Added value of co-morbidity in predicting health-related quality of life in COPD patients

AbstractThe extent to which a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patient is impaired in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is only to a small extent reflected in clinical and demographical measures. As the influence of co-morbidity on HRQoL is less clear, we investigated the added value of 23 common diseases in predicting HRQoL in COPD patients with mild to severe airways obstruction.COPD patients from general practice who appeared to have an forced expiratory volume in 1 sec/inspiratory vital capacity (FEV1/IVC) < predicted −1·64 SD, FEV1<80% predicted, FEV1reversibility <12% and a smoking history, were included (n=163). HRQoL was assessed with the short-form-36 (SF-36) and the presence of co-morbidity was determined by a questionnaire, which asked for 23 common diseases.All domains of the SF-36 were best predicted by the presence of three or more co-morbid diseases. FEV1% predicted, dyspnoea and the presence of one or two diseases were second-best predictors. Co-morbidity explained an additional part of the variance in HRQoL, particularly for emotional functioning (ΔR2=0·11). When individual diseases were investigated, only insomnia appeared to be related to HRQoL.As HRQoL is still only partly explained, co-morbidity and other patient characteristics do not clearly distinguish between COPD patients with severe impairments in HRQoL and COPD patients with minor or no impairments in HRQoL. Therefore, it remains important to ask for problems in daily functioning and well-being, rather than to rely on patient characteristics alone

Etniciteit en verwijzing voor astma naar de kinderarts in Amsterdam West

Contains fulltext : 25798___.PDF (publisher's version ) (Open Access

Geïntegreerde seksespecifieke huisartsgeneeskunde in de Nijmeegse huisartsenopleiding: competenties, opzet en evaluatie.

Item does not contain fulltex

Variation in spirometry utilization between trained general practitioners in practices equipped with a spirometer.

Contains fulltext : 51151.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)OBJECTIVE: To explore spirometry utilization among general practitioners and identify practitioner and practice-related factors associated with spirometry utilization. DESIGN: Multivariate multilevel cross-sectional analysis of a questionnaire survey. SETTING: Some 61 general practices involved in a spirometry evaluation programme in the Netherlands. All practices owned a spirometer and were trained to perform spirometry. SUBJECTS: A total of 144 general practitioners and 179 practice assistants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Extent of spirometry utilization for five indications from national COPD/asthma guidelines, practitioner and practice-related factors associated with spirometry utilization. RESULTS: The response rate was 97%. General practitioners used spirometry mostly to evaluate treatment with inhaled steroids (58%). Significant practitioner-related factors associated with spirometry utilization were: general practitioners' job satisfaction, general practitioners' general interest in research, and prior participation in spirometry training. Practice-related factors associated with spirometry utilization were: presence of a practice nurse, delegation of medical tasks to practice assistants, use of spirometry in different rooms, and use of protocols in practice. CONCLUSION: Practitioner- as well as practice-related factors were associated with the extent of spirometry utilization. In particular, it is essential to improve practice-related factors (e.g. presence of a practice nurse, more delegation of medical tasks to the practice assistant)

How to conceptualize professionalism.

Contains fulltext : 58275.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access

General practitioners' needs for ongoing support for the interpretation of spirometry tests.

Contains fulltext : 53446.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Although one out of three general practitioners (GPs) carries out spirometry, the diagnostic interpretation of spirometric test results appears to be a common barrier for GPs towards its routine application. METHODS: Multivariate cross-sectional analysis of a questionnaire survey among 137 GPs who participated in a spirometry evaluation programme in the Netherlands. We identified characteristics of GPs and their practice settings associated with GPs' need for ongoing support for spirometry interpretation. RESULTS: Response rate on the survey questionnaire was 98%. The need for ongoing support among the participating GPs was 69%. GPs' recent spirometry training showed a statistically significant association with the need for ongoing support for the interpretation of spirometry (odds ratio 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.92). CONCLUSION: There is a need for ongoing support for spirometry interpretation among GPs. Recent spirometry training partially diminished this need

Bridging the gap between primary care and public health.

Contains fulltext : 80797.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)In August 2007, a registrar of our general practitioner training program in The Netherlands diagnosed pneumonia in a young, otherwise healthy, male patient. The registrar established that the patient was in a stable condition and had no risk factors for respiratory tract disease. After consulting the GP supervisor, the patient was treated in the community. This consultation illustrates the place of primary care in the 'ecology of medical care' - most patients contact primary health care professionals for most health problems, most of the time. Through primary care, the use of medical care facilities is navigated, and patients' needs are taken into account. The personalised decision was to treat him at home, the navigation decision that no referral or hospital admittance was needed

A Delphi technique as a method for selecting the content of an electronic patient record for asthma.

Item does not contain fulltextINTRODUCTION: An electronic patient record (EPR) with disease-specific data may support improvement of the quality of care for patients with chronic diseases. The structure and content of such a record can only be assessed by clinicians in co-operation with IT-specialists, because, the result has to be clinically relevant, easily accessible and adjusted to the information needs of different workers in primary care. METHODS: We applied a modified Delphi-procedure--a method characterized by anonymous written comments by an expert panel. The panel had to agree about the question whether or not an item should be included in the EPR. The questions for the written comments were prepared by a steering committee (general practitioners (GP) and health scientists, either expert in asthma and disease management or IT-specialist) based on the guidelines for diagnosing and treating asthma of the Dutch College of General Practitioners (DCGP). When agreement within the panel was < or = 70%, we sent a modified format to the expert panel for reassessment. RESULTS: Three written commentary rounds were necessary, in which 95 potential items were discussed with the expert panel. In the first round they selected 50 items relating to diagnosing asthma and 22 concerning the treatment of asthma. During the second round 17 items were still under discussion and six were rejected. In subsequent rounds, the expert-panel assessed the best registration format (operationalisation). The written rounds failed to create a full consensus. Therefore the study ended with a consensus meeting of the expert panel. Due to the presence and contribution of nearly all experts, consensus could be reached about the structure and contents of the EPR on asthma. DISCUSSION: The modified Delphi procedure, proved to be a feasible method for selecting the optimal content of an electronic registration protocol. Both, written and verbal commentary rounds were necessary. The existence of a set of guidelines was essential

Kan de 'asthma control questionnaire' (ACQ) gebruikt worden om astmapatiënten met en zonder goede symptoomcontrole van elkaar te onderscheiden? Resultaten van een pilotstudie.

Contains fulltext : 69565.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access

Smoking cessation in patients with COPD in daily general practice (SMOCC): six months' results.

Contains fulltext : 47877.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)BACKGROUND: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) forms an increasing health problem. Despite smoking cessation improving the prognosis of the disease, many patients persist smoking. The present study presents the results of a smoking cessation counseling protocol in general practice (Smoking Cessation in patients with COPD in general practice (SMOCC)). METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of patients with COPD compared smoking cessation counseling according to an intensified minimal intervention strategy with usual care. In total 43 general practices with 392 patients participated in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, in 2001-2002. RESULTS: Significantly more smokers in the experimental group made a quit attempt (44.9% versus 36.5%) and actually quit smoking than in the control group (16.0% versus 8.8%). The motivation to stop smoking at baseline was not associated with smoking cessation. CONCLUSION: The SMOCC strategy doubled the self-reported quit rates and was complied well by the general practitioners. Implementation in general practice is recommended