanisation gradient using a replicated design in three mid-sized cities in the Loire valley (France). We show that urban landscape cover has a negative effect on overall species richness and taxonomical diversity indices, while total abundance remains constant. Species loss was taxon dependent, mainly driven by Andrenidae and Halictidae. Only a few species, especially of the genus Lasioglossum, were positively affected by the urban landscape cover.Urban and peri-urban areas differed in their composition of bee assemblages. Species turnover was the main component of beta diversity, driving community dissimilarities through the urban gradient. Urbanisation favours bees with small body sizes, social structure and extended flight periods but did not affect the phylogenetic or the functional diversity of communities.Our findings have implications for understanding the factors involved in the environmental filter exerted through the urban gradient on bee communities helping to implement conservation measures and managing urban spaces for bees

    Flower density values of common British plant species [AgriLand]

    No full text
    This dataset consists of flower density values of common British plant species. The data were collected during field surveys taking place from February to October in 2011 and 2012. The majority of field sites were located in the south of England. The data were collected under a project named 'Agriland' ( Linking agriculture and land use change to pollinator populations) based at the University of Bristol, as part of the UK Insect Pollinators Initiative. The Insect Pollinators Initiative (IPI) was funded by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the Scottish Government and the Wellcome Trust, under the auspices of the Living With Environmental Change (LWEC) partnership

    Bumblebee colony density on farmland is influenced by late-summer nectar supply and garden cover

    Get PDF
    Floral resources are important in limiting pollinator populations, but they are often highly variable across time and space and the effect of this variation on pollinator population dynamics is not well understood. The phenology (timing) of floral resources is thought to be important in structuring pollinator populations, but few studies have directly investigated this. Our study quantifies the landscape composition, seasonal nectar and pollen supply, and Bombus terrestris colony density of 12 farms in southwest UK to investigate how landscape composition influences the phenology of floral resources and how both these factors affect colony density. We use this information in a spatially explicit predictive model to estimate the effect of different farmland management scenarios on seasonal resource supplies and colony density. We find that farmland nectar supply during September is a strong predictor of B. terrestris colony density in the following year, explaining over half of all the variation in colony density; no other period of resource availability showed a significant association. Semi‐natural habitat cover was not a good proxy for nectar or pollen supply and showed no significant association with colony density. However, the proportional cover of gardens in the landscape was significantly associated with colony density. The predictive model results suggest that increasing the area of semi‐natural flowering habitat has limited effect on bumblebee populations. However, improving the quality of these habitats through Environmental Stewardship and other management options is predicted to reduce the late‐summer resource bottleneck and increase colony density. Synthesis and Applications: Our study demonstrates the importance of considering the phenology of resources, rather than just total resource availability, when designing measures to support pollinators. Late‐summer appears to be a resource bottleneck for bumblebees in UK farmland, and consequently management strategies which increase late‐summer nectar availability may be the most effective. These include mowing regimes to delay flowering of field margins until September, planting late‐flowering cover crops such as red clover, and supporting late‐flowering wild plant species such as Hedera helix. Our results also suggest that rural gardens may play an important role in supporting farmland bumblebee populations

    Facial area and hairiness of pollinators visiting semi-natural grassland wild plants predict their facial pollen load

    No full text
    International audience1. Consequences of a decline in pollination function in semi-natural ecosystems are largely unknown due to variability in pollinator effectiveness, that is, their contribution to pollen deposition alone. While pollination effectiveness has been shown to be related to body size and hairiness of pollinators for some crops, studies encompassing a wide diversity of pollinators interacting with wild plant communities are lacking. 2. Thus, the relationships between pollen load, which is a measurement of pollen transport ability and a proxy of pollinator effectiveness, and morphological traits of pollinators sampled in 16 grasslands in Moselle, France, were investigated. The area, hairiness, and pollen load of each pollinator's face were measured for 658 individuals from 127 bee and fly species interacting with 36 wild plant species. Pollinator dry mass was also measured on 543 individuals from 109 species. 3. Dry body mass and facial area of pollinators were positively linked. This study highlights that bees transported significantly more pollen grains on their face than flies. Furthermore, bees' faces were larger and hairier. We also found that pollinators' facial pollen load increased with facial area and hairiness when we considered all pollinators. However, hairiness is not significant within pollinator group (bees or flies), mirroring a potential phylogenetic signal. 4. Hence, this study shows a wide diversity of pollinator and plant species in which larger and hairier pollinators may transport more pollen grains, at least on their face. However, future studies involving other pollinator body parts are needed to generalise these relationships
    corecore