157 research outputs found

    "Belgica" Mounds in Porcupine Seabight, NE Atlantic: Biological Zonation and Environmental Control

    Get PDF
    The Belgica mounds are located on the eastern slope of Porcupine Basin between 51°10'N - 51°35'N and 11°30'W-11°45'W in water depths of 600 m to 900 m. Outcropping mounds are located on the steepest part of the slope between 750 m and 850 m. They are largest in the south and decrease in size to the north where the slope is gentler. These larger mounds merge into composite mounds up to 190 m high, 2 km to over 4 km long and have a width between 500 m - 1000 m. The eastern upslope flank of seafloor mounds is ponded with sediment while the entire western, downslope flank of the mounds remains exposed. Despite the evident asymmetry in depositional environment at both sides of a mound, Belgica mounds appear conical on seismic profiles, with an average slope of 10-15°. The base of the Belgica mounds is formed by a continuous erosional surface, probably of Miocene age. The deeply incised substratum features a very faintly stratified seismic facies and is absent in the northern part of the province. It is underlain by a sequence of sigmoidal deposits. This start-up event suggests drastic environmental changes that favoured coral growth at a certain period. Such changes may have been triggered by changes in the oceanographic circulation patterns. The mounds are associated with features related to strong currents. Zonation and biodiversity of the present coral banks was investigated by means of a videotransect and boxcoring across some of the mounds. Mainly the basinward flanks of the mounds showed patchy Lophelia communities in association with a diverse epifauna of mainly sponges and polychaetes. Along these flanks the biological communities showed a symmetrical zonation pattern. Frequently, a small patch of living Lophelia midway the mound slope grades on either side into a dead coral zone that finally turns into a coral rubble zone

    Revealing species assembly rules in nematode communities

    Get PDF
    Species assemblages are not randomly assembled from a local species pool; they often show segregated or aggregated distribution patterns. These patterns may be attributed to both biotic and abiotic factors. On a large scale abiotic factors may be important, while on a smaller scale other factors such as species interactions may become essential. Here we will focus on small-scale patterns in nematode communities. Species patterns are generally revealed by null models based on presence/absence data. Since there is an increasing chance of falsely rejecting the null hypothesis of a random assembled community with increasing matrix size, we used an algorithm generating independent null matrices and applied a large number of swap attempts to build a null matrix. Moreover, we applied an additional test to reveal the susceptibility of the analyses of checker and the C-, T- and Vscore to a Type I error for randomised data. To minimise the influence of the abiotic environment, we restricted the swapping algorithm of the null model to the replicate samples of one sampling event. Since stronger species interactions are expected for species of the same functional type, the nematode data was split according to the four feeding types defined by Wieser (1953). Our data indicate that species tend to aggregate and co-occur more often in some replicate samples than would be expected from a random species distribution of the local species pool. This is in accordance with the patchy distribution patterns known for nematode species. These aggregated patterns are also found for the different feeding types. The factors causing these aggregated patterns cannot be established since they are not included in the data, but the data do indicate that competitive exclusion is unlikely at the scale of a sample core

    Mining deep-ocean mineral deposits: what are the ecological risks?

    Get PDF
    A key question for the future management of the oceans is whether the mineral deposits that exist on the seafloor of the deep ocean can be extracted without significant adverse effects to the environment. The potential impacts of mining are wide-ranging and will vary depending on the type of metal-rich mineral deposit being mined. There is, currently, a significant lack of information about deep-ocean ecosystems and about potential mining technologies: thus, there could be many unforeseen impacts. Here, we discuss the potential ecological impacts of deep-ocean mining and identify the key knowledge gaps to be addressed. Baseline studies must be undertaken, as well as regular monitoring of a mine area, before, during, and after mineral extraction.The attached document is the author’s submitted version of the journal article. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it

    Ecology and Biogeography of Free-Living Nematodes Associated with Chemosynthetic Environments in the Deep Sea: A Review

    Get PDF
    Background: Here, insight is provided into the present knowledge on free-living nematodes associated with chemosynthetic environments in the deep sea. It was investigated if the same trends of high standing stock, low diversity, and the dominance of a specialized fauna, as observed for macro-invertebrates, are also present in the nematodes in both vents and seeps. Methodology: This review is based on existing literature, in combination with integrated analysis of datasets, obtained through the Census of Marine Life program on Biogeography of Deep-Water Chemosynthetic Ecosystems (ChEss). Findings: Nematodes are often thriving in the sulphidic sediments of deep cold seeps, with standing stock values ocassionaly exceeding largely the numbers at background sites. Vents seem not characterized by elevated densities. Both chemosynthetic driven ecosystems are showing low nematode diversity, and high dominance of single species. Genera richness seems inversely correlated to vent and seep fluid emissions, associated with distinct habitat types. Deep-sea cold seeps and hydrothermal vents are, however, highly dissimilar in terms of community composition and dominant taxa. There is no unique affinity of particular nematode taxa with seeps or vents. Conclusions: It seems that shallow water relatives, rather than typical deep-sea taxa, have successfully colonized the reduced sediments of seeps at large water depth. For vents, the taxonomic similarity with adjacent regular sediments is much higher, supporting rather the importance of local adaptation, than that of long distance distribution. Likely the ephemeral nature of vents, its long distance offshore and the absence of pelagic transport mechanisms, have prevented so far the establishment of a successful and typical vent nematode fauna. Some future perspectives in meiofauna research are provided in order to get a more integrated picture of vent and seep biological processes, including all components of the marine ecosystem
    • …
    corecore