35 research outputs found

    The three-dimensional reconstruction of the dilated renal pelvicalyceal system by non-enhanced computed tomography

    Get PDF
    Introduction. The three-dimensional reconstruction of the renal pelvicalyceal system (PCS) is possible when performing enhanced computed tomography (CT). However, the use of a contrast agent has its limitations associated with the presence of allergy and chronic kidney disease.Purpose of the study. To describe the method of semi-autonomous three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the PCS based on non-enhanced CT images of patients with upper urinary tract obstruction.Materials and methods. Five patients diagnosed with renal colic were recruited from April-May 2021. All patients underwent CT-urography after informed consent. Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit program (MITK) expanded with explainable update were used for 3D-reconstruction of PCS via excretory and native phases. To assess the accuracy of the latter, both contrast and non-contrast models were compared regarding their surface area. Also, the PCS of one patient was used to reconstruct virtual endoscopic views based on enhanced and non-enhanced models. Five urologists estimated their similarity and potential use of non-enhanced models for the interventional planning via a Likert scale questionnaire. The resulting models were also analyzed by programmer-engineers to test their suitability for 3D-printing.Results. The average surface area of enhanced and non-enhanced models was 3291 mm2 and 2879 mm2, respectively. Obtained models were suitable for their intraluminal reconstruction and potential 3D-printing. Analyzed properties of non-enhanced models were estimated at 4.5 out of 5.0.Conclusion. The described semi-autonomous reconstruction of the renal PCS based on non-enhanced CT images allows for a short time to reconstruct its 3D-view in patients with the upper urinary tract obstruction

    ВНУВРЕННЕЕ Π”Π Π•ΠΠ˜Π ΠžΠ’ΠΠΠ˜Π• Π’Π•Π Π₯НИΠ₯ ΠœΠžΠ§Π•Π’Π«Π’ΠžΠ”Π―Π©Π˜Π₯ ΠŸΠ£Π’Π•Π™ ПРИ ОПУΠ₯ΠžΠ›Π•Π’Π«Π₯ ΠžΠ‘Π‘Π’Π Π£ΠšΠ¦Π˜Π―Π₯ ΠœΠžΠ§Π•Π’ΠžΠ§ΠΠ˜ΠšΠžΠ’

    Get PDF
    The paper analyzes procedures for internal drainage of the upper urinary tract in ureteral tumor obstructions. It details indications for and contraindications to ureteral stenting or endoprostethic replacement, subcutaneous nephrovesical bypass. Postoperative complications and procedures for their prevention and treatment are considered. The data available in the literature on rare drainage procedures for the upper urinary tract, such as ureteral endoprosthetic replacement and nephrovesical bypass, are summarized.ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π²Π½ΡƒΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π½Π½ΠΈΡ… ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² дрСнирования Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ…Π½ΠΈΡ… ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Ρ‹Ρ… обструкциях ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ². ΠŸΠΎΠ΄Ρ€ΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎ освСщСны показания ΠΈ противопоказания ΠΊ ΡΡ‚Π΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡŽ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡŽ ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ°, Π½Π΅Ρ„Ρ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π·ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡƒ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡƒ ΡˆΡƒΠ½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡŽ. РассмотрСны послСопСрационныС ослоТнСния, способы ΠΈΡ… ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ лСчСния. ΠžΠ±ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰Π΅Π½Ρ‹ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Ρ‹ ΠΏΠΎ Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΠΊΠΈΠΌ способам дрСнирования Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ…Π½ΠΈΡ… ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ эндопротСзированиС ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈ Π½Π΅Ρ„Ρ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π·ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡˆΡƒΠ½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅

    Comparative analysis of the results of standard and minipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy for staghorn stones

    Get PDF
    Introduction. There are conflicting data in the literature on the results of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) in staghorn stones.Objective. To compare the results of standard and mini-PCNL.Materials and methods. The results of PCNL in 90 patients with staghorn stones were analyzed, which were divided into two groups. In the I group, 58 (64.4%) patients underwent standard PNL with a nephroscope 24 Fr, in the II group, 32 (35.6%) patients underwent mini-PCNL with an endoscope 15 Fr. The operative time and the number of postoperative complications were compared. To assess the effectiveness of PCNL, an overview radiography or native computed tomography was performed. The operation was considered successful with residual fragments less than 3 mm.Results. Operative time, number of complications and blood transfusions, the effectiveness of PCNL in groups I and II were 80.0 Β± 20.6 and 96.5 Β± 25.0 min, 24.1% and 15.6%, 10.3% and 3.1%, 86.2% and 84.4%. Additional interventions were resorted to in 7 (12.1%) patients in I group, and in 4 (12.5%) patients in II group. Complications in I and II groups were observed in 14 (24.1%) and 5 (15.6%) cases. The frequency of blood transfusions was significantly higher after standard PCNL (10.3% / 3.1%, p < 0.05). Complications of grade III with mini-PCNL, replacement of an incorrectly installed stent was included in 2 patients, and with standard PCNL, ureteral stenting with urine leakage through the nephrostomic tract in 2 patients, drainage of the pleural cavity in one case.Conclusion. Standard PCNL is an effective method in staghorn stones, but the number of complications after it remains higher. In selected patients with staghorn stones, the results of mini-PCNL are comparable to those of standard PCNL

    Π ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ‚-ассистированная Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ цистэктомия с ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΡ€ΠΏΠΎΡ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ортотопичСский цистопластикой

    Get PDF
    Background. Radical cystectomy uses laparoscopic and robotic approaches along with the open ones.Objective: to study immediate results of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic cystoplasty.Materials and methods. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic cystoplasty was performed in 15 patients (13 male, 2 female), aged 64–76 years. Fourteen patients had bladder cancer, 1 female – a postradiation bladder fistula and microcystis. T2 stage was detected in 8 (57.1 %) patients, T3 – in 6 (42.9 %). After the operation we evaluated operation time, blood loss volume, hospital stay, functional and oncological results.Results. Average operation time was 380 (320–560) minutes, blood loss volume – 80–200 ml, blood transfusion was not performed. Early complications (up to 30 days) were observed in 7 patients (46.7 %), late ones (90‑days) – in 6 (40.0 %). There were no cases of intestinal obstruction. Patients with ureteral-intestinal (n = 2) and reservoir-urethral (n = 1) anastomosis failure underwent percutaneous renal drainage. One patient died of acute myocardial infarction. Daytime continence was 80.0 %, nocturnal – 53.3 %. One patient died of disease progression within 7.6 observation months.Conclusion. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urine diversion is a modern and minimally invasive method for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. More experience in this field will allow to reduce surgery time and number of complications.Π’Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ цистэктомии наряду с ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΡ€Ρ‹Ρ‚Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ лапароскопичСский ΠΈ роботичСский доступы.ЦСль исслСдования – ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±Π»ΠΈΠΆΠ°ΠΉΡˆΠΈΡ… Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² Ρ€ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ‚-ассистированной Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ цистэктомии с ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΡ€ΠΏΠΎΡ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ортотопичСской цистопластикой.ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Π ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ‚-ассистированная Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ цистэктомия с ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΡ€ΠΏΠΎΡ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ортотопичСской цистопластикой Π²Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π° 15 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ (13 ΠΌΡƒΠΆΡ‡ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌ, 2 ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌ). Возраст ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² составил 64–76 Π»Π΅Ρ‚. Π£ 14 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΊ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Π±Ρ‹Π» Ρ€Π°ΠΊ ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ пузыря, Ρƒ 1 ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹ – постлучСвой ΠΏΡƒΠ·Ρ‹Ρ€Π½ΠΎ-сигмовидный свищ, микроцистис. Бтадия T2 выявлСна Ρƒ 8 (57,1 %), Π’3 – Ρƒ 6 (42,9 %) ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ². ПослС ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ врСмя ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, объСм ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈ, сроки госпитализации, Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΈ онкологичСскиС Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹.Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. Π‘Ρ€Π΅Π΄Π½Π΅Π΅ врСмя ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ составило 380 (320–560) ΠΌΠΈΠ½. ОбъСм ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈ – 80–200 ΠΌΠ», гСмотрансфузия Π½Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡŒ. Π Π°Π½Π½ΠΈΠ΅ (Π΄ΠΎ 30 Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΉ) ослоТнСния наблюдались Ρƒ 7 (46,7 %), ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π΄Π½ΠΈΠ΅ (90‑днСвныС) – Ρƒ 6 (40,0 %) Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ…. Π‘Π»ΡƒΡ‡Π°Π΅Π² ΠΊΠΈΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ нСпроходимости Π½Π΅ ΠΎΡ‚ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΎ. Π‘ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ с Π½Π΅ΡΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎ-ΠΊΠΈΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ (n = 2) ΠΈ Ρ€Π΅Π·Π΅Ρ€Π²ΡƒΠ°Ρ€Π½ΠΎ-ΡƒΡ€Π΅Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ анастомоза (n = 1) ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΡŒ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΊΡƒΡ‚Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π΄Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡Π΅ΠΊ. Один ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ ΡƒΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ ΠΎΡ‚ острого ΠΈΠ½Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΊΡ‚Π° ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄Π°. ДнСвная континСнция составила 80,0 %, ночная – 53,3 %. Π—Π° 7,6 мСс наблюдСния 1 больной ΡƒΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ ΠΎΡ‚ прогрСссирования заболСвания.Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ‚-ассистированная Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ цистэктомия с ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΡ€ΠΏΠΎΡ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΡ‡ΠΈ являСтся соврСмСнным ΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΎΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ лСчСния Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎ-ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ пузыря. Π”Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡˆΠ΅Π΅ Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡ‹Ρ‚Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ ΡΠΎΠΊΡ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ врСмя ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ число ослоТнСний

    ΠžΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΡ…Ρ€Π°Π½ΡΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ опухолях Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ…Π½ΠΈΡ… мочСвыводящих ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π΅ΠΉ

    Get PDF
    The results of organ-preserving interventions are analyzed in 12 patients (7 males and 5 females) with neoplasms of the renal pelvis and ureter. Endoscopic operations were performed in 4 patients with the normally functioning contralateral kidney and in one patient with the single kidney. Early complications developed in 2 of the 12 patients and were infectious and inflammatory. The mean duration of endoscopic surgery was 32.8Β±4.9 min; intraoperative blood loss is 83.0Β±15.3 ml; the duration of open surgery averaged 157.2Β±29.7 min and intraoperative blood loss was 1930Β±69.3 ml. After 4 years of a follow-up, the frequency of tumor relapse was 40%; 5-year survival was 80%. Thus, in patients with upper urinary tract neoplasms, organ-preserving operations are a justifiable alternative to nephroureterectomy with urinary bladder resection and most reasonable in uni- and bilateral renal tumor. Urinary tract endoscopic examination assessing the possibilities of freely manipulating an endoscope in the ureteral lumen and renal cavitary system for biopsy of a tumor and its further removal is a major and determining factor in defining indications for this type of intervention.The results of organ-preserving interventions are analyzed in 12 patients (7 males and 5 females) with neoplasms of the renal pelvis and ureter. Endoscopic operations were performed in 4 patients with the normally functioning contralateral kidney and in one patient with the single kidney. Early complications developed in 2 of the 12 patients and were infectious and inflammatory. The mean duration of endoscopic surgery was 32.8Β±4.9 min; intraoperative blood loss is 83.0Β±15.3 ml; the duration of open surgery averaged 157.2Β±29.7 min and intraoperative blood loss was 1930Β±69.3 ml. After 4 years of a follow-up, the frequency of tumor relapse was 40%; 5-year survival was 80%. Thus, in patients with upper urinary tract neoplasms, organ-preserving operations are a justifiable alternative to nephroureterectomy with urinary bladder resection and most reasonable in uni- and bilateral renal tumor. Urinary tract endoscopic examination assessing the possibilities of freely manipulating an endoscope in the ureteral lumen and renal cavitary system for biopsy of a tumor and its further removal is a major and determining factor in defining indications for this type of intervention

    ΠžΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΈΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½Π°Ρ ΠΏΠ» астика ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ пузыря

    Get PDF
    The purpose of the investigation was to study the long-term results of reconstructive surgery in patients who had undergone simultaneousΒ ureteral and bladder intestinoplasty. The investigation enrolled 33 patients with different bladder diseases complicated by secondary hydroureteronephrosis.Β After radical cystectomy, the U. E. Studer method was used to form a low-pressure orthotopic reservoir from the ileum withΒ an afferent tubular segment in 23 (69.7 %) patients. Y-shaped ileoureterocystoplasty was carried out to recover extensive ureteral and bladderΒ defects in 10 (30.3 %) cases. Long-term surgical results were assessed on the basis of a comprehensive examination involving laboratory,Β X-ray, radionuclide, and endourological studies. An isolated loop of the small bowel is a universal plastic material that may be used not onlyΒ to bilaterally replace any ureteral defect, but also to simultaneously repair the bladder, by preserving independent urination.ЦСль исслСдования – ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡ‚Π΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² рСконструктивных ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ Ρƒ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ…, ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΡˆΠΈΡ… ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡƒΡŽ пластику ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ пузыря. Π’ Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Ρƒ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½Ρ‹ 33 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ страдали Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ заболСваниями ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ пузыря, ослоТнСнными Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Π³ΠΈΠ΄Ρ€ΠΎΡƒΡ€Π΅Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Π΅Ρ„Ρ€ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠΌ. Π£ 23 (69,7 %) Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… послС Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ цистэктомии Π±Ρ‹Π» сформирован ортотопичСский Ρ€Π΅Π·Π΅Ρ€Π²ΡƒΠ°Ρ€ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ давлСния ΠΈΠ· подвздошной кишки с Π°Ρ„Ρ„Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ тубулярным сСгмСнтом ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΡƒΒ U. E. Studer. Π’ 10 (30,3 %) случаях для восстановлСния протяТСнных Π΄Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ пузыря использовали Y-ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Π½ΡƒΡŽ илСоурСтСроцистопластику. ΠžΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΡƒ ΠΎΡ‚Π΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π½Π° основании комплСксного обслСдования, Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π°ΡŽΡ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π»Π°Π±ΠΎΡ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½Ρ‹Π΅, рСнтгСнологичСскиС, Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΏΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΈ эндоурологичСскиС ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ обслСдования. Π˜Π·ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Π°Ρ пСтля Ρ‚ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠΉ кишки являСтся ΡƒΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΡΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ пластичСским ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠΌ, ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ‰ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒΒ Π½Π΅ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΎ любой Π΄Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² с ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΠΈΡ… сторон, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΡƒΡ‰Π΅ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡŽ ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ пузыря с сохранСниСм ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ мочСиспускания

    Π§Π Π•Π‘ΠšΠžΠ–ΠΠΠ― Π­ΠΠ”ΠžΠ‘ΠšΠžΠŸΠ˜Π§Π•Π‘ΠšΠΠ― Π­Π›Π•ΠšΠ’Π ΠžΠ Π•Π—Π•ΠšΠ¦Π˜Π― ОПУΠ₯ΠžΠ›Π•Π™ Π›ΠžΠ₯АНКИ

    Get PDF
    The paper gives the results of percutaneous electroresection of the renal pelvic wall with a tumor in 4 patients. The operation has been made for absolute indications: 3 patients had a single kidney and the fourth patient had a single functioning left kidney (the right pelvic dystopic kidney failed to function). In all the patients, the primary symptom of the disease was macrohematuria, the examination for which revealed a renal pelvic tumor measuring 1.2 to 2.5 cm in size. There were no complications after percutaneous electroresection of the renal pelvic wall with a tumor. Intrarenal BCG therapy was performed in the postoperative period. Percutaneous electroresection is indicated for tumors of the renal pelvis and the upper third of the ureter of the single kidney.Π’ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠ΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ‹ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ чрСскоТной элСктрорСзСкции стСнки Π»ΠΎΡ…Π°Π½ΠΊΠΈ с ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡŽ, Π²Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρƒ 4 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ². ΠžΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ Π±Ρ‹Π»Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎ Π°Π±ΡΠΎΠ»ΡŽΡ‚Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ показаниям: Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π»ΠΈ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΡΡ‚Π²Π΅Π½Π½ΡƒΡŽ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΡƒ, Π° Ρ‡Π΅Ρ‚Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ‚Ρ‹ΠΉ – СдинствСнно Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΡƒΡŽ Π»Π΅Π²ΡƒΡŽ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΡƒ (правая тазоводистопированная ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠ° Π½Π΅ Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»Π°). ΠŸΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ симптомом заболСвания Ρƒ всСх ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² являлось Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ обслСдовании ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρƒ ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠΉ Π±Ρ‹Π»Π° выявлСна ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΡŒ Π»ΠΎΡ…Π°Π½ΠΊΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡ‚ 1,2 Π΄ΠΎ 2,5 см. ОслоТнСний послС осущСствлСния ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΊΡƒΡ‚Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ элСктрорСзСкции стСнки Π»ΠΎΡ…Π°Π½ΠΊΠΈ с ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡŽ Π½Π΅ наблюдали. Π’ послСопСрационном ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π° ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ€Π΅Π½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ Π‘Π¦Π–-тСрапия. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ опухолях Π»ΠΎΡ…Π°Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ…Π½Π΅ΠΉ Ρ‚Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ° СдинствСнной ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π° ΠΈΡ… пСркутанная элСктрорСзСкция
    corecore