Disparities in Perioperative Radiation Therapy Use in Elderly Patients With Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

The benefit of perioperative radiation therapy in elderly patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is unclear due to the underrepresentation of elderly patients in clinical trials. We assessed patterns of care and overall survival (OS) associated with perioperative radiation therapy use in this population. Elderly patients (≥70 years) with high-grade STS who underwent surgery with or without perioperative radiation therapy from 2004 to 2013 were identified from the National Cancer Database. A nonelderly cohort (<70 years) was also identified for secondary comparative analyses. The association between perioperative radiation therapy use and OS was assessed using propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards analyses. Relative survival was calculated using national life tables to assess the impact of radiation therapy on estimated sarcoma-specific survival in elderly and nonelderly patients. Patterns of care were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Of 6978 elderly patients, 3549 (51%) underwent surgery alone, and 740 (11%) and 2,679 (38%) received pre- and postoperative radiation therapy, respectively. Elderly patients received radiation therapy less commonly than did nonelderly patients (49% vs 52%, P < .001) despite presenting with higher grade tumors (grade 3, 86% vs 80%, P < .001) and experiencing more frequent positive surgical margins (23% vs 16%, P < .001). On propensity score-weighted analyses, preoperative (hazard ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval: 0.54-0.77, P < .001) and postoperative (hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.77, P < .001) radiation therapy use was associated with improved OS compared with surgery alone. These associations were robust to landmark analyses of patients surviving at least 12 months. Radiation therapy use resulted in a greater magnitude of 5-year relative survival improvement in elderly than nonelderly patients. There is an overall and an age-disparate underuse of perioperative radiation therapy in elderly patients with high-grade STS despite radiation therapy being associated with improved OS. Further research is warranted to minimize gaps in care for elderly patients

A Nomogram for the Prediction of Cerebrovascular Disease among Patients With Brain Necrosis after Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study sought to develop and validate a nomogram to predict cerebrovascular disease (CVD) among patients with brain necrosis after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 346 eligible patients with brain necrosis after radiotherapy for NPC were divided into a training set (n=231) and a validation set (n=115). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to select the significant variables for CVD prediction in the training set. Then, a nomogram was developed based on the regression model. The performance of the nomogram was assessed with respect to discrimination and calibration. All patients were classified into high- or low-risk groups based on the risk scores derived from the nomogram. Moreover, a decision curve analysis was performed with the combined training and validation sets to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the nomogram. RESULTS: Four significant predictors were identified: hypertension, statin treatment, serum level of high-density lipoprotein, and interval between radiotherapy and brain necrosis. The nomogram incorporating these four predictors showed favorable calibration and discrimination regarding the training set, with a C-index of 0.763 (95% CI, 0.694 to 0.832), which was confirmed using the validation set (C-index 0.768; 95% CI, 0.675 to 0.861). Furthermore, the nomogram successfully stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups. The decision curve indicated that our nomogram was clinically useful. CONCLUSION: The nomogram showed favorable predictive accuracy for CVD among patients with brain necrosis after radiotherapy for NPC and might aid in clinical decision making

Implementation of FDG-PET/CT imaging methodology for quantification of inflammatory response in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results from the ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 trial

We measured changes in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images in the lung parenchyma to quantify the degree of lung inflammation in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received radiotherapy (RT). The goal of this study was to demonstrate successful implementation of this imaging methodology on NSCLC patients and to report quantitative statistics between pre-RT and post-RT. Seventy-one patients with NSCLC underwent FDG-PET/CT imaging before and after RT in a prospective study (ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235). Comparisons between pre-RT and post-RT PET/CT were conducted for partial volume corrected (PVC)-mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), PVC-global lung parenchymal glycolysis (GLPG), and lung volume for both ipsilateral and contralateral lungs using the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Regression modeling was conducted to associate clinical characteristics with post-RT PET/CT parameters. There was a significant increase in average SUVmean and GLPG of the ipsilateral lung (relative change 40% and 20%) between pre-RT and post-RT PET/CT scans (